Object Recognition and Goal-Directed Eye or Hand Movements are Coupled by Visual Attention

A dual-task paradigm required the preparation of a goal-directed movement (hand or eye) concurrently with a letter discrimination task. In the first experiment a hand movement to a location on a virtual circle was required and indicated by a central cue. Simultaneously, the ability to discriminate between the symbols “E” and “3”, presented tachioscopically with various delays on a circular position within surrounding distractors, was taken as a measure of selective perceptual performance. The location of discrimination target remained constant within blocks and was known to the subjects. In the second experiment a saccadic eye movement was required instead of a pointing movement. The data in both experiments clearly demonstrate that discrimination performance is superior when the discrimination target location (DT) is identical to the location of the movement target (MT). When DT and MT refer to different objects, performance deteriorates drastically. We conclude that it is not possible to maintain attention on a stimulus for the purpose of discrimination while preparing a movement to a spatially separate object. This holds, in a quantitatively similar way, for both saccades and manual pointing.

[1]  J. Hoffman,et al.  The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[3]  M. Jeannerod Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects , 1981 .

[4]  W. Schneider VAM: A neuro-cognitive model for visual attention control of segmentation, object recognition, and space-based motor action , 1995 .

[5]  U. Castiello Grasping a fruit: selection for action. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  H. Deubel,et al.  Selective Dorsal and Ventral Processing: Evidence for a Common Attentional Mechanism in Reaching and Perception , 1998 .

[7]  H. Deubel,et al.  Visual attention and saccadic eye movements: Evidence for obligatory and selective spatial coupling , 1995 .

[8]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and performance IX , 1982 .

[10]  H. Deubel,et al.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism , 1996, Vision Research.

[11]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  Attention and Performance 15: Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing , 1994 .

[12]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  J. Findlay,et al.  The Relationship between Eye Movements and Spatial Attention , 1986, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[14]  B. Dosher,et al.  The role of attention in the programming of saccades , 1995, Vision Research.