Shape-Based Algorithm for Automated Design of Low-Thrust, Gravity-Assist Trajectories

Given the benefits of coupling low-thrust propulsion with gravity assists, techniques for easily identifying candidate trajectories would be extremely useful to mission designers. The computational implementation of an analytic, shape-based method for the design of low-thrust, gravity-assist trajectories is described. Two-body motion (central body and spacecraft) is assumed between the flybys, and the gravity-assists are modeled as discontinuities in velocity arising from an instantaneous turning of the spacecraft’s hyperbolic excess velocity vector with respect to the flyby body. The method is augmented by allowing coast arcs to be patched with thrust arcs on the transfers between bodies. The shape-based approach permits not only rapid, broad searches over the design space, but also provides initial estimates for use in trajectory optimization. Numerical examples computed with the shape-based method, using an exponential sinusoid shape, are presented for an Earth‐Mars‐Ceres rendezvous trajectory and an Earth‐Venus‐Earth‐Mars‐Jupiter flyby trajectory. Selected trajectories from the shape-based method are successfully used as initial estimates in an optimization program employing direct methods.

[1]  Marc D. Rayman,et al.  Design of the First Interplanetary Solar Electric Propulsion Mission , 2002 .

[2]  Andrey B. Sergeyevsky,et al.  Interplanetary Mission Design Handbook, Volume I, Part , 2005 .

[3]  Nguyen X. Vinh,et al.  Automated Design of Aerogravity-Assist Trajectories , 2000 .

[4]  R. Battin.  An introduction to the mathematics and methods of astrodynamics , 1987 .

[5]  J. Betts.  Survey of Numerical Methods for Trajectory Optimization , 1998 .

[6]  Victoria Coverstone-Carroll,et al.  Benefits of solar electric propulsion for the next generation of planetary exploration missions , 1997 .

[7]  David H. Lehman,et al.  Results from the Deep Space 1 technology validation mission , 2000 .

[8]  James M. Longuski,et al.  Automated design of multiple encounter gravity-assist trajectories , 1990 .

[9]  C. A. Kluever,et al.  OPTIMAL LOW-THRUST ILNTERPLANETARY TRAJECTORIES BY DIRECT METHOD TECHNIQUES , 1997 .

[10]  Anastassios E. Petropoulos,et al.  Automated Design of Low-Thrust Gravity-Assist Trajectories , 2000 .

[11]  Victoria Coverstone-Carroll,et al.  CONSTANT RADIAL THRUST ACCELERATION REDUX , 1998 .

[12]  Anastassios E. Petropoulos,et al.  Trajectories to Jupiter via Gravity Assists from Venus, Earth, and Mars , 1998 .

[13]  Carl G. Sauer.  Solar Electric Performance for Medlite and Delta Class Planetary Missions , 1997 .

[14]  A. Petropoulos,et al.  A shape -based approach to automated, low-thrust, gravity -assist trajectory design , 2001 .

[15]  Jon A. Sims,et al.  Preliminary Design of Low-Thrust Interplanetary Missions , 1997 .

[16]  T. Tsu.  Interplanetary Travel by Solar Sail , 1959 .

[17]  Jean Albert Kechichian,et al.  Low-thrust trajectory optimization based on epoch eccentric longitude formulation , 1999 .

[18]  Hongxin Wu,et al.  INITIAL ADJOINT VARIABLE GUESS TECHNIQUE AND ITS APPLICATION IN OPTIMAL ORBITAL TRANSFER , 1998 .

[19]  Anastassios E. Petropoulos,et al.  Design and Optimization of Low-Thrust Trajectories with Gravity Assists , 2003 .

[20]  Derek F Lawden,et al.  Optimal trajectories for space navigation , 1964 .

[21]  Christopher D. Hall,et al.  Minimum-Time Continuous-Thrust Orbit Transfers , 1997 .

[22]  James M. Longuski,et al.  V8 Leveraging for Interplanetary Missions: Multiple-Revolution Orbit Techniques , 1997 .

[23]  Steven N. Williams,et al.  Optimal low thrust trajectories using differential inclusion concepts , 1994 .

[24]  Mary B. Murrill.  The grandest tour - Voyager , 1993 .