Optimization of LiDAR scanning and processing for automated structural evaluation of discontinuities in rockmasses

Terrestrial light detection and ranging (LiDAR) can be used for the delineation and evaluation of geomechanically controlled hazards. The United States Geological Survey [1] has adopted the use of LiDAR through numerous projects, as discussed in [2]. Other examples of the use of LiDAR surveys for geological data collection include discussion of the process of acquiring digital outcrop models for stratigraphic modelling [3], mapping basalt flow units [4], structural mapping of a large landslide [5], and evaluation of rockfall source and accumulation zones [6,7]. In non-geologicalbased applications, LiDAR has been used for projects ranging from volumetric analysis in open pit mines [8], to recording and cataloguing archaeological digs in ancient ruins [9]. The equipment mobility, accuracy, and rate of data collection, in comparison to conventional surveying and stereophotogrammetric methods, have allowed existing surface analysis projects to proceed at unprecedented levels of detail and have promoted new applications. The use of terrestrial (ground based) LiDAR as a structural analysis and measurement tool has been investigated in detail by Kemeny and Post [10], Feng and Roshoff [11], Pringle et al. [12], Slob et al. [13] and others. Once the data is acquired and the primary 3D model is generated (as x, y, z data points with intensity scalars or mapped colourization via photo coupling), the analytical process can proceed in a similar fashion to modern photogrammetric techniques such as those applied by Haneberg et al. [14]. Both applications can replace traditional field mapping processes including the use of a compass or inclinometer to measure orientation, photos and notebooks to keep records, and manual data entry. Further, the conventional measurement of

[1]  A. Lamb,et al.  Earth observation technology applied to mining-related environmental issues , 2000 .

[2]  Marco Gaiani,et al.  Virtualized Architectural Heritage: New Tools and Techniques , 2000, IEEE Multim..

[3]  Jamie K. Pringle,et al.  Topics: Virtual geological outcrops – fieldwork and analysis made less exhaustive? , 2004 .

[4]  O. Hungr,et al.  Landslide Risk Management , 2005 .

[5]  Davide Elmo,et al.  Application And Limitations of Ground-based Laser Scanning In Rock Slope Characterization , 2007 .

[6]  Q. Feng,et al.  SINOROCK2004 Paper 1A 23In-situ mapping and documentation of rock faces using full-coverage 3D laser scanning techniques , 2004 .

[7]  David H. Douglas,et al.  ALGORITHMS FOR THE REDUCTION OF THE NUMBER OF POINTS REQUIRED TO REPRESENT A DIGITIZED LINE OR ITS CARICATURE , 1973 .

[8]  Mark S. Diederichs,et al.  Characterizing block geometry in jointed rockmasses , 2006 .

[9]  Evert Hoek,et al.  Practical estimates of rock mass strength , 1997 .

[10]  C. Kerans,et al.  Digital Outcrop Models: Applications of Terrestrial Scanning Lidar Technology in Stratigraphic Modeling , 2005 .

[11]  Erik Eberhardt,et al.  The use of LiDAR to overcome rock slope hazard data collection challenges at Afternoon Creek, Washington , 2006 .

[12]  Tim Webster,et al.  Mapping subtle structures with light detection and ranging (LIDAR): flow units and phreatomagmatic rootless cones in the North Mountain Basalt, Nova Scotia , 2006 .

[13]  R. D. Terzaghi Sources of Error in Joint Surveys , 1965 .

[14]  J. Kemeny,et al.  Estimating three-dimensional rock discontinuity orientation from digital images of fracture traces , 2003 .

[15]  R. Hack,et al.  A METHOD FOR AUTOMATED DISCONTINUITY ANALYSIS OF ROCK SLOPES WITH 3D LASER SCANNING. , 2005 .

[16]  Q. Feng,et al.  In-situ mapping and documentation of rock faces using a full-coverage 3D laser scanning technique , 2004 .