Harvesting techniques for non-industrial biomass plantations

Two harvesting systems especially designed for non-industrial short-rotation forestry (SRF) plantations on farmland were evaluated. Both systems were based on versatile forest technology commonly used for conventional logging operations. They differed especially in where chipping was performed: in the field (terrain chipping) or at the field's edge (roadside chipping). Both systems were tested on two of the most common SRF poplar clones in Italy, namely: AF2 and Monviso. Results were encouraging: harvesting cost varied from 16.3 to 23.2 € t−1, and was lower for terrain chipping and for the most productive clone (Monviso). Energy consumption varied between 147 and 212 MJ oven-dry tonne−1, following the same trends as for harvesting cost. Resulting energy output–input ratios varied from 94 to 139. Life cycle impact assessment showed that the global warming potential (100 yr) was in the range of 2.4–3.4 kg CO2 eq. oven-dry tonne−1. Despite its higher cost, roadside chipping was preferred for its better terrain capability and for the superior storage quality of uncomminuted biomass. Both systems were suboptimal in their current configurations. They could offer a better performance with minor improvements.

[1]  Per-Anders Hansson,et al.  Greenhouse gas balance of harvesting stumps and logging residues for energy in Sweden , 2011 .

[2]  N. Magagnotti,et al.  Work quality and veneer value recovery of mechanised and manual log-making in Italian poplar plantations , 2011, European Journal of Forest Research.

[3]  Shane Ward,et al.  Effect of Working Conditions on Forwarder Productivity in Cut-to-length Timber Harvesting on Sensitive Forest Sites in Ireland , 2004 .

[4]  Natascia Magagnotti,et al.  Upsized Harvesting Technology for Coping with the New Trends in Short-Rotation Coppice , 2011 .

[5]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment: Operational Guide to the ISO Standards , 2002 .

[6]  W. A. Kenney,et al.  A review of biomass quality research relevant to the use of poplar and willow for energy conversion , 1990 .

[7]  Raffaele Spinelli,et al.  A harvest and transport cost model for Eucalyptus spp. fast-growing short rotation plantations. , 2009 .

[8]  M. Londo,et al.  Willow short-rotation coppice in multiple land-use systems: evaluation of four combination options in the Dutch context , 2004 .

[9]  Anders Roos,et al.  Retreat from Salix - Swedish experience with energy crops in the 1990s , 2006 .

[10]  T. Volk,et al.  Energy feedstock characteristics of willow and hybrid poplar clones at harvest age. , 2003 .

[11]  Matthew A. Holtzscher,et al.  Tree diameter effects on cost and productivity of cut-to-length systems , 1997 .

[12]  Natascia Magagnotti,et al.  Performance of a mobile mechanical screen to improve the commercial quality of wood chips for energy. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[13]  H. A. Udo de Haes,et al.  Quantitative life cycle assessment of products: 1:Goal definition and inventory , 1993 .

[14]  G. Keoleian,et al.  Life cycle assessment of a willow bioenergy cropping system , 2003 .

[15]  Raffaele Spinelli,et al.  Analyzing and Estimating Delays in Harvester Operations , 2008 .

[16]  Natascia Magagnotti,et al.  Assessing the cost of stump-site debarking in eucalypt plantations , 2011 .

[17]  Raida Jirjis,et al.  Effects of particle size and pile height on storage and fuel quality of comminuted Salix viminalis , 2005 .

[18]  M. Proe,et al.  Effects of spacing, species and coppicing on leaf area, light interception and photosynthesis in short rotation forestry , 2002 .

[19]  M. Weih,et al.  Above-ground Woody Biomass Production of Short-rotation Populus Plantations on Agricultural Land in Sweden , 2003 .

[20]  Anders Grönlund,et al.  Assessing the role of the harvester within the forestry-wood chain , 2001 .

[21]  Raffaele Spinelli,et al.  Recovering sawlogs from pulpwood-size plantation cottonwood , 2008 .

[22]  R. Heyduck,et al.  Hybrid poplar (Populus ssp.) selections for arid and semi-arid intermountain regions of the western United States , 2010, Agroforestry Systems.

[23]  Natascia Magagnotti,et al.  Using modified foragers to harvest short-rotation poplar plantations , 2009 .

[24]  Natascia Magagnotti,et al.  A tool for productivity and cost forecasting of decentralised wood chipping , 2010 .

[25]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Production physiology and growth potential of poplars under short-rotation forestry culture , 1999 .

[26]  M. Manzone,et al.  Energetic and economic evaluation of a poplar cultivation for the biomass production in Italy. , 2009 .

[27]  Natascia Magagnotti,et al.  Biomass harvesting from buffer strips in Italy: three options compared , 2006, Agroforestry Systems.

[28]  Bo Dahlin,et al.  Cut-To-Length: The Next Decade , 2013 .

[29]  Raffaele Spinelli,et al.  Comparison of short-wood forwarding systems used in Iberia , 2004 .

[30]  T. Verwijst,et al.  Willow coppice systems in short rotation forestry: Effects of plant spacing, rotation length and clonal composition on biomass production , 1993 .

[31]  Anne Roedl.  Production and energetic utilization of wood from short rotation coppice—a life cycle assessment , 2010 .

[32]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Growth and production of a short rotation coppice culture of poplar I. Clonal differences in leaf characteristics in relation to biomass production , 2004 .

[33]  U. Tschirner,et al.  Fiber length and pulping characteristics of switchgrass, alfalfa stems, hybrid poplar and willow biomasses. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[34]  S. Jose,et al.  Biomass production potential of three short rotation woody crop species under varying nitrogen and water availability , 2010, Agroforestry Systems.

[35]  Bruce R. Hartsough,et al.  Harvesting SRF poplar for pulpwood: Experience in the Pacific Northwest , 2006 .

[36]  Theo Verwijst,et al.  Above-ground biomass assessments and first cutting cycle production in willow (Salix sp.) coppice¿a comparison between destructive and non-destructive methods , 2004 .

[37]  Karl Stampfer,et al.  Tree-length system evaluation of second thinning in a loblolly pine plantation , 2003 .

[38]  Lennart Olsson,et al.  Categorising tools for sustainability assessment , 2007 .

[39]  E. Pannacci,et al.  Evaluation of Four Poplar Clones in a Short Rotation Forestry in Central Italy , 2009 .

[40]  Rien Visser,et al.  Analyzing and estimating delays in wood chipping operations. , 2009 .

[41]  S. Pallardy,et al.  Biomass production by two-year-old poplar clones on floodplain sites in the Lower Midwest, USA , 2003, Agroforestry Systems.

[42]  Bruce Talbot,et al.  Analysis of Two Simulated In-field Chipping and Extraction Systems in Spruce Thinnings , 2005 .

[43]  D. W. Einspahr,et al.  Wood and Paper Properties of Vacuum Airlift Segregated Juvenile Poplar Whole-Tree Chips , 2007 .