Impact response of restrained PMHS in frontal sled tests: skeletal deformation patterns under seat belt loading.

This study evaluated the response of restrained post-mortem human subjects (PMHS) in 40 km/h frontal sled tests. Eight male PMHS were restrained on a rigid planar seat by a custom 3-point shoulder and lap belt. A video motion tracking system measured three-dimensional trajectories of multiple skeletal sites on the torso allowing quantification of ribcage deformation. Anterior and superior displacement of the lower ribcage may have contributed to sternal fractures occurring early in the event, at displacement levels below those typically considered injurious, suggesting that fracture risk is not fully described by traditional definitions of chest deformation. The methodology presented here produced novel kinematic data that will be useful in developing biofidelic human models. Additional analysis of the data produced by the reported tests as well as additional tests with a variety of loading conditions are required to fully characterize torso response including ribcage fracture tolerance.

[1]  A. Cappozzo,et al.  Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 2: instrumental errors. , 2004, Gait & posture.

[2]  David Lessley,et al.  Thoracic response to dynamic, non-impact loading from a hub, distributed belt, diagonal belt, and double diagonal belts. , 2004, Stapp car crash journal.

[3]  Bryan Buchholz,et al.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Stephen W Rouhana,et al.  Biomechanics of 4-point seat belt systems in frontal impacts. , 2003, Stapp car crash journal.

[5]  James Patrie,et al.  The Hybrid III dummy as a discriminator of injurious and non-injurious restraint loading. , 2003, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.

[6]  Jeffrey Richard Crandall,et al.  Thoracic response and injury with belt, driver side airbag, and force limited belt restraint systems , 1996 .

[7]  L W Schneider,et al.  Design requirements and specifications: thorax-abdomen development task. Interim report. Trauma assessment device development program , 1989 .

[8]  Andrew Morris,et al.  Requirements for the crash protection of older vehicle passengers. , 2003, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.

[9]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  On the development of a theoretically based, statistically justified, thoracic injury criterion , 2005 .

[10]  P. Prasad,et al.  Derivation and Evaluation of a Provisional, Age-Dependent, AIS3+ Thoracic Risk Curve for Belted Adults in Frontal Impacts , 2005 .

[11]  John W. Melvin,et al.  THORACIC INJURY ASSESSMENT OF BELT RESTRAINT SYSTEMS BASED ON HYBRID III CHEST COMPRESSION. IN: SEAT BELTS: THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN ESSENTIAL SAFETY FEATURE , 1991 .

[12]  N. Howell,et al.  Management of rib and sternal fractures , 2005 .

[13]  Greg Shaw,et al.  The Utility of Hybrid III and THOR Chest Deflection for Discriminating Between Standard and Force-Limiting Belt Systems. , 2003, Stapp car crash journal.

[14]  Heather Rhule,et al.  The Process of Evaluation and Documentation of Crash Test Dummies for Part 572 of the Code of Federal Regulations , 2005 .

[15]  R W Kent,et al.  The influence of superficial soft tissues and restraint condition on thoracic skeletal injury prediction. , 2001, Stapp car crash journal.

[16]  J Forman,et al.  Biomechanical considerations for the optimization of an advanced restraint system: assessing the benefit of a second shoulder belt , 2005 .

[17]  J R Crandall,et al.  BIOFIDELITY EVALUATION OF THE THOR ADVANCED FRONTAL CRASH TEST DUMMY , 2000 .

[18]  Michael J. Salloum,et al.  DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF AN ADVANCED ATD THORAX SYSTEM FOR FRONTAL CRASH ENVIRONMENTS. FINAL REPORT. VOLUME 1. PRIMARY CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT. TRAUMA ASSESSMENT DEVICE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM , 1992 .

[19]  J. Crandall,et al.  Internal vs. External Chest Deformation Response to Shoulder Belt Loading, Part 1: Table-Top Tests , 2009 .

[20]  D. D. Mueller,et al.  Fundamentals of Astrodynamics , 1971 .

[21]  J. Crandall,et al.  Error analysis of curvature-based contour measurement devices , 2000 .

[22]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  Development of an Improved Thoracic Injury Criterion , 1998 .

[23]  Joseph Shin,et al.  Quasi-static and dynamic thoracic loading tests: cadaveric torsos , 2007 .

[24]  T. Shams,et al.  Response of thor in frontal sled testing in different restraint conditions , 1998 .

[25]  C. Tarrière,et al.  Thorax of 3-Point Belt Wearers During a Crash (Experiments with Cadavers) , 1975 .

[26]  Xavier Trosseille,et al.  Laboratory Reconstructions of Real World Frontal Crash Configurations using the Hybrid III and THOR Dummies and PMHS. , 2002, Stapp car crash journal.

[27]  J. Forman,et al.  Thoracic response of belted PMHS, the Hybrid III, and the THOR-NT mid-sized male surrogates in low speed, frontal crashes. , 2006, Stapp car crash journal.

[28]  Brian Fildes,et al.  An overview of requirements for the crash protection of older drivers. , 2002, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.

[29]  Xavier Trosseille,et al.  Rib cage strain pattern as a function of chest loading configuration. , 2008, Stapp car crash journal.

[30]  Stanley H. Backaitis,et al.  Biomechanics of impact injury and injury tolerances of the thorax-shoulder complex , 1994 .

[31]  Christian Krettek,et al.  Sternal fractures occur most often in old cars to seat-belted drivers without any airbag often with concomitant spinal injuries: clinical findings and technical collision variables among 42,055 crash victims. , 2006, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[32]  Richard W. Kent,et al.  Age-related Changes in the Effective Stiffness of the Human Thorax Using Four Loading Conditions , 2003 .

[33]  Jeffrey Richard Crandall,et al.  Kinematics of the thorax under dynamic belt loading conditions , 2010 .

[34]  A. Cappozzo,et al.  Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 1: theoretical background. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[35]  Jason Forman,et al.  Whole-body kinematic and dynamic response of restrained PMHS in frontal sled tests. , 2006, Stapp car crash journal.

[36]  Jeffrey Richard Crandall,et al.  Responses of Hybrid-III 50th and Thor-NT 50th in Sled Tests With Different Seat Belt Pretensioner Configurations , 2006 .

[37]  U.D. Croce,et al.  Surface-marker cluster design criteria for 3-D bone movement reconstruction , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[38]  F Bendjellal,et al.  Comparison of Thoracic Injury Risk in Frontal Car Crashes for Occupant Restrained without Belt Load Limiters and Those Restrained with 6 kN and 4 kN Belt Load Limiters. , 2001, Stapp car crash journal.

[39]  Ola Boström,et al.  Benefits of a 3+2 point belt system and an inboard torso side support in frontal, far-side and rollover crashes , 2003 .

[40]  Fumio Matsuoka,et al.  On the fatal crash experience of older drivers. , 2005, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.

[41]  Jason Forman,et al.  Rear seat occupant safety: an investigation of a progressive force-limiting, pretensioning 3-point belt system using adult PMHS in frontal sled tests. , 2009, Stapp car crash journal.