Bone suppressed images improve radiologists' detection performance for pulmonary nodules in chest radiographs.

OBJECTIVES To assess the effect of bone suppression imaging on observer performance in detecting lung nodules in chest radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS Posteroanterior (PA) and lateral digital chest radiographs of 111 (average age 65) patients with a CT proven solitary nodule (median diameter 15 mm), and 189 (average age 63) controls were read by 5 radiologists and 3 residents. Conspicuity of nodules on the radiographs was classified in obvious (n = 32), moderate (n = 32), subtle (n = 29) and very subtle (n = 18). Observers read the PA and lateral chest radiographs without and with an additional PA bone suppressed image (BSI) (ClearRead Bone Suppression 2.4, Riverain Technologies, Ohio) within one reading session. Multi reader multi case (MRMC) receiver operating characteristics (ROC) were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS ROC analysis showed improved detection with use of BSI compared to chest radiographs alone (AUC = 0.883 versus 0.855; p = 0.004). Performance also increased at high specificities exceeding 80% (pAUC = 0.136 versus 0.124; p = 0.0007). Operating at a specificity of 90%, sensitivity increased with BSI from 66% to 71% (p = 0.0004). Increase of detection performance was highest for nodules with moderate and subtle conspicuity (p = 0.02; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION Bone suppressed images improve radiologists' detection performance for pulmonary nodules, especially for those of moderate and subtle conspicuity.

[1]  B. van Ginneken,et al.  Screening for lung cancer with digital chest radiography: sensitivity and number of secondary work-up CT examinations. , 2010, Radiology.

[2]  T. Ishigaki,et al.  One-shot dual-energy subtraction imaging. , 1986, Radiology.

[3]  Peter Vock,et al.  Improved detection of pulmonary nodules on energy-subtracted chest radiographs with a commercial computer-aided diagnosis software: comparison with human observers , 2009, European Radiology.

[4]  P C Prorok,et al.  Lung cancer mortality in the Mayo Lung Project: impact of extended follow-up. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[5]  J. V. van Engelshoven,et al.  Miss rate of lung cancer on the chest radiograph in clinical practice. , 1999, Chest.

[6]  J. Austin,et al.  Missed non-small cell lung cancer: radiographic findings of potentially resectable lesions evident only in retrospect. , 2003, Radiology.

[7]  J. Austin,et al.  Glossary of terms for CT of the lungs: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the Fleischner Society. , 1996, Radiology.

[8]  C E Metz,et al.  Variance-component modeling in the analysis of receiver operating characteristic index estimates. , 1997, Academic radiology.

[9]  Heinz-Otto Peitgen,et al.  Morphological segmentation and partial volume analysis for volumetry of solid pulmonary lesions in thoracic CT scans , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  W. E. Miller,et al.  Lung cancer detected during a screening program using four-month chest radiographs. , 1983, Radiology.

[11]  J. Gohagan,et al.  Screening by chest radiograph and lung cancer mortality: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) randomized trial. , 2011, JAMA.

[12]  Jens Ricke,et al.  CsI-detector-based dual-exposure dual energy in chest radiography for lung nodule detection: results of an international multicenter trial , 2008, European Radiology.

[13]  Heber MacMahon,et al.  Improved detection of focal pneumonia by chest radiography with bone suppression imaging , 2012, European Radiology.

[14]  Kunio Doi,et al.  Small lung cancers: improved detection by use of bone suppression imaging--comparison with dual-energy subtraction chest radiography. , 2011, Radiology.

[15]  Kunio Doi,et al.  Improved detection of subtle lung nodules by use of chest radiographs with bone suppression imaging: receiver operating characteristic analysis with and without localization. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  A. Porcel,et al.  Characteristics of missed lung cancer on chest radiographs: a French experience , 2001, European Radiology.

[17]  Stephen L Hillis,et al.  Recent developments in the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz procedure for multireader ROC study analysis. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[18]  K. Berbaum,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. , 1992, Investigative radiology.

[19]  M. Gotway,et al.  Features of non-small cell lung carcinomas overlooked at digital chest radiography. , 2008, Clinical radiology.

[20]  Shih-Chung Benedict Lo,et al.  Lung nodules: improved detection with software that suppresses the rib and clavicle on chest radiographs. , 2011, Radiology.

[21]  M. Miyagawa,et al.  Detection of lung cancer using single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography , 2007, Radiation Medicine.

[22]  B J Flehinger,et al.  Non-small-cell lung cancer: results of the New York screening program. , 1984, Radiology.

[23]  K Awai,et al.  Detection of small pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs: efficacy of dual-energy subtraction technique using flat-panel detector chest radiography. , 2010, Clinical radiology.

[24]  C. Gatsonis,et al.  Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening , 2012 .

[25]  M. Melamed,et al.  The effect of surgical treatment on survival from early lung cancer. Implications for screening. , 1992, Chest.