High Precision UTDR Measurements by Sonic Velocity Compensation with Reference Transducer

An ultrasonic sensor design with sonic velocity compensation is developed to improve the accuracy of distance measurement in membrane modules. High accuracy real-time distance measurements are needed in membrane fouling and compaction studies. The benefits of the sonic velocity compensation with a reference transducer are compared to the sonic velocity calculated with the measured temperature and pressure using the model by Belogol'skii, Sekoyan et al. In the experiments the temperature was changed from 25 to 60 °C at pressures of 0.1, 0.3 and 0.5 MPa. The set measurement distance was 17.8 mm. Distance measurements with sonic velocity compensation were over ten times more accurate than the ones calculated based on the model. Using the reference transducer measured sonic velocity, the standard deviations for the distance measurements varied from 0.6 to 2.0 μm, while using the calculated sonic velocity the standard deviations were 21–39 μm. In industrial liquors, not only the temperature and the pressure, which were studied in this paper, but also the properties of the filtered solution, such as solute concentration, density, viscosity, etc., may vary greatly, leading to inaccuracy in the use of the Belogol'skii, Sekoyan et al. model. Therefore, calibration of the sonic velocity with reference transducers is needed for accurate distance measurements.

[1]  William B. Krantz,et al.  Real-time measurement of inorganic fouling of RO desalination membranes using ultrasonic time-domain reflectometry , 1999 .

[2]  S.T.V. Sim,et al.  Monitoring of colloidal fouling and its associated metastability using Ultrasonic Time Domain Reflectometry , 2012 .

[3]  S.T.V. Sim,et al.  Monitoring membrane biofouling via ultrasonic time-domain reflectometry enhanced by silica dosing , 2013 .

[4]  R. Sanderson,et al.  Ultrasonic time-domain reflectometry as a non-destructive instrumental visualization technique to monitor inorganic fouling and cleaning on reverse osmosis membranes , 2002 .

[5]  S.T.V. Sim,et al.  Development of a new technique to predict reverse osmosis fouling , 2013 .

[6]  William B. Krantz,et al.  Real-Time Nondestructive Characterization of Membrane Compaction and Fouling , 1995 .

[7]  William B. Krantz,et al.  Investigation of membrane fouling and cleaning using ultrasonic time-domain reflectometry , 2000 .

[8]  Johannes S. Vrouwenvelder,et al.  The Membrane Fouling Simulator: A practical tool for fouling prediction and control , 2006 .

[9]  S. S. Sekoyan,et al.  Pressure dependence of the sound velocity in distilled water , 1999 .

[10]  Vicki Chen,et al.  Non-invasive observation of synthetic membrane processes – a review of methods , 2004 .

[11]  R. Sanderson,et al.  Development of an ultrasonic technique for in situ investigating the properties of deposited protein during crossflow ultrafiltration. , 2005, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[12]  The influence of filler concentration on the compaction and filtration properties of Zirfon®-composite ultrafiltration membranes , 2001 .

[13]  H. Strathmann,et al.  Use of ultrasonic time-domain reflectometry for real-time measurement of thickness changes during evaporative casting of polymeric films , 1998 .

[14]  William B. Krantz,et al.  Use of ultrasonic TDR for real-time noninvasive measurement of compressive strain during membrane compaction , 1998 .

[15]  Johannes S. Vrouwenvelder,et al.  The Membrane Fouling Simulator as a new tool for biofouling control of spiral-wound membranes , 2007 .

[16]  W. Krantz,et al.  Ultrasound, gravimetric, and SEM studies of inorganic fouling in spiral-wound membrane modules , 2007 .

[17]  M.C.M. van Loosdrecht,et al.  Early warning of biofouling in spiral wound nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes , 2011 .

[18]  A. Mikkola,et al.  Reversible and irreversible compaction of ultrafiltration membranes , 2013 .