Features and Pitfalls that Users Should Seek in Natural Language Interfaces to Databases

Natural Language Interfaces to Databases (NLIDBs) are tools that can be useful in making decisions, allowing different types of users to get information they need using natural language communication. Despite their important features and that for more than 50 years NLIDBs have been developed, their acceptance by end users is very low due to extremely complex problems inherent to natural language, their customization and internal operation, which has produced poor performance regarding queries correctly translated. This chapter presents a study on the main desirable features that NLIDBs should have as well as their pitfalls, describing some study cases that occur in some interfaces to illustrate the flaws of their approach.

[1]  Alessandro Moschitti,et al.  Translating Questions to SQL Queries with Generative Parsers Discriminatively Reranked , 2012, COLING.

[2]  Elena G. Sokolova,et al.  User Query Understanding by the InBASE System as a Source for a Multilingual NL Generation Module , 2002, TSD.

[3]  Xiaofeng Meng,et al.  NChiql: The Chinese Natural Language Interface to Databases , 2001, DEXA.

[4]  Gary Geunbae Lee,et al.  Multilingual Question Answering with High Portability on Relational Databases , 2002, COLING 2002.

[5]  Raymond J. Mooney,et al.  Using Multiple Clause Constructors in Inductive Logic Programming for Semantic Parsing , 2001, ECML.

[6]  Dan Klein,et al.  Learning Dependency-Based Compositional Semantics , 2011, CL.

[7]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Inducing Probabilistic CCG Grammars from Logical Form with Higher-Order Unification , 2010, EMNLP.

[8]  László Kovács.  SQL Generation for Natural Language Interface , 2011 .

[9]  Hwee Tou Ng,et al.  A Generative Model for Parsing Natural Language to Meaning Representations , 2008, EMNLP.

[10]  A R Rodolfo Pazos,et al.  Natural Language Interfaces to Databases: An Analysis of the State of the Art , 2013, HIS 2013.

[11]  Rohit J. Kate,et al.  Using String-Kernels for Learning Semantic Parsers , 2006, ACL.

[12]  Ming-Wei Chang,et al.  Driving Semantic Parsing from the World’s Response , 2010, CoNLL.

[13]  Lluís Padró,et al.  FreeLing 3.0: Towards Wider Multilinguality , 2012, LREC.

[14]  Richard Power,et al.  Composing Questions through Conceptual Authoring , 2007, CL.

[15]  P. J. Price,et al.  Evaluation of Spoken Language Systems: the ATIS Domain , 1990, HLT.

[16]  A R Rodolfo Pazos,et al.  Semantic model for improving the performance of natural language interfaces to databases , 2011, MICAI 2011.

[17]  Parteek Bhatia,et al.  HINDI LANGUAGE INTERFACE TO DATABASES , 2011 .

[18]  João C. O. Matias,et al.  Edite - A Natural Language Interface to Databases A new dimension for an old approach , 1997 .