Call-note discriminations in black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus).

Bioacousticians (M.S. Ficken, S. R. Ficken, & S. R. Witken, 1978) classified black-capped chickadee call notes from the chick-a-dee call complex into 4 note types (A, B, C, and D) identified from sound spectrograms. In Experiment 1, chickadees (Poecile atricapillus) learned operant auditory discriminations both within and between the 4 note types but learned the between note-type discrimination significantly faster. In Experiment 2, when the original, unrewarded between-category exemplars were replaced with novel, rewarded exemplars of these same categories, chickadees showed transfer of inhibitory stimulus control to the novel exemplars. In Experiment 3, when novel exemplars were replaced by the original exemplars, chickadees showed propagation of positive stimulus control back to the original exemplars. This evidence suggests that chickadees and bioacousticians accurately sort conspecific call notes into the same open-ended categories (R. J. Herrnstein, 1990).

[1]  Edward A. Wasserman,et al.  Categorical discrimination and generalization in pigeons all negative stimuli are not created equal , 1992 .

[2]  R. Weisman,et al.  NOTE TYPES, HARMONIC STRUCTURE, AND NOTE ORDER IN THE SONGS OF ZEBRA FINCHES (TAENIOPYGIA GUTTATA) , 1999 .

[3]  R. J. Herrnstein,et al.  Levels of stimulus control: A functional approach , 1990, Cognition.

[4]  Sidarta Ribeiro,et al.  Toward a Song Code Evidence for a Syllabic Representation in the Canary Brain , 1998, Neuron.

[5]  R. Rescorla Pavlovian conditioned inhibition , 1969 .

[6]  Robert W. Ficken,et al.  VOCAL REPERTOIRE OF THE BLACK-CAPPED CHICKADEE , 1978 .

[7]  P. Marler,et al.  Avian and primate communication: The problem of natural categories , 1982, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[8]  R. Weisman,et al.  Song-note discriminations in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata): Categories and pseudocategories , 1999 .

[9]  R J Herrnstein,et al.  Choosing among natural stimuli. , 1987, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  L. Brower,et al.  A Natural Toxic Defense System: Cardenolides in Butterflies versus Birds a , 1985, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[11]  JEFFREY PODOS,et al.  Discrimination of song types and variants in song sparrows , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  Christopher B. Sturdy,et al.  DISCRIMINATION OF AUDITORY DISTANCE CUES BY BLACK-CAPPED CHICKADEES (POECILE ATRICAPILLUS) AND ZEBRA FINCHES (TAENIOPYGIA GUTTATA) , 1998 .

[13]  J. Hailman,et al.  The ‘chick-a-dee’ calls of Parus atricapillus: A recombinant system of animal communication compared with written English , 1985 .