Space Use and Habitat Selection by Female Louisiana Black Bears in the Tensas River Basin of Louisiana

Abstract Studies of space use and habitat selection of endangered species are useful for identifying factors that influence fitness of individuals and viability of populations. However, there is a lack of published information regarding these behaviors for the federally threatened Louisiana black bear (Ursus americanus luteolus). We documented space use and habitat selection for 28 female black bears in 2 subpopulations of the Tensas River Basin population in northeast Louisiana, USA. The Tensas subpopulation inhabits a relatively large (>300-km2) contiguous area of bottomland hardwood forest, whereas the Deltic subpopulation exists mainly in 2 small (<7-km2) forested patches surrounded by an agricultural matrix. Females on Deltic maintained smaller seasonal and annual home ranges than females on Tensas (all P < 0.04), except for females with cubs during spring. On Tensas, females with cubs maintained smaller home ranges than females without cubs during spring (P = 0.01), but we did not detect this difference on Deltic or in other seasons. Females on Tensas and Deltic exhibited differences in habitat selection when establishing home ranges and within home ranges (P < 0.001). Deltic females selected mature bottomland hardwood forests and avoided agricultural habitats at both spatial scales. Tensas females selected a mixture of swamps, mature and regenerating forests, and exhibited variation in selection across scale, season, and reproductive status. We suggest that differences in space use and habitat selection between Tensas and Deltic are at least partially due to habitat differences at the landscape (i.e., amount of forested habitat) and patch (i.e., food availability) scales. Our results contribute to the understanding of factors that influence space use and habitat selection by black bears and provide specific information on habitat types selected by Louisiana black bears to agencies involved in habitat protection and restoration for this threatened subspecies.

[1]  R. Powell,et al.  An Evaluation of the Accuracy of Kernel Density Estimators for Home Range Analysis , 1996 .

[2]  M. Willig,et al.  An Experimental Analysis of Social Spacing in Tamias Striatus , 1982 .

[3]  R. Hamilton,et al.  Denning and Related Activities of Black Bears in the Coastal Plain of North Carolina , 1980 .

[4]  S. Fretwell,et al.  On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds , 1969 .

[5]  J. Landers,et al.  Foods and Habitat of Black Bears in Southeastern North Carolina , 1979 .

[6]  R. Swihart.  On testing for independence of animal movements , 1997 .

[7]  Jon E. Swenson,et al.  Home ranges in adult Scandinavian brown bears (Ursus arctos): effect of mass, sex, reproductive category, population density and habitat type , 2003 .

[8]  L. Conner,et al.  Using Euclidean Distances to Assess Nonrandom Habitat Use , 2001 .

[9]  A. Thesis.  FEASIBILITY OF RESTORING THE LOUISIANA BLACK BEAR (URSUS AMERICANUS LUTEOLUS) TO PORTIONS OF THEIR HISTORIC RANGE , 2003 .

[10]  John W. Zimmerman,et al.  Ecology and Behaviour of North American Black Bears: Home Ranges, Habitat and Social Organization , 1996 .

[11]  G. Alt.  Black bear cub mortality due to flooding of natal dens , 1984 .

[12]  M. W. Perkins,et al.  HABITAT USE OF FOX SQUIRRELS IN SOUTHWESTERN GEORGIA , 2004 .

[13]  J. D. Clark,et al.  Estimating black bear population density and genetic diversity at Tensas River, Louisiana using microsatellite DNA markers , 2003 .

[14]  E. C. Meslow,et al.  Habitat selection by female black bears in the central Cascades of Oregon , 1999 .

[15]  M. Cunningham,et al.  SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF AN ISOLATED FLORIDA BLACK BEAR POPULATION , 2003 .

[16]  J. F. Benson,et al.  Food Habits of Louisiana Black Bears (Ursus americanus luteolus) in Two Subpopulations of the Tensas River Basin , 2006 .

[17]  F. Lindzey,et al.  Home Range and Habitat Use by Black Bears in Southwestern Washington , 1977 .

[18]  O. Liberg,et al.  Experimental evidence for density-dependence of home-range size in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.): a comparison of two long-term studies , 2004, Oecologia.

[19]  J. F. Benson.  Ecology and conservation of Louisiana black bears in the Tensas River Basin and reintroduced populations , 2005 .

[20]  M. R. Pelton,et al.  Denning Ecology of Black Bears in the Tensas River Basin of Louisiana , 1994 .

[21]  E. Hellgren,et al.  Macrohabitat use by black bears in a southeastern wetland , 1991 .

[22]  C. Krebs,et al.  THE EFFECT OF EXTRA FOOD ON SMALL RODENT POPULATIONS: II. VOLES (MICROTUS TOWNSENDII) , 1981 .

[23]  J. F. Benson,et al.  Regulation of space use in a solitary felid: population density or prey availability? , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  L. Rogers.  Effects of Food Supply and Kinship on Social Behavior Movements and Population Growth of Black Bears in Northeastern Minnesota USA , 1987 .

[25]  W. H. Burt.  Territoriality and Home Range Concepts as Applied to Mammals , 1943 .

[26]  J. A. Litvaitis,et al.  Bobcat Habitat Use and Home Range Size in Relation to Prey Density , 1986 .

[27]  L. Mike Conner,et al.  A COMPARISON OF DISTANCE-BASED AND CLASSIFICATION-BASED ANALYSES OF HABITAT USE , 2003 .

[28]  W. Gaines,et al.  Black bear resource selection in the northeast Cascades, Washington , 2003 .

[29]  Douglas H. Johnson.  THE COMPARISON OF USAGE AND AVAILABILITY MEASUREMENTS FOR EVALUATING RESOURCE PREFERENCE , 1980 .

[30]  B. Leopold,et al.  Denning ecology of black bears in the White River National Wildlife Refuge, Arkansas , 1997 .