The future of three-dimensional printing: Intellectual property or intellectual confinement?

For the first 25 years, three-dimensional printing was the domain of industrial manufacturing and engineering. Through the open-source movement and peer production, this disruptive technology has become more widely available. This article considers how the future development and use of three-dimensional printing may be facilitated or inhibited through intellectual property law and practice. Using a combination of technical, legal, and policy analysis, we conclude that the potential for patent infringement is a primary issue in the continued development of three-dimensional printing technology. When it comes to the printed objects themselves, copyright issues will be the main focus of this debate. As these issues become more pervasive, some copyright holders will find technology-based solutions to enforce copyright laws and restrict printing activities. A common recourse is digital rights management as a means for protecting intellectual property, but its use has the potential for imposing unnecessarily stringent limitations on the use of three-dimensional printing.

[1]  Henry Jenkins Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century , 2006 .

[2]  D. Brean Asserting Patents to Combat Infringement via 3D Printing: It's No 'Use' , 2012 .

[3]  H. Chesbrough The Era of Open Innovation , 2003 .

[4]  Eric Paulos,et al.  Rise of the expert amateur: DIY projects, communities, and cultures , 2010, NordiCHI.

[5]  M. Sterling,et al.  “Let’s try this again” , 2024, Apprendre et enseigner aujourd’hui: Revue du Conseil pédagogique interdisciplinaire du Québec.

[6]  T Takahashi,et al.  [Cultural anthropology. 2]. , 1968, [Kango kyoiku] Japanese journal of nurses' education.

[7]  Jutta Haider,et al.  Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice , 2008, J. Documentation.

[8]  G. Ritzer,et al.  Production, Consumption, Prosumption , 2010 .

[9]  Creative Commons About the licenses , 2015 .

[10]  Gabriella Coleman,et al.  CODE IS SPEECH: Legal Tinkering, Expertise, and Protest among Free and Open Source Software Developers , 2009 .

[11]  Karen McCutcheon,et al.  Terms and conditions. , 2017, Molecular cell.

[12]  D. Zwick,et al.  Putting Consumers to Work , 2008 .

[13]  James Boyle,et al.  The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain , 2003 .

[14]  Davis Doherty Downloading Infringement: Patent Law as a Roadblock to the 3D Printing Revolution , 2012 .

[15]  Christopher Kelty,et al.  Geeks, Social Imaginaries, and Recursive Publics , 2005 .