Joint Failure Importance for Noncoherent Fault Trees

There exist several risk importance measures in the literature to rank the relative importance among basic events within a fault tree. Most of the importance measures indicate how important a basic event is with respect to the top event of the fault tree. However, the mutual influence among the basic events should also be considered. This is particularly true in practice when making maintenance decisions with a limited resource. This paper investigates the Joint Failure Importance (JFI), which reflects the interaction among basic events, namely, the change in the Birnbaum Importance of one basic event when the probability of another basic event changes. Even though the JFI for coherent fault trees and its properties have been examined in the literature, the results cannot be easily extended to noncoherent fault trees. The current work has shown that, for both coherent, and noncoherent fault trees, the sign of the JFI can provide useful information. However, the properties of the JFI for noncoherent fault trees are more complex, and do not always share with those for coherent fault trees. The Shutdown System Number One (SDS1) in a Canadian Deuterium-Uranium (CANDU) Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) is utilized to illustrate the theoretical results developed in this paper.

[1]  M. van der Borst,et al.  An overview of PSA importance measures , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[2]  M. O. Locks Synthesis of Fault Trees: An Example of Noncoherence , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[3]  Michael J. Armstrong Joint reliability-importance of components , 1995 .

[4]  Peter S. Jackson On the s-Importance of Elements and Prime Implicants of Non-Coherent Systems , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[5]  Richard E. Barlow,et al.  Statistical Theory of Reliability and Life Testing: Probability Models , 1976 .

[6]  John Andrews,et al.  The use of not logic in fault tree analysis , 2001 .

[7]  F. C. Meng Comparing the importance of system components by some structural characteristics , 1996, IEEE Trans. Reliab..

[8]  M. Cheok,et al.  Use of importance measures in risk-informed regulatory applications , 1998 .

[9]  John D. Andrews,et al.  Importance measures for noncoherent-system analysis , 2003, IEEE Trans. Reliab..

[10]  C. Lie,et al.  Joint reliability-importance of two edges in an undirected network , 1993 .

[11]  Gary J. Powers,et al.  Computer-aided Synthesis of Fault-trees , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[12]  M. V. Bonaca Living probabilistic safety assessment for nuclear power plant management : a report , 1992 .

[13]  John D. Andrews,et al.  Birnbaum's measure of component importance for noncoherent systems , 2003, IEEE Trans. Reliab..

[14]  Kishor S. Trivedi,et al.  Importance analysis with Markov chains , 2003, Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2003..

[15]  John Andrews,et al.  Reliability and Risk Assessment , 1994 .

[16]  Lixuan Lu,et al.  Probabilistic Safety Assessment for Instrumentation and Control Systems in Nuclear Power Plants: An Overview , 2004 .