Edge loading in metal-on-metal hips: low clearance is a new risk factor

The revision rate of large head metal-on-metal and resurfacing hips are significantly higher than conventional total hip replacements. The revision of these components has been linked to high wear caused by edge loading; which occurs when the head–cup contact patch extends over the cup rim. There are two current explanations for this; first, there is loss of entrainment of synovial fluid resulting in breakdown of the lubricating film and second, edge loading results in a large local increase in contact pressure and consequent film thickness reduction at the cup rim, which causes an increase in wear. This paper develops a method to calculate the distance between the joint reaction force vector and the cup rim – the contact patch centre to rim (CPCR) distance. However, the critical distance for the risk of edge loading is the distance from the contact patch edge to rim (CPER) distance. An analysis of explanted hip components, divided into edge worn and non-edge-worn components showed that there was no statistical difference in CPCR values, but the CPER value was significantly lower for edge worn hips. Low clearance hips, which have a more conformal contact, have a larger diameter contact patch and thus are more at risk of edge loading for similarly positioned hips.

[1]  J. Henckel,et al.  The relationship between the angle of version and rate of wear of retrieved metal-on-metal resurfacings: a prospective, CT-based study. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[2]  J. Fisher,et al.  Metal-on-metal bearings surfaces: Materials, manufacture, design, optimization, and alternatives , 2006, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[3]  Megan K. O’Brien,et al.  Hard-on-Hard Total Hip Impingement Causes Extreme Contact Stress Concentrations , 2011, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  P. Cann,et al.  Retrieval analysis of 240 metal-on-metal hip components, comparing modular total hip replacement with hip resurfacing. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[5]  C. Heisel,et al.  Ten different hip resurfacing systems: biomechanical analysis of design and material properties , 2009, International Orthopaedics.

[6]  J. Lewis,et al.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  I. Hutchings.  Tribology: Friction and Wear of Engineering Materials , 1992 .

[8]  J Fisher,et al.  Microseparation of the centers of alumina-alumina artificial hip joints during simulator testing produces clinically relevant wear rates and patterns. , 2000, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[9]  H. Amstutz,et al.  The John Charnley Award: A Study of Implant Failure in Metal-on-Metal Surface Arthroplasties , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  T. Joyce,et al.  Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing: the influence of component type, orientation and volumetric wear. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  J Fisher,et al.  Bioengineering reasons for the failure of metal-on-metal hip prostheses: an engineer's perspective. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[12]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  Andy Taylor,et al.  The problem with large diameter metal-on-metal acetabular cup inclination. , 2009, Bulletin of the NYU hospital for joint diseases.

[14]  M. Wimmer,et al.  New insights into wear and biological effects of metal-on-metal bearings. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  M. Wimmer,et al.  Wear mechanisms in metal‐on‐metal bearings: The importance of tribochemical reaction layers , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[16]  H. Gill,et al.  Analysis of wear of retrieved metal-on-metal hip resurfacing implants revised due to pseudotumours. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[17]  T J Joyce,et al.  Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and large-diameter total hip replacement: A consequence of excess wear. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[18]  Michael M Morlock,et al.  Modes of implant failure after hip resurfacing: morphological and wear analysis of 267 retrieval specimens. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  T J Joyce,et al.  The effect of component size and orientation on the concentrations of metal ions after resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[20]  P S Walker,et al.  The tribology (friction, lubrication and wear) of all-metal artificial hip joints. 1971. , 1971, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[21]  Z. Jin,et al.  Deformation of press-fitted metallic resurfacing cups. Part 2: Finite element simulation , 2006, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[22]  P. Campbell,et al.  Revision of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: the influence of malpositioning of the components. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[23]  P. Cann,et al.  Inlet protein aggregation: a new mechanism for lubricating film formation with model synovial fluids , 2011, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[24]  J. Barbera,et al.  Contact mechanics , 1999 .

[25]  Wm. Stowe Devol.  Seventh Annual Report , 1896 .

[26]  J. Shelton,et al.  Influence of cup orientation on the wear performance of metal-on-metal hip replacements , 2009, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[27]  D. Murray.  The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[28]  P. Campbell,et al.  A study of implant failure in metal-on-metal surface arthroplasfies , 2006 .

[29]  T. Joyce,et al.  Blood metal ion concentrations after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a comparative study of articular surface replacement and Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasties. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[30]  John Fisher,et al.  High Cup Angle and Microseparation Increase the Wear of Hip Surface Replacements , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.