Source of Sustained Voltage Difference between the Xylem of a Potted Ficus benjamina Tree and Its Soil

It has long been known that there is a sustained electrical potential (voltage) difference between the xylem of many plants and their surrounding soil, but the mechanism behind this voltage has remained controversial. After eliminating any extraneous capacitive or inductive couplings and ground-mediated electric current flows, we have measured sustained differences of 50–200 mV between the xylem region of a Faraday-caged, intact, potted Ficus benjamina tree and its soil, as well as between its cut branches and soils and ionic solutions standardized to various pH values. Using identical platinum electrodes, no correlation between the voltage and time of day, illumination, sap flow, electrode elevation, or ionic composition of soil was found, suggesting no direct connection to simple dissimilar-metal redox reactions or transpirational activity. Instead, a clear relationship between the voltage polarity and magnitude and the pH difference between xylem and soil was observed. We attribute these sustained voltages to a biological concentration cell likely set up by the homeostatic mechanisms of the tree. Potential applications of this finding are briefly explored.

[1]  Mark G. Tjoelker,et al.  Universal scaling of respiratory metabolism, size and nitrogen in plants , 2006, Nature.

[2]  D. Fensom,et al.  THE BIOELECTRIC POTENTIALS OF PLANTS AND THEIR FUNCTIONAL SIGNIFICANCE: V. SOME DAILY AND SEASONAL CHANGES IN THE ELECTRICAL POTENTIAL AND RESISTANCE OF LIVING TREES , 1963 .

[3]  A. Volkov,et al.  Plant bioelectrochemistry: effects of CCCP on electrical signaling in soybean. , 2002, Bioelectrochemistry.

[4]  Dominique Gibert,et al.  Sap flow and daily electric potential variations in a tree trunk , 2006 .

[5]  L. Szarka,et al.  Annual fluctuation in amplitudes of daily variations of electrical signals measured in the trunk of a standing tree. , 2000, Comptes rendus de l'Academie des sciences. Serie III, Sciences de la vie.

[6]  K J Niklas,et al.  Invariant scaling relationships for interspecific plant biomass production rates and body size , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Daniel Y. Kwok,et al.  Electrokinetic microchannel battery by means of electrokinetic and microfluidic phenomena , 2003 .

[8]  U. Zimmermann,et al.  Simultaneous recording of xylem pressure and trans‐root potential in roots of intact glycophytes using a novel xylem pressure probe technique , 1998 .

[9]  A. Fenyvesi,et al.  Measurement of electric potential difference on trees , 2002 .

[10]  M. Kleiber.  Body size and metabolic rate. , 1947, Physiological reviews.

[11]  D. B. Fisher,et al.  Measurement of the sieve tube membrane potential. , 1981, Plant physiology.

[12]  A. Granier,et al.  electrical potential on a tree. A measurement of the sap flow , 1994 .

[13]  Park S. Nobel,et al.  Physicochemical and Environmental Plant Physiology , 1991 .

[14]  H. Jones.  Physicochemical and Environmental Plant Physiology, 2nd edn. , 1999 .

[15]  W. Gensler,et al.  Investigation of the Causative Reactant of the Apoplast Electropotentials of Plants , 1988 .

[16]  S. Petrova,et al.  ELECTRICAL PROPERTIES OF PLANT TISSUES. RESISTANCE OF A MAIZE LEAF , 2004 .