A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Three Doses of Botulinum Toxin Type A (Dysport) With Placebo in Upper Limb Spasticity After Stroke

Background and Purpose We sought to define an effective and safe dose of botulinum toxin type A (Dysport) for the treatment of upper limb muscle spasticity due to stroke. Methods This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study. Patients received either a placebo or 1 of 3 doses of Dysport (500, 1000, 1500 U) into 5 muscles of the affected arm. Efficacy was assessed periodically by the Modified Ashworth Scale and a battery of functional outcome measures. Results Eighty-three patients were recruited, and 82 completed the study. The 4 study groups were comparable at baseline with respect to their demographic characteristics and severity of spasticity. All doses of Dysport studied showed a significant reduction from baseline of muscle tone compared with placebo. However, the effect on functional disability was not statistically significant and was best at a dose of 1000 U. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in the incidence of adverse events. Conclusions The present study suggests that treatment with Dysport reduces muscle tone in patients with poststroke upper limb spasticity. Treatment was effective at doses of Dysport of 500, 1000, and 1500 U. The optimal dose for treatment of patients with residual voluntary movements in the upper limb appears to be 1000 U. Dysport is safe in the doses used in this study.

[1]  S. Hesse,et al.  Botulinum toxin type A and short-term electrical stimulation in the treatment of upper limb flexor spasticity after stroke: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial , 1998, Clinical rehabilitation.

[2]  D. Mclellan,et al.  The effectiveness of chemical neurolysis in the treatment of lower limb muscle spasticity , 1996 .

[3]  E. Tichauer Anatomic Guide for the Electromyographer , 1977 .

[4]  C. Poulos,et al.  Objective assessment of spasticity, strength, and function with early exhibition of dantrolene sodium after cerebrovascular accident: a randomized double-blind study. , 1992, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  R. Angel,et al.  Impairment of voluntary movement by spasticity , 1979, Annals of neurology.

[6]  K. Aho,et al.  Cerebrovascular disease in the community: results of a WHO collaborative study. , 1980, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[7]  N. Lincoln,et al.  Assessment of motor function in stroke patients. , 1979, Physiotherapy.

[8]  D. Wade,et al.  The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. , 1988, International disability studies.

[9]  C. Wiles,et al.  A timed test of swallowing capacity for neurological patients. , 1992, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[10]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[11]  T K Das,et al.  Effect of treatment with botulinum toxin on spasticity. , 1989, Postgraduate medical journal.

[12]  B. Bhakta,et al.  Use of botulinum toxin in stroke patients with severe upper limb spasticity. , 1996, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[13]  H. Hjaltason,et al.  A double blind, randomised, parallel group study to investigate the dose equivalence of Dysport® and Botox®in the treatment of cervical dystonia , 1998, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[14]  D. M. Simpson,et al.  Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of upper extremity spasticity , 1996, Neurology.

[15]  M. Cowan,et al.  American Heart Association. , 2018, P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management.