Fitting and testing roll-over protective structures on self-propelled agricultural machinery

Roll-Over Protective Structure (ROPS) represents the state of art for the driver’s protection in case of tractors roll-over. Despite their real risk of overturning, the ROPS approach for the Self-Propelled agricultural Machinery (SPM) is quite recent. Due to the several SPM categories available on the market, characterized by very different mass, dimension and working functions, the fitting of a ROPS and consequently the ascertainment of its protection level is quite complicated. SPM could be preliminarily divided into at least two categories: - large SPM: combine, forage, potato, sugar-beet and grape harvesters; sprayer; etc.; - small SPM: ride-on tractor, mower, comb side-delivery rake, etc. The most followed approach at present is to check preliminarily the overturning behavior of the SPM considering its longitudinal and lateral stability; if a real risk of overturning is ascertained, in order to minimize the likelihood of driver’s injury the manufacturer often installs a ROPS. The consequent need is to provide some test criteria of them. Sprayers between large SPM, and comb side-delivery rake between small SPM were the machine types on which ROPS were tested, adopting in both cases the procedure provided by Code 4 issued by the Organization for Economic and Cooperation Development (OECD), dedicated to ROPS fitted on conventional agricultural and forestry tractors. Notwithstanding the very different dimensions of these two SPM, this standard was selected considering the predictable roll-over behavior, also in relation with the front and rear track values. On the 4950 kg mass sprayer was fitted a closed cab, while on the 690 kg mass comb side-delivery rakes a 3-pillars frame was applied. In both cases the response of the tests was positive, so indicating a general suitability of OECD Code 4 to assure a ROPS good driver’s protection level in case of overturning. On the other hand, to ascertain more in detail the roll-over behavior of the SPM, some further questions need to be deeply examined, such as the driver’s place location, the height of the centre of gravity from the ground in different machine configurations (i.e. with crop tanks empty or full), the external silhouette, the axles mass distribution of the laden/unladen machine, etc.

[1]  Silvia Arazuri,et al.  Evaluation of risk factors in fatal accidents in agriculture , 2010 .

[2]  Steven A. Freeman Potential Impact of a ROPS Retrofit Policy in Central Iowa , 1999 .

[3]  C. Crandall,et al.  Farm-related injury mortality in New Mexico, 1980-91. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  John R. Myers,et al.  Roll-over Protective Structure Use and the Cost of Retrofitting Tractors in the United States, 1993 , 1995 .

[5]  D. Pessina,et al.  Il ruolo del web nel monitoraggio degli incidenti mortali dovuti a ribaltamento nei trattori agricoli , 2009 .

[6]  Equipment,et al.  A research on the evaluation of front hard point part of agricultural and forestry tractors , 2009 .

[7]  Dennis J. Murphy,et al.  Tractors and Rollover Protection in the United States , 2010, Journal of agromedicine.

[8]  George Rechnitzer,et al.  An Australian experience with tractor rollover protective structure rebate programs: process, impact and outcome evaluation. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  L M Day Farm work related fatalities among adults in Victoria, Australia: the human cost of agriculture. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Valda Rondelli,et al.  Available energy during the rollover of narrow-track wheeled agricultural tractors , 2009 .

[11]  J R Powers,et al.  Evaluating the protective capacity of two-post ROPS for a seat-belted occupant during a farm tractor overturn. , 2011, Journal of agricultural safety and health.

[12]  Lyn Fragar,et al.  Intervention strategies for the retro-fitment of Rollover Protective Structures (ROPS) and fleet characteristic, farm tractors , 2006 .

[13]  Silleli Hasan,et al.  Tarım ve Orman Traktörlerinde Ön Sert Bölgenin Değerlendirilmesi Üzerine Bir Araştırma , 2009 .

[14]  Silvia Arazuri,et al.  Assessing the safety provided by SAE J2194 Standard and Code 4 Standard code for testing ROPS, using finite element analysis , 2010 .

[15]  Mariusz Ptak,et al.  Simulation tests of roll-over protection structure , 2013 .

[16]  Barbara C. Lee,et al.  Sweden’s Thirty-year Experience with Tractor Rollovers , 1998 .

[17]  C. Jarén,et al.  A Proposal to Improve the SAE Standard and OECD Code 4 Standard Code for Testing ROPS , 2011 .

[18]  M L Myers Prevention effectiveness of rollover protective structures--Part I: Strategy evolution. , 2000, Journal of agricultural safety and health.

[19]  S J Reynolds,et al.  Effectiveness of roll-over protective structures in reducing farm tractor fatalities. , 2000, American journal of preventive medicine.

[20]  J R Etherton,et al.  ROPS performance during field upset and static testing. , 2010, Journal of agricultural safety and health.