Multivariate Approaches to Understanding Aphasia and its Neural Substrates

Purpose of ReviewAphasia is often characterized in terms of subtype and severity, yet these constructs have limited explanatory power, because aphasia is inherently multifactorial both in its neural substrates and in its symptomatology. The purpose of this review is to survey current and emerging multivariate approaches to understanding aphasia.Recent FindingsTechniques such as factor analysis and principal component analysis have been used to define latent underlying factors that can account for performance on batteries of speech and language tests, and for characteristics of spontaneous speech production. Multivariate lesion-symptom mapping has been shown to outperform univariate approaches to lesion-symptom mapping for identifying brain regions where damage is associated with specific speech and language deficits. It is increasingly clear that structural damage results in functional changes in wider neural networks, which mediate speech and language outcomes.SummaryMultivariate statistical approaches are essential for understanding the complex relationships between the neural substrates of aphasia, and resultant profiles of speech and language function.

[1]  W. Hays Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[2]  Christoph Sperber,et al.  Impact of correction factors in human brain lesion‐behavior inference , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[3]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Statistical learning theory , 1998 .

[4]  Cathy J. Price,et al.  The PLORAS Database: A data repository for Predicting Language Outcome and Recovery After Stroke☆ , 2016, NeuroImage.

[5]  Myrna F. Schwartz,et al.  The ins and outs of meaning: Behavioral and neuroanatomical dissociation of semantically-driven word retrieval and multimodal semantic recognition in aphasia , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  D. Caplan,et al.  Dissociations and associations of performance in syntactic comprehension in aphasia and their implications for the nature of aphasic deficits , 2013, Brain and Language.

[7]  MacDonald Critchley,et al.  Aphasia in Adults , 1965 .

[8]  L. Bonilha,et al.  Subcortical damage and white matter disconnection associated with non-fluent speech. , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  D. Poeppel,et al.  The cortical organization of speech processing , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[10]  Diana Adler,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 2016 .

[11]  Richard J. S. Wise,et al.  Task-induced brain activity in aphasic stroke patients: what is driving recovery? , 2014, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  Parashkev Nachev,et al.  The dimensionalities of lesion-deficit mapping , 2017, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  Luise Springer,et al.  The Comprehensive Aphasia Test: A review. Commentary on Howard, Swinburn, and Porter, “Putting the CAT out: What the Comprehensive Aphasia Test has to offer” , 2010 .

[14]  Michael Weiner,et al.  Automated MRI-based classification of primary progressive aphasia variants , 2009, NeuroImage.

[15]  A. Kertesz,et al.  Numerical taxonomy of aphasia , 1977, Brain and Language.

[16]  P. Marié,et al.  La troisième circonvolution frontale gauche ne joue aucun rôle spécial dans la fonction de langage , 1906 .

[17]  D. Mirman,et al.  Neural Organization of Spoken Language Revealed by Lesion-Symptom Mapping , 2015, Nature Communications.

[18]  T. Parrish,et al.  Right Hemisphere Grey Matter Volume and Language Functions in Stroke Aphasia , 2017, Neural plasticity.

[19]  B. Hilbig,et al.  Multinomial processing tree models: A review of the literature. , 2009 .

[20]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Chronic post-stroke aphasia severity is determined by fragmentation of residual white matter networks , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[21]  M Corbetta,et al.  Behavioural clusters and predictors of performance during recovery from stroke , 2016, Nature Human Behaviour.

[22]  G. Waters,et al.  A study of syntactic processing in aphasia II: Neurological aspects , 2004, Brain and Language.

[23]  E. Metter,et al.  Factor-derived categories of chronic aphasia , 1982, Brain and Language.

[24]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. , 1999 .

[25]  S. Thompson-Schill,et al.  Reworking the language network , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  G. Hickok The cortical organization of speech processing: feedback control and predictive coding the context of a dual-stream model. , 2012, Journal of communication disorders.

[27]  F. Dick,et al.  Voxel-based lesion–symptom mapping , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  B. Miller,et al.  Variable disruption of a syntactic processing network in primary progressive aphasia. , 2016, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[29]  H. Duffau,et al.  Rethinking voxel-wise lesion-deficit analysis: A new challenge for computational neuropsychology , 2015, Cortex.

[30]  Parashkev Nachev,et al.  Space and the parietal cortex , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  Cathy J. Price,et al.  Predicting outcome and recovery after stroke with lesions extracted from MRI images , 2013, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[32]  J. Wepman,et al.  Dimensions of language performance in aphasia. , 1961, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[33]  N. Geschwind Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man. II. , 1965, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[34]  M. Edelen,et al.  Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement , 2007, Quality of Life Research.

[35]  Stephen M. Wilson,et al.  Convergence of spoken and written language processing in the superior temporal sulcus , 2018, NeuroImage.

[36]  G. Porter,et al.  The Comprehensive Aphasia Test , 2005 .

[37]  N. Geschwind Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man. I. , 1965, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[38]  Rong Chen,et al.  Voxelwise Bayesian lesion-deficit analysis , 2008, NeuroImage.

[39]  Cathy J. Price,et al.  A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading , 2012, NeuroImage.

[40]  B. Miller,et al.  The neural basis of surface dyslexia in semantic dementia. , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[41]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  AphasiaBank as BigData , 2016, Seminars in Speech and Language.

[42]  William D. Hula,et al.  Item Response Theory Modeling of the Philadelphia Naming Test. , 2015, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[43]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Assessing the Clinical Effect of Residual Cortical Disconnection After Ischemic Strokes , 2014, Stroke.

[44]  Anna M. Woollams,et al.  Capturing multidimensionality in stroke aphasia: mapping principal behavioural components to neural structures , 2014, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[45]  D. Crockett,et al.  Factor analysis of the Porch Index of Communication Ability , 1979, Brain and Language.

[46]  C. Velozo,et al.  Development of a short form of the Boston naming test for individuals with aphasia. , 2011, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[47]  R. Nass,et al.  The assessment of aphasia and related disorders By Harold Goodglass and edith kaplan philadelphia, lea & febiger, 1983 illustrated, $27.50 (package) , 1984 .

[48]  R. Marttila,et al.  [Aphasia in adults]. , 1992, Duodecim; laaketieteellinen aikakauskirja.

[49]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Voxel-Based Morphometry—The Methods , 2000, NeuroImage.

[50]  H. Karnath,et al.  Using human brain lesions to infer function: a relic from a past era in the fMRI age? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[51]  M. Schwartz,et al.  Multivariate lesion‐symptom mapping using support vector regression , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[52]  J. Mohr,et al.  Broca’s Area and Broca’s Aphasia (1976) , 2006 .

[53]  G. Dell,et al.  A Case-Series Test of the Interactive Two-step Model of Lexical Access: Predicting Word Repetition from Picture Naming. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.

[54]  Nan Bernstein Ratner,et al.  Your Laptop to the Rescue: Using the Child Language Data Exchange System Archive and CLAN Utilities to Improve Child Language Sample Analysis , 2016, Seminars in Speech and Language.

[55]  G. Rees,et al.  Human brain lesion-deficit inference remapped , 2014, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[56]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  On the low dimensionality of behavioral deficits and alterations of brain network connectivity after focal injury , 2018, Cortex.

[57]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Re-emergence of modular brain networks in stroke recovery , 2018, Cortex.

[58]  Andrew T DeMarco,et al.  A multivariate lesion symptom mapping toolbox and examination of lesion‐volume biases and correction methods in lesion‐symptom mapping , 2018, Human brain mapping.

[59]  Daniel Mirman,et al.  Relative contributions of lesion location and lesion size to predictions of varied language deficits in post-stroke aphasia , 2018, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[60]  Joseph C. Griffis,et al.  Linking left hemispheric tissue preservation to fMRI language task activation in chronic stroke patients , 2017, Cortex.

[61]  Stefan Klöppel,et al.  Early functional magnetic resonance imaging activations predict language outcome after stroke. , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[62]  D. Crockett,et al.  Empirically derived groups in the assessment of recovery from aphasia , 1979, Brain and Language.

[63]  K. H. Pribram,et al.  Language and Language Disturbances , 1949, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[64]  Brian Avants,et al.  Improved accuracy of lesion to symptom mapping with multivariate sparse canonical correlations , 2017, Neuropsychologia.

[65]  Peter E Turkeltaub,et al.  Are networks for residual language function and recovery consistent across aphasic patients? , 2011, Neurology.

[66]  Grant M. Walker,et al.  Anterior temporal involvement in semantic word retrieval: voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping evidence from aphasia. , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[67]  E. Chang,et al.  Transient aphasias after left hemisphere resective surgery. , 2015, Journal of neurosurgery.

[68]  W. Batchelder Multinomial processing tree models and psychological assessment. , 1998 .

[69]  Scott Holland,et al.  The canonical semantic network supports residual language function in chronic post‐stroke aphasia , 2016, Human brain mapping.

[70]  Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini,et al.  Connected speech production in three variants of primary progressive aphasia. , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[71]  G. Dell,et al.  A Case-Series Test of the Interactive Two-Step Model of Lexical Access: Evidence from Picture Naming. , 2006 .

[72]  Roelien Bastiaanse,et al.  Spontaneous speech in aphasia: A correlational study , 1989, Brain and Language.

[73]  William D. Hula,et al.  The Aphasia Communication Outcome Measure (ACOM): Dimensionality, Item Bank Calibration, and Initial Validation. , 2015, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[74]  E. Kaplan,et al.  The assessment of aphasia and related disorders , 1972 .

[75]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Multivariate Connectome-Based Symptom Mapping in Post-Stroke Patients: Networks Supporting Language and Speech , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[76]  M. R. Novick,et al.  Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. , 1971 .

[77]  B. Miller,et al.  Neurodegenerative Diseases Target Large-Scale Human Brain Networks , 2009, Neuron.

[78]  Peter E Turkeltaub,et al.  Right Hemisphere Remapping of Naming Functions Depends on Lesion Size and Location in Poststroke Aphasia , 2017, Neural plasticity.

[79]  Christopher Rorden,et al.  Revealing the dual streams of speech processing , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[80]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  Enhanced estimations of post‐stroke aphasia severity using stacked multimodal predictions , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[81]  David Caplan,et al.  Factor analysis of aphasic syntactic comprehension disorders , 2006 .

[82]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Anatomy of aphasia revisited , 2018, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[83]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Predicting aphasia type from brain damage measured with structural MRI , 2015, Cortex.

[84]  Peter E. Turkeltaub,et al.  Functional activation independently contributes to naming ability and relates to lesion site in post‐stroke aphasia , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[85]  Stephen M. Wilson,et al.  Adaptive paradigms for mapping phonological regions in individual participants , 2019, NeuroImage.

[86]  Xiong Jiang,et al.  Right hemisphere grey matter structure and language outcomes in chronic left hemisphere stroke. , 2016, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[87]  F. Floyd,et al.  Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. , 1995 .

[88]  P. Turkeltaub,et al.  Mapping Common Aphasia Assessments to Underlying Cognitive Processes and Their Neural Substrates , 2017, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[89]  Richard D. Hichwa,et al.  A neural basis for lexical retrieval , 1996, Nature.

[90]  Carl D. Hacker,et al.  Common Behavioral Clusters and Subcortical Anatomy in Stroke , 2015, Neuron.

[91]  J. Carroll,et al.  A factor analysis of the Minnesota test for differential diagnosis of aphasia. , 1962, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[92]  G. Waters,et al.  A study of syntactic processing in aphasia I: Behavioral (psycholinguistic) aspects , 2004, Brain and Language.

[93]  Antonello Baldassarre,et al.  Disruptions of network connectivity predict impairment in multiple behavioral domains after stroke , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[94]  Kate Bunton,et al.  Auditory-Perceptual Rating of Connected Speech in Aphasia. , 2019, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[95]  Ajay D. Halai,et al.  Using principal component analysis to capture individual differences within a unified neuropsychological model of chronic post-stroke aphasia: Revealing the unique neural correlates of speech fluency, phonology and semantics , 2017, Cortex.

[96]  Grant M. Walker,et al.  A Cognitive Psychometric Model for Assessment of Picture Naming Abilities in Aphasia , 2018, Psychological assessment.

[97]  H. Wright,et al.  Measuring lexical diversity in narrative discourse of people with aphasia. , 2013, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[98]  C. Snow,et al.  Spontaneous speech of aphasic patients: A psycholinguistic analysis , 1975, Brain and Language.

[99]  David Rudrauf,et al.  What affects detectability of lesion–deficit relationships in lesion studies? , 2014, NeuroImage: Clinical.