Life Cycle Performance Metrics for Aging and Seismically Vulnerable Bridges

Bridge infrastructure faces both continued aging and deterioration throughout its lifetime, as well as potential exposure to natural hazards such as earthquakes in hazard prone regions. Consequential damage requires increased monetary investments, energy spent on subsequent repair/replacement, as well as carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions associated with the manufacture/transport of repair materials. This paper will derive and compare estimates of three important metrics associated with the life cycle performance of aging bridges given seismic exposure, namely, life cycle cost, embodied energy and associated CO2 emissions. A case study is presented for a representative multi-span simply supported (MSSS) concrete girder bridge to evaluate the life cycle sustainability metrics of the corroded bridge system given uncertain performance and repair under lifetime exposure to seismic hazards. The results underscore the importance of capturing the effects of time dependent structural deterioration when conducting life cycle analysis of bridges based on different indicators. The proposed framework is also anticipated to help guide the selection of optimal rehabilitation or retrofit measures for bridge infrastructure based on target sustainability metrics related to life cycle cost, energy usage, and harmful emissions.

[1]  B. V. Venkatarama Reddy,et al.  Sustainable building technologies , 2004 .

[2]  Hitoshi Furuta,et al.  Effects of Seismic Risk on Life-Cycle Cost Analysis for Bridge Maintenance , 2006 .

[3]  Mohan M. Kumaraswamy,et al.  Object-oriented framework for durability assessment and life cycle costing of highway bridges , 2005 .

[4]  T Litman,et al.  Sustainable transportation indicators: a recommended program to define a standard set of indicators for sustainable transportation planning , 2008 .

[5]  Robert E. Melchers,et al.  Structural Reliability: Analysis and Prediction , 1987 .

[6]  B. G. Nielson Analytical Fragility Curves for Highway Bridges in Moderate Seismic Zones , 2005 .

[7]  Palle Thoft-Christensen,et al.  Life-cycle cost-benefit (LCCB) analysis of bridges from a user and social point of view , 2009 .

[8]  Jamie E. Padgett,et al.  Aging Considerations in the Development of Time-Dependent Seismic Fragility Curves , 2010 .

[9]  Barry J. Adams,et al.  Developing sustainability criteria for urban infrastructure systems , 2005 .

[10]  Edwin K. L. Tam,et al.  Indicators and framework for assessing sustainable infrastructure , 2005 .

[11]  Richard C. Dorf Technology, Humans, and Society: Toward a Sustainable World , 2011 .

[12]  Christy Mihyeon Jeon,et al.  Addressing Sustainability in Transportation Systems: Definitions, Indicators, and Metrics , 2005 .

[13]  Adrian Long Sustainable bridges through innovative advances , 2008 .

[14]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Life-Cycle Cost Analysis for Bridges , 1999 .