An overview to flood vulnerability assessment methods

Vulnerability is the main construct in flood risk management. One of the most significant aims of flood vulnerability assessment is to make a clear association between the theoretical conceptions of flood vulnerability and the daily administrative process. Variety of approaches has been introduced to assess vulnerability therefore selection of more appropriate methodology is vital for authorities. The more accepted assessing methods can be categorized in four groups: curve method, disaster loos data method, computer modeling methods and indicator based methods. The purpose of this study is to review these methods and compare their benefits and drawbacks. The article concluded that the indicator-based approach gives more precise vision of overall flood vulnerability in each area rather than other approaches.

[1]  池谷 壽夫,et al.  Vulnerability: reflections on a new ethical foundation for law and politics , 2013 .

[2]  R. Connor,et al.  Development of a method for assessing flood vulnerability. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[3]  Stéphane Kluser,et al.  Reducing Disaster Risk: a challenge for development , 2004 .

[4]  Joern Birkmann,et al.  Risk and vulnerability indicators at different scales: Applicability, usefulness and policy implications , 2007 .

[5]  Ioana Popescu,et al.  Parametric and physically based modelling techniques for flood risk and vulnerability assessment: A comparison , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[6]  Roland K. Price,et al.  Urban flood disaster management , 2008 .

[7]  D. Sheridan,et al.  Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards , 2010 .

[8]  Paul Samuels,et al.  A EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE ON CURRENT CHALLENGES IN THE ANALYSIS OF INLAND FLOOD RISKS , 2006 .

[9]  Nicolas G. Wright,et al.  Reducing the complexity of the flood vulnerability index , 2010 .

[10]  I. Faisal,et al.  Non-structural flood mitigation measures for Dhaka City , 1999 .

[11]  Fei Mao,et al.  An assessment of multidimensional flood vulnerability at the provincial scale in China based on the DEA method , 2012, Natural Hazards.

[12]  M. V. Aalst,et al.  Determinants of Risk : Exposure and Vulnerability Coordinating Lead , 2011 .

[13]  D. Mileti Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States , 1999 .

[14]  C. Wannous,et al.  United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR)—UNISDR’s Contribution to Science and Technology for Disaster Risk Reduction and the Role of the International Consortium on Landslides (ICL)Open image in new window , 2017 .

[15]  David Alexander,et al.  Principles of Emergency Planning and Management , 2002 .

[16]  Shabana Khan,et al.  Vulnerability assessments and their planning implications: a case study of the Hutt Valley, New Zealand , 2012, Natural Hazards.

[17]  B. Smit,et al.  Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability , 2006 .

[18]  Mahendra Singh Nathawat,et al.  Waterlogging and flood hazards vulnerability and risk assessment in Indo Gangetic plain , 2010 .

[19]  Akhtar Ali Indus Basin Floods: Mechanisms, Impacts, and Management , 2013 .

[20]  James K. Lein,et al.  Hazard vulnerability assessment: How well does nature follow our rules? , 2010 .

[21]  F. Pergalani,et al.  An attempt to link risk assessment with land use planning: a recent experience in Italy , 1996 .

[22]  C. Aall,et al.  Data and processes linking vulnerability assessment to adaptation decision-making on climate change in Norway , 2006 .

[23]  Susan L. Cutter,et al.  Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management Vulnerability of U . S . Cities to Environmental Hazards , 2011 .

[24]  Ji-xi Gao,et al.  An assessment of flood hazard vulnerability in the Dongting Lake Region of China , 2007 .

[25]  J. St Cyr,et al.  Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management At Risk : Natural Hazards , People ' s Vulnerability , and Disasters , 2011 .

[26]  Hans-Martin Füssel,et al.  Review and Quantitative Analysis of Indices of Climate Change Exposure, Adaptive Capacity, Sensitivity, and Impacts , 2010 .

[27]  J. Maršálek,et al.  Flood Risk Management: Hazards, Vulnerability and Mitigation Measures , 2006 .

[28]  R. Kasperson,et al.  A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Slobodan P. Simonovic,et al.  Spatial and temporal analysis of urban flood risk assessment , 2013 .

[30]  Hans-Martin Füssel,et al.  How inequitable is the global distribution of responsibility, capability, and vulnerability to climate change: A comprehensive indicator-based assessment , 2010 .