Comparison between Lagrangian and Eulerian approaches in predicting motion of micron-sized particles in laminar flows

Abstract Modeling the behavior of suspended particles in gaseous phase is important for diverse reasons; e.g. aerosol is usually the main subject of CFD simulations in clean rooms. Additionally, to determine the rate and sites of deposition of particles suspended in inhaled air, the motion of the particles should be predicted in lung airways. Meanwhile there are two basically different approaches to simulate the behavior of particles suspension, Lagrangian and Eulerian approaches. This study compares the results of these two approaches on simulating the same problem. An in-house particle tracking code was developed to simulate the motion of particles with Lagrangian approach. In order to simulate the same problem with Eulerian approach, the solution to the transport equation with appropriate initial and boundary conditions was used. In the first case study, diffusion of particles, initially positioned homogeneously on an infinite plane was modeled with both approaches and the results were compared and the mismatch between Lagrangian and Eulerian approaches was analyzed for different concentrations. In the second case study, airflow with parabolic velocity profile moving between two parallel plates was modeled with two approaches. The airflow initially contained a homogeneous suspension of particles and the plates were maintained at zero concentration. The concentration along the plates was compared between the two approaches and the differences in the performance of each approach were investigated, again for different initial concentrations. The overall results confirm that as particle concentration falls below a minimum amount, approximately 105 m−2, the results of the two approaches deviate considerably from each other and hence the Eulerian approach cannot be taken as an alternative for Lagrangian approach for low concentrations. For the third problem, we investigated the 3D particle flow in an expanding lung alveolus. It is shown that when the number of total released particles increases, the results of Eulerian approach can be used as an alternative to Lagrangian simulation. Since the number of particles existing in the lung alveolus in normal condition is much lower than this value, we concluded that Eulerian method cannot be applied to problems involving low concentration of particles. Although, the results of the Lagrangian problem may converge to the Eulerian one by increasing simulation time, but it is a hypothetical situation which not really exist in short time scale problems such as third case study in this paper.

[1]  J Schwartz,et al.  Increased mortality in Philadelphia associated with daily air pollution concentrations. , 1992, The American review of respiratory disease.

[2]  A. Lai,et al.  Comparison of Three Approaches to Model Particle Penetration Coefficient through a Single Straight Crack in a Building Envelope , 2010 .

[3]  S. Chibbaro,et al.  A note on the consistency of hybrid Eulerian/Lagrangian approach to multiphase flows , 2009, 0912.2045.

[4]  S. Friedlander Smoke, Dust, and Haze: Fundamentals of Aerosol Dynamics , 2000 .

[5]  T. Poinsot,et al.  Fuel injection model for Euler–Euler and Euler–Lagrange large-eddy simulations of an evaporating spray inside an aeronautical combustor , 2011 .

[6]  Zhi Gao,et al.  Numerical analysis for evaluating the "Exposure Reduction Effectiveness" of room air cleaners , 2010 .

[7]  M. L. Laucks,et al.  Aerosol Technology Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles , 2000 .

[8]  P. Valberg,et al.  Deposition of Aerosol in the Respiratory Tract1–3 , 2015 .

[9]  W. Whyte,et al.  Experimental and CFD Airflow Studies of a Cleanroom with Special Respect to Air Supply Inlets , 2010 .

[10]  Bin Zhao,et al.  Particle dispersion and deposition in ventilated rooms: Testing and evaluation of different Eulerian and Lagrangian models , 2008 .

[11]  Shih-Cheng Hu,et al.  Design and evaluation of a minienvironment for semiconductor manufacture processes , 2002 .

[12]  Qingyan Chen,et al.  Comparison of the Eulerian and Lagrangian methods for predicting particle transport in enclosed spaces , 2007 .

[13]  G. Prisk,et al.  Importance of the bifurcation zone and branch orientation in simulated aerosol deposition in the alveolar zone of the human lung , 2006 .

[14]  Yang-Cheng Shih,et al.  Using air curtain to control pollutant spreading for emergency management in a cleanroom , 2011 .

[15]  Alvin C.K. Lai,et al.  Lagrangian Stochastic Particle Tracking: Further Discussion , 2011 .

[16]  Bin Zhao,et al.  Comparison of indoor aerosol particle concentration and deposition in different ventilated rooms by numerical method , 2004 .

[17]  R. Langer,et al.  Drug delivery and targeting. , 1998, Nature.

[18]  S. Rogak,et al.  Langrangian Stochastic Particle Tracking , 2011 .

[19]  Bin Zhao,et al.  Numerical Investigation of Particle Diffusion in a Clean Room , 2005 .