Bridging Philosophy of Technology and Neurobiological Research: Interpreting Images From the “Slam Freezer”

The swiftly growing field of neurobiological research utilizes highly advanced technologies (e.g., magnetic resonance imaging, electron microscopy) to mediate between investigators and the brains they investigate. Here, the author analyzes a device called the “slam freezer” that quick-freezes neurons to be studied under the microscope. Employing insights from Don Ihde’s philosophy of technology, work that carefully amalgamates continental philosophy with philosophy of science, the author draws out the practices of interpretation in slam-freezing research. This interdisciplinary approach to understanding scientific methodology sets the stage for further philosophical investigation of research in neuroscience.

[1]  T. A. Ryan,et al.  Targeted chemical disruption of clathrin function in living cells. , 2003, Molecular biology of the cell.

[2]  I. Hacking,et al.  Representing and Intervening. , 1986 .

[3]  F. Grohovaz,et al.  Temporal coincidence between synaptic vesicle fusion and quantal secretion of acetylcholine , 1985, The Journal of cell biology.

[4]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[5]  H. Dreyfus,et al.  Further Reflections on Heidegger, Technology, and the Everyday , 2003 .

[6]  D. Ihde.  Technology and the lifeworld : from garden to earth , 1991 .

[7]  J. Heuser.  Quick-freezing evidence in favour of the vesicular hypothesis , 1978, Trends in Neurosciences.

[8]  On the quantal mechanism of neural transmitter release , 1999 .

[9]  M. Dennis,et al.  Synaptic vesicle exocytosis captured by quick freezing and correlated with quantal transmitter release , 1979, The Journal of cell biology.

[10]  Felix Stalder,et al.  Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies , 2000, Inf. Soc..

[11]  C. Wright.  Representing and Intervening , 1985 .

[12]  J. Heuser,et al.  Endocytosis of synaptic vesicle membrane at the frog neuromuscular junction , 1984, The Journal of cell biology.

[13]  B. Katz,et al.  Local activity at a depolarized nerve‐muscle junction , 1955, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  T. Reese,et al.  Structural changes after transmitter release at the frog neuromuscular junction , 1981, The Journal of cell biology.

[15]  Don Ihde,et al.  Chasing Technoscience: Matrix for Materiality , 2006 .

[16]  T. Reese,et al.  EVIDENCE FOR RECYCLING OF SYNAPTIC VESICLE MEMBRANE DURING TRANSMITTER RELEASE AT THE FROG NEUROMUSCULAR JUNCTION , 1973, The Journal of cell biology.

[17]  J. Meldolesi,et al.  Neurotransmitter release: fusion or 'kiss-and-run'? , 1994, Trends in cell biology.

[18]  J. Meldolesi,et al.  Peeping at the vesicle kiss , 1999, Nature Cell Biology.

[19]  D. Ihde.  Expanding Hermeneutics: Visualism in Science , 1998 .

[20]  Arun Kumar Tripathi.  On the Internet: Thinking in Action , 2002 .

[21]  Don Ihde,et al.  Has the Philosophy of Technology Arrived? A State‐of‐the‐Art Review* , 2004, Philosophy of Science.

[22]  S. Schmid,et al.  Tubular membrane invaginations coated by dynamin rings are induced by GTP-γS in nerve terminals , 1995, Nature.

[23]  J. Heuser.  Quick-freeze, deep-etch preparation of samples for 3-D electron microscopy , 1981 .

[24]  A. Mauro,et al.  TURNOVER OF TRANSMITTER AND SYNAPTIC VESICLES AT THE FROG NEUROMUSCULAR JUNCTION , 1973, The Journal of cell biology.