Direct NMR observation of a substrate protein bound to the chaperonin GroEL.

The reaction cycle and the major structural states of the molecular chaperone GroEL and its cochaperone, GroES, are well characterized. In contrast, very little is known about the nonnative states of the substrate polypeptide acted on by the chaperonin machinery. In this study, we investigated the substrate protein human dihydrofolate reductase (hDHFR) while bound to GroEL or to a single-ring analog, SR1, by NMR spectroscopy in solution under conditions where hDHFR was efficiently recovered as a folded, enzymatically active protein from the stable complexes upon addition of ATP and GroES. By using the NMR techniques of transverse relaxation-optimized spectroscopy (TROSY), cross-correlated relaxation-induced polarization transfer (CRIPT), and cross-correlated relaxation-enhanced polarization transfer (CRINEPT), bound hDHFR could be observed directly. Measurements of the buildup of hDHFR NMR signals by different magnetization transfer mechanisms were used to characterize the dynamic properties of the NMR-observable parts of the bound substrate. The NMR data suggest that the bound state includes random coil conformations devoid of stable native-like tertiary contacts and that the bound hDHFR might best be described as a dynamic ensemble of randomly structured conformers.

[1]  Lewis E. Kay,et al.  Protein dynamics from NMR , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.

[2]  A. Szabó,et al.  Model-free approach to the interpretation of nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in macromolecules. 2. Analysis of experimental results , 1982 .

[3]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Chaperonin-mediated protein folding. , 2001, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[4]  C M Dobson,et al.  Characterization of a partly folded protein by NMR methods: studies on the molten globule state of guinea pig alpha-lactalbumin. , 1989, Biochemistry.

[5]  J. Sandström Dynamic NMR spectroscopy , 1982 .

[6]  G. Wider,et al.  TROSY in NMR studies of the structure and function of large biological macromolecules. , 2003, Current opinion in structural biology.

[7]  F. Hartl,et al.  Significant hydrogen exchange protection in GroEL‐bound DHFR is maintained during iterative rounds of substrate cycling , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[8]  Yechezkel Kashi,et al.  GroEL-mediated protein folding proceeds by multiple rounds of binding and release of nonnative forms , 1994, Cell.

[9]  M. Billeter,et al.  NMR studies of Brownian tumbling and internal motions in proteins , 2001 .

[10]  A. Fersht,et al.  Nature and consequences of GroEL-protein interactions. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[11]  P. Wright,et al.  Evidence for two interconverting protein isomers in the methotrexate complex of dihydrofolate reductase from Escherichia coli. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[12]  G. Wagner,et al.  Detection of long-lived bound water molecules in complexes of human dihydrofolate reductase with methotrexate and NADPH. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  J. Baum,et al.  Characterization of millisecond time-scale dynamics in the molten globule state of alpha-lactalbumin by NMR. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  F. Shewmaker,et al.  The Disordered Mobile Loop of GroES Folds into a Defined β-Hairpin upon Binding GroEL* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  C. Dobson,et al.  Conformation of GroEL-bound α-lactalbumin probed by mass spectrometry , 1994, Nature.

[16]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[17]  Kurt Wüthrich,et al.  Processing of multi-dimensional NMR data with the new software PROSA , 1992 .

[18]  G. Wagner,et al.  NMR solution structure of the antitumor compound PT523 and NADPH in the ternary complex with human dihydrofolate reductase. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[19]  G. Lorimer,et al.  A thermodynamic coupling mechanism for GroEL-mediated unfolding. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  F. Young Biochemistry , 1955, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[21]  R. Brüschweiler,et al.  Molecular dynamics monitored by cross‐correlated cross relaxation of spins quantized along orthogonal axes , 1992 .

[22]  H. Sambrook Molecular cloning : a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY , 1989 .

[23]  G. Lorimer,et al.  GroE heat-shock proteins promote assembly of foreign prokaryotic ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase oligomers in Escherichia coli , 1989, Nature.

[24]  F. Hartl,et al.  Chaperonin-mediated protein folding at the surface of groEL through a 'molten globule'-like intermediate , 1991, Nature.

[25]  R. Riek,et al.  Attenuated T2 relaxation by mutual cancellation of dipole-dipole coupling and chemical shift anisotropy indicates an avenue to NMR structures of very large biological macromolecules in solution. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Zbyszek Otwinowski,et al.  The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonln GroEL at 2.8 Å , 1994, Nature.

[27]  Jeffrey W. Peng,et al.  [20] Investigation of protein motions via relaxation measurements , 1994 .

[28]  Kurt Wüthrich,et al.  NMR analysis of a 900K GroEL–GroES complex , 2002, Nature.

[29]  G. Wider Technical aspects of NMR Spectroscopy with biological macromolecules and studies of hydration in solution , 1998 .

[30]  A. Szabó,et al.  Model-free approach to the interpretation of nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in macromolecules. 1. Theory and range of validity , 1982 .

[31]  C D Kroenke,et al.  Nuclear magnetic resonance methods for quantifying microsecond-to-millisecond motions in biological macromolecules. , 2001, Methods in enzymology.

[32]  K. Wüthrich,et al.  Destabilization of the complete protein secondary structure on binding to the chaperone GroEL , 1994, Nature.

[33]  Arthur L Horwich,et al.  Chaperonin-mediated protein folding: fate of substrate polypeptide , 2003, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[34]  P. Sigler,et al.  The Crystal Structure of a GroEL/Peptide Complex Plasticity as a Basis for Substrate Diversity , 1999, Cell.

[35]  A. Fersht,et al.  A structural model for GroEL-polypeptide recognition. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  L. Kay,et al.  Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of high-molecular-weight proteins. , 2004, Annual review of biochemistry.

[37]  D. Cowburn,et al.  NMR structure determination and investigation using a reduced proton (REDPRO) labeling strategy for proteins , 2002, FEBS letters.

[38]  F. A. Seiler,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[39]  A. Clarke,et al.  Chaperonins can catalyse the reversal of early aggregation steps when a protein misfolds. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[40]  A. Fersht,et al.  Conformational states bound by the molecular chaperones GroEL and secB: a hidden unfolding (annealing) activity. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  A. Plückthun,et al.  Thermodynamic partitioning model for hydrophobic binding of polypeptides by GroEL. II. GroEL recognizes thermally unfolded mature beta-lactamase. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[42]  K. Wüthrich,et al.  Semi-classical nuclear spin relaxation theory revisited for use with biological macromolecules , 2002 .

[43]  A. Joachimiak,et al.  Solution structures of GroEL and its complex with rhodanese from small-angle neutron scattering. , 1996, Structure.

[44]  G. Lorimer,et al.  Dynamics of the chaperonin ATPase cycle: implications for facilitated protein folding. , 1994, Science.

[45]  R. Riek,et al.  TROSY and CRINEPT: NMR with large molecular and supramolecular structures in solution. , 2000, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[46]  F. Hartl,et al.  Molecular Chaperones in the Cytosol: from Nascent Chain to Folded Protein , 2002, Science.

[47]  A. Horwich,et al.  Folding of malate dehydrogenase inside the GroEL–GroES cavity , 2001, Nature Structural Biology.

[48]  J. Weissman,et al.  Construction of single-ring and two-ring hybrid versions of bacterial chaperonin GroEL. , 1998, Methods in enzymology.

[49]  K. Furtak,et al.  Multivalent Binding of Nonnative Substrate Proteins by the Chaperonin GroEL , 2000, Cell.

[50]  A. Horwich,et al.  Native-like structure of a protein-folding intermediate bound to the chaperonin GroEL. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  K. Wüthrich,et al.  Uniform and Residue-specific 15N-labeling of Proteins on a Highly Deuterated Background , 2004, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[52]  L. Gierasch,et al.  The chaperonin GroEL binds a polypeptide in an alpha-helical conformation. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[53]  B. Farmer,et al.  High-level 2H/13C/15N labeling of proteins for NMR studies , 1995, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[54]  E. Eisenstein,et al.  The Hydrophobic Nature of GroEL-Substrate Binding (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[55]  G. Lorimer,et al.  Chaperonins facilitate the in vitro folding of monomeric mitochondrial rhodanese. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[56]  G. C. Flynn,et al.  GroEL Binds to and Unfolds Rhodanese Posttranslationally (*) , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[57]  Jocelyne Fiaux,et al.  Solution NMR techniques for large molecular and supramolecular structures. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[58]  Y. Kashi,et al.  Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release , 1994, Nature.