Multi-sensor Fusion Based on Asymmetric Decision Weighting for Robust Activity Recognition

The recognition of human activity has been deeply explored during the recent years. However, most proposed solutions are mainly devised to operate in ideal conditions, thus not addressing crucial real-world issues. One of the most prominent challenges refers to common sensor technological anomalies. Sensor faults and failures introduce variations in the measured sensor data with respect to the equivalent observations in ideal conditions. As a consequence, predefined recognition systems may potentially fail to identify actions in the anomalous sensor data. This paper presents a novel model devised to cope with the effects introduced by sensor technological anomalies. The model builds on the knowledge gained from multi-sensor configurations, through asymmetrically weighting the decisions provided at both activity and sensor levels. Insertion and rejection weighting metrics are particularly used to eventually yield a unique recognized activity. For the sake of comparison, the tolerance to sensor faults and failures of standard activity recognition systems and the new proposed model are evaluated. The results prove classic activity-aware systems to be incapable of recognition under the effects of sensor technological anomalies, while the proposed model demonstrates to be robust against both sensor faults and failures.

[1]  H.J. Stam,et al.  Automated estimation of initial and terminal contact timing using accelerometers; development and validation in transtibial amputees and controls , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[2]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[3]  Ling Bao,et al.  Activity Recognition from User-Annotated Acceleration Data , 2004, Pervasive.

[4]  Tapio Seppänen,et al.  Recognizing human motion with multiple acceleration sensors , 2001, 2001 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. e-Systems and e-Man for Cybernetics in Cyberspace (Cat.No.01CH37236).

[5]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection , 1995, IJCAI.

[6]  Héctor Pomares,et al.  Dealing with the Effects of Sensor Displacement in Wearable Activity Recognition , 2014, Sensors.

[7]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  A Hybrid Discriminative/Generative Approach for Modeling Human Activities , 2005, IJCAI.

[8]  D Roggen,et al.  Wearable Computing , 2011, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[9]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Using Mobile Phones for Activity Recognition in Parkinson’s Patients , 2012, Front. Neur..

[10]  M. Stone Asymptotics for and against cross-validation , 1977 .

[11]  Billur Barshan,et al.  Human Activity Recognition Using Inertial/Magnetic Sensor Units , 2010, HBU.

[12]  Marco Luca Sbodio,et al.  A Wearable Computing Prototype for supporting training activities in Automotive Production , 2007 .

[13]  Paul J. M. Havinga,et al.  Activity Recognition Using Inertial Sensing for Healthcare, Wellbeing and Sports Applications: A Survey , 2010, ARCS Workshops.

[14]  Merryn J Mathie,et al.  Accelerometry: providing an integrated, practical method for long-term, ambulatory monitoring of human movement , 2004, Physiological measurement.

[15]  J. D. Janssen,et al.  A triaxial accelerometer and portable data processing unit for the assessment of daily physical activity , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  Miguel A. Labrador,et al.  A Survey on Human Activity Recognition using Wearable Sensors , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[17]  Thomas G. Dietterich Multiple Classifier Systems , 2000, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[18]  Daniel Roggen,et al.  Designing and sharing activity recognition systems across platforms , 2011 .

[19]  Bernt Schiele,et al.  Scalable Recognition of Daily Activities with Wearable Sensors , 2007, LoCA.

[20]  Gerhard Tröster,et al.  Arousal pattern analysis of an Olympic champion in ski jumping , 2010 .

[21]  Hongyi Li,et al.  A method to deal with installation errors of wearable accelerometers for human activity recognition , 2011, Physiological measurement.

[22]  Peter E. Hart,et al.  Nearest neighbor pattern classification , 1967, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[23]  Tong Zhang,et al.  An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-Based Learning Methods , 2001, AI Mag..

[24]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification (2nd ed.) , 1999 .

[25]  Sergios Theodoridis,et al.  Pattern Recognition, Fourth Edition , 2008 .

[26]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods , 2000 .

[27]  Zhenyu He,et al.  Activity recognition from acceleration data based on discrete consine transform and SVM , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[28]  Michael L. Littman,et al.  Activity Recognition from Accelerometer Data , 2005, AAAI.

[29]  Ricardo Chavarriaga,et al.  On-line anomaly detection and resilience in classifier ensembles , 2013, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[30]  Gary M. Weiss,et al.  Activity recognition using cell phone accelerometers , 2011, SKDD.

[31]  Andrea Mannini,et al.  Activity recognition using a single accelerometer placed at the wrist or ankle. , 2013, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[32]  Kamiar Aminian,et al.  Ambulatory system for human motion analysis using a kinematic sensor: monitoring of daily physical activity in the elderly , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[33]  Guang-Zhong Yang,et al.  Sensor Positioning for Activity Recognition Using Wearable Accelerometers , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[34]  Lin Sun,et al.  Activity Recognition on an Accelerometer Embedded Mobile Phone with Varying Positions and Orientations , 2010, UIC.

[35]  Johannes Peltola,et al.  Activity classification using realistic data from wearable sensors , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[36]  Stephanie Schuckers,et al.  Automatic Recognition of postures and activities in stroke patients , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[37]  Daniel P. Siewiorek,et al.  Activity recognition and monitoring using multiple sensors on different body positions , 2006, International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN'06).

[38]  L. Breiman,et al.  Submodel selection and evaluation in regression. The X-random case , 1992 .

[39]  Paul Lukowicz,et al.  Performance metrics for activity recognition , 2011, TIST.

[40]  Héctor Pomares,et al.  Window Size Impact in Human Activity Recognition , 2014, Sensors.

[41]  Héctor Pomares,et al.  Daily living activity recognition based on statistical feature quality group selection , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[42]  Paul Lukowicz,et al.  Collecting complex activity datasets in highly rich networked sensor environments , 2010, 2010 Seventh International Conference on Networked Sensing Systems (INSS).

[43]  Kenneth Meijer,et al.  Activity identification using body-mounted sensors—a review of classification techniques , 2009, Physiological measurement.

[44]  Aravind Kailas Capturing basic movements for mobile platforms embedded with motion sensors , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[45]  Tatsuo Nakajima,et al.  Feature Selection and Activity Recognition from Wearable Sensors , 2006, UCS.

[46]  Héctor Pomares,et al.  Human activity recognition based on a sensor weighting hierarchical classifier , 2013, Soft Comput..

[47]  Peter H. Veltink,et al.  Ambulatory Monitoring of Activities and Motor Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[48]  Paul Lukowicz,et al.  Wearable Activity Tracking in Car Manufacturing , 2008, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[49]  Sylvain Arlot,et al.  A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection , 2009, 0907.4728.