Automated extraction of ophthalmic surgery outcomes from the electronic health record

OBJECTIVE Comprehensive analysis of ophthalmic surgical outcomes is often restricted by limited methodologies for efficiently and accurately extracting clinical information from electronic health record (EHR) systems because much is in free-text form. This study aims to utilize advanced methods to automate extraction of clinical concepts from the EHR free text to study visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP), and medication outcomes of cataract and glaucoma surgeries. METHODS Patients who underwent cataract or glaucoma surgery at an academic medical center between 2009 and 2018 were identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. Rule-based algorithms were developed and used on EHR clinical narrative text to extract intraocular lens (IOL) power and implant type, as well as to create a surgery laterality classifier. MedEx (version 1.3.7) was used on free-text clinical notes to extract information on eye medications and compared to information from medication orders. Random samples of free-text notes were reviewed by two independent masked annotators to assess inter-annotator agreement on outcome variable classification and accuracy of classifiers. VA and IOP were available from semi-structured fields. RESULTS This study cohort included 6347 unique patients, with 8550 stand-alone cataract surgeries, 451 combined cataract/glaucoma surgeries, and 961 glaucoma surgeries without concurrent cataract surgery. The rule-based laterality classifier achieved 100% accuracy compared to manual review of a sample of operative notes by independent masked annotators. For cataract surgery alone, glaucoma surgery alone, or combined cataract/glaucoma surgeries, our automated extraction algorithm achieved 99-100% accuracy compared to manual annotation of samples of notes from each group, including IOL model and IOL power for cataract surgeries, and glaucoma implant for glaucoma surgeries. For glaucoma medications, there was 90.7% inter-annotator agreement. After adjudication, 85.0% of medications identified by MedEx determined to be correct. Determination of surgical laterality enabled evaluation of pre- and postoperative VA and IOP for operative eyes. CONCLUSION This text-processing pipeline can accurately capture surgical laterality and implant model usage from free-text operative notes of cataract and glaucoma surgeries, enabling extraction of clinical outcomes including visual acuities, intraocular pressure, and medications from the EHR system. Use of this approach with EHRs to assess ophthalmic surgical outcomes can benefit research groups interested in studying the safety and clinical efficacies of different surgical approaches.

[1]  Joshua C. Denny,et al.  Extracting and standardizing medication information in clinical text – the MedEx-UIMA system , 2014, AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science.

[2]  H. Smithline,et al.  Emergency department medication lists are not accurate. , 2011, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[3]  Aaron Y. Lee,et al.  Validation of the Total Visual Acuity Extraction Algorithm (TOVA) for Automated Extraction of Visual Acuity Data From Free Text, Unstructured Clinical Records , 2017, Translational vision science & technology.

[4]  Sameer Malhotra,et al.  Problem list completeness in electronic health records: A multi-site study and assessment of success factors , 2015, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[5]  Jue Cao,et al.  Standardized Note Templates Improve Electronic Medical Record Documentation of Neurovascular Examinations for Pediatric Supracondylar Humeral Fractures , 2017, JB & JS open access.

[6]  Daniel R. Luna,et al.  Accuracy of an Electronic Problem List from Primary Care Providers and Specialists , 2013, MedInfo.

[7]  David W. Bates,et al.  An effort to improve electronic health record medication list accuracy between visits: Patients' and physicians' response , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[8]  Alexander Singer,et al.  Data quality of electronic medical records in Manitoba: do problem lists accurately reflect chronic disease billing diagnoses? , 2016, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[9]  Tina Hernandez-Boussard,et al.  Architecture and Implementation of a Clinical Research Data Warehouse for Prostate Cancer , 2018, EGEMS.

[10]  A. Kho,et al.  Creation of an Accurate Algorithm to Detect Snellen Best Documented Visual Acuity from Ophthalmology Electronic Health Record Notes , 2016, JMIR medical informatics.

[11]  L. Herrinton,et al.  Natural language processing to ascertain two key variables from operative reports in ophthalmology , 2017, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[12]  F. Jones,et al.  International Classification of Diseases , 1978 .

[13]  B. Gordon Current procedural terminology , 1966 .

[14]  A. Sommer,et al.  The 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) Database: Characteristics and Methods. , 2018, Ophthalmology.

[15]  Raymond Chow,et al.  Structured electronic operative reporting: Comparison with dictation in kidney cancer surgery , 2012, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[16]  Son Doan,et al.  Application of information technology: MedEx: a medication information extraction system for clinical narratives , 2010, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[17]  Carolyn Ford,et al.  Electronic Templates versus Dictation for the Completion of Mohs Micrographic Surgery Operative Notes , 2007, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[18]  P. Bates,et al.  'Smart' electronic operation notes in surgery: an innovative way to improve patient care. , 2014, International journal of surgery.

[19]  David K Vawdrey,et al.  Evaluation of medication list completeness, safety, and annotations. , 2011, AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium.

[20]  A. Edwards,et al.  Visual acuity impairment in patients with retinitis pigmentosa at age 45 years or older. , 1999, Ophthalmology.