Characterization of noise sources for two generations of computed radiography systems using powder and crystalline photostimulable phosphors.

The performances of two generations of computed radiography (CR) were tested and compared in terms of resolution and noise characteristics. The main aim was to characterize and quantify the noise sources in the images. The systems tested were (1) Agfa CR 25.0, a flying spot reader with powder phosphor image plates (MD 40.0); and (2) the Agfa DX-S, a line-scanning CR reader with needle crystal phosphor image plates (HD 5.0). For both systems, the standard metrics of presampled modulation transfer function (MTF), normalized noise power spectra (NNPS) and detective quantum efficiency (DQE) were measured using standard radiation quality RQA5 as defined by the International Electrotechnical Commission. The various noise sources contributing to the NNPS were separated by using knowledge of their relationship with air kerma, MTF, absorption efficiency and antialiasing filters. The DX-S MTF was superior compared with the CR 25.0. The maximum difference in MTF between the DX-S scan and CR 25.0 subscan directions was 0.13 at 1.3 mm(-1). For a nominal detector air kerma of 4 microGy, the peak DQE of the DX-S was 43 (+/-3)%, which was over double that of the CR 25.0 of 18 (+/-2)%. The additive electronic noise was negligible on the CR 25.0 but calculated to be constant 3.4 x 10(-7) (+/-0.4 x 10(-7)) mm2 at 3.9 microGy on the DX-S. The DX-S has improved image quality compared with a traditional flying spot reader. The separation of the noise sources indicates that the improvements in DQE of the DX-S are due not only to the higher quantum, efficiency and MTF, but also the lower structure, secondary quantum, and excess noise.

[1]  Clemens Herrmann,et al.  Reflective and transmissive CR ScanHead technology on needle image plates , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[2]  Alistair Mackenzie,et al.  Computed Radiography (CR) Systems for Mammography A Comparative Technical Report Edition 2 , 2006 .

[3]  B. R. Whiting,et al.  Storage Phosphor System For Computed Radiography: Optical Effects And Detective Quantum Efficiency (DQE). , 1987, Medical Imaging.

[4]  F R Verdun,et al.  Performance comparison of an active matrix flat panel imager, computed radiography system, and a screen-film system at four standard radiation qualities. , 2005, Medical physics.

[5]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  An experimental comparison of detector performance for computed radiography systems. , 2002, Medical physics.

[6]  M. Giger,et al.  Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 2. Noise Wiener spectrum. , 1984, Medical physics.

[7]  B. Schueler,et al.  Performance evaluation of a computed radiography imaging device using a typical "front side" and novel "dual side" readout storage phosphors. , 2006, Medical physics.

[8]  Tomonori Gido,et al.  Improved computed radiography image quality from a BaFl:Eu photostimulable phosphor plate. , 2002, Medical physics.

[9]  J A Rowlands,et al.  Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: theoretical analysis of detective quantum efficiency. , 1997, Medical physics.

[10]  A R Cowen,et al.  Physical imaging performance of a compact computed radiography acquisition device. , 1998, Medical physics.

[11]  Khan M Siddiqui,et al.  Multi-institutional analysis of computed and direct radiography: part I. Technologist productivity. , 2005, Radiology.

[12]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Comparison of edge analysis techniques for the determination of the MTF of digital radiographic systems. , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Paul Leblans,et al.  New needle-crystalline CR detector , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[14]  Arnold R. Cowen,et al.  Signal, noise and SNR transfer properties of computed radiography , 1993 .

[15]  R. K. Swank.  Absorption and noise in x‐ray phosphors , 1973 .

[16]  M. Körner,et al.  Initial clinical results with a new needle screen storage phosphor system in chest radiograms. , 2005, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[17]  H. Blume,et al.  DQE(f) of four generations of computed radiography acquisition devices. , 1995, Medical physics.

[18]  G. Lubberts,et al.  Random Noise Produced by X-Ray Fluorescent Screens* , 1968 .

[19]  E. Samei,et al.  A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device. , 1998, Medical physics.

[20]  I A Cunningham,et al.  Signal and noise transfer properties of photoelectric interactions in diagnostic x-ray imaging detectors. , 2006, Medical physics.

[21]  R. Aufrichtig,et al.  Comparison of low contrast detectability between a digital amorphous silicon and a screen-film based imaging system for thoracic radiography. , 1999, Medical physics.

[22]  Katherine P. Andriole,et al.  Productivity and Cost Assessment of Computed Radiography, Digital Radiography, and Screen-Film for Outpatient Chest Examinations , 2002, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[23]  Ralph Schaetzing,et al.  New high-speed scanning technique for computed radiography , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[24]  J. Rowlands,et al.  The physics of computed radiography. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  A Workman,et al.  A comparison of the imaging properties of CCD-based devices used for small field digital mammography. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  J M Boone,et al.  Comparison of x-ray cross sections for diagnostic and therapeutic medical physics. , 1996, Medical physics.

[27]  Ann-Katherine Carton,et al.  Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control. , 2005, Medical physics.

[28]  W. Hillen,et al.  Imaging performance of a digital storage phosphor system. , 1987, Medical physics.

[29]  Ying Chen,et al.  Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. I. Modulation transfer function. , 2006, Medical physics.

[30]  Hisatoyo Kato,et al.  Quantitative analysis of imaging performance for computed radiography systems , 1995, Medical Imaging.

[31]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems. , 2003, Medical physics.