eCook: What behavioural challenges await this potentially transformative concept?

Abstract This paper aims to identify and understand the challenges that may confront the scaling up of a proposed battery electric cooking concept (Batchelor 2013), eCook, which offers the potential for emission free cooking, with time/money savings and broader environmental benefits from reduced fuelwood/charcoal consumption. By drawing on the literature on the transition to electric cooking in South Africa and more broadly, literature from across the Global South analysing the uptake of ICS (improved cookstoves), LPG (liquid petroleum gas) and solar home systems, this study identifies the factors (e.g. successful delivery models and marketing strategies) that have enabled these innovations to reach scale. This knowledge is then related to the eCook concept, by identifying the potential users of this promising technology and outlining potential marketing strategies, as well as a user-focused iterative design process, that will enable social enterprises to reach them. Uptake is predicted to be most rapid in hot climates where fuelwood/charcoal is purchased and low energy diets and low power cooking devices are the standard. Mobile enabled fee-for-service (utility) business models, the establishment of a service network, awareness raising campaigns on the benefits of clean cooking, female-focussed training programmes and bundling eCook systems with locally appropriate appliances to enable productive activities are seen as key to reaching scale.

[1]  M. Asaduzzaman,et al.  The Benefits of Solar Home Systems:An Analysis from Bangladesh , 2013 .

[2]  J. Martínez-Gómez,et al.  Analysis of LPG, electric and induction cookers during cooking typical Ecuadorian dishes into the national efficient cooking program , 2016 .

[3]  Taryn Dinkelman.  The Effects of Rural Electrification on Employment: New Evidence from South Africa , 2011 .

[4]  Eva A Rehfuess,et al.  Clean fuels for resource-poor settings: A systematic review of barriers and enablers to adoption and sustained use. , 2016, Environmental research.

[5]  Johannes Urpelainen,et al.  Solar home systems for rural India: Survey evidence on awareness and willingness to pay from Uttar Pradesh ☆ , 2015 .

[6]  Radhika Menon,et al.  A rapid assessment randomised-controlled trial of improved cookstoves in rural Ghana , 2012 .

[7]  Anton Eberhard,et al.  South Africa's rapid electrification programme: Policy, institutional, planning, financing and technical innovations , 2008 .

[8]  A. Zahnd,et al.  Enhancing capacity for solar photovoltaics in rural Nepal , 2012 .

[9]  Electricity from solar home systems in South Africa , 2007 .

[10]  Omar Masera,et al.  Patterns of Stove Use in the Context of Fuel–Device Stacking: Rationale and Implications , 2015, EcoHealth.

[11]  A. Jacobson.  Connective Power: Solar Electrification and Social Change in Kenya , 2004 .

[12]  Omar Masera,et al.  Arresting the Killer in the Kitchen: The Promises and Pitfalls of Commercializing Improved Cookstoves , 2009 .

[13]  Daniel Krewski,et al.  Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: health implications of short-lived greenhouse pollutants , 2009, The Lancet.

[14]  Govinda R. Timilsina,et al.  Household Cooking Fuel Choice and Adoption of Improved Cookstoves in Developing Countries: A Review , 2014 .

[15]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  Who Adopts Improved Fuels and Cookstoves? A Systematic Review , 2012, Environmental health perspectives.

[16]  Alam Hossain Mondal,et al.  Impacts of solar home systems on social development in rural Bangladesh , 2011 .

[17]  B. Sovacool,et al.  A comparative analysis of solar home system programmes in China, Laos, Mongolia and Papua New Guinea , 2012 .

[18]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Cooking fuel choice in rural China: results from microdata , 2017 .

[19]  B. Behera,et al.  Patterns and determinants of household use of fuels for cooking: Empirical evidence from sub-Saharan Africa , 2016 .

[20]  G. Köhlin,et al.  The Dynamics of Electric Cookstove Adoption: Panel data evidence from Ethiopia , 2013 .

[21]  Elisa Puzzolo,et al.  Factors influencing the large-scale uptake by households of cleaner and more efficient household energy technologies , 2013 .

[22]  Benjamin K. Sovacool,et al.  The socio-technical barriers to Solar Home Systems (SHS) in Papua New Guinea: "Choosing pigs, prostitutes, and poker chips over panels" , 2011 .

[23]  Chandra Venkataraman,et al.  The Indian National Initiative for Advanced Biomass Cookstoves: The benefits of clean combustion , 2010 .

[24]  Mark Howells,et al.  Beyond free electricity: The costs of electric cooking in poor households and a market-friendly alternative , 2006 .

[25]  E. Finkelstein,et al.  The Use of Behaviour Change Techniques in Clean Cooking Interventions to Achieve Health, Economic and Environmental Impact: a review of the evidence and scorecard of effectiveness , 2014 .

[26]  Gordon Bauer,et al.  Evaluation of usage and fuel savings of solar ovens in Nicaragua , 2016 .

[27]  P. Keller,et al.  Insulated Solar Electric Cooking – Tomorrow's healthy affordable stoves? , 2017 .

[28]  Pedro Neves,et al.  Assessment of locally manufactured small wind turbines as an appropriate technology for the electrification of the Caribbean Coast of Nicaragua , 2015 .

[29]  Ivan Nygaard,et al.  Review of Solar PV Market Development in East Africa , 2014 .

[30]  N. Scott,et al.  Solar electric cooking in Africa: Where will the transition happen first? , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[31]  Bagen,et al.  Evaluating the impact of wind generators in Inner Mongolia: Project summary report , 1999 .

[32]  H. Annegarn,et al.  Domestic LPG interventions in South Africa: Challenges and lessons , 2016 .

[33]  S. Nautiyal.  A transition from wood fuel to LPG and its impact on energy conservation and health in the Central Himalayas, India , 2013, Journal of Mountain Science.

[34]  R. Heltberg,et al.  Fuel switching: evidence from eight developing countries , 2004 .

[35]  A. Mobarak,et al.  Gender Differences in Preferences, Intra-Household Externalities, and Low Demand for Improved Cookstoves , 2013 .

[36]  Elisa Puzzolo,et al.  Enablers and Barriers to Large-Scale Uptake of Improved Solid Fuel Stoves: A Systematic Review , 2013, Environmental health perspectives.

[37]  Martina Schäfer,et al.  The implementation of Solar Home Systems as a poverty reduction strategy—A case study in Sri Lanka , 2011 .

[38]  Srilata Kammila,et al.  The State of the Global Clean and Improved Cooking Sector , 2015 .

[39]  Nebojsa Nakicenovic,et al.  Measuring energy access: Supporting a global target , 2010 .

[40]  Jon Sumanik-Leary,et al.  Small Wind Turbines for Decentralised Rural Electrification: Case Studies in Peru, Nicaragua and Scotland , 2013 .

[41]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  Benefits and Costs of Improved Cookstoves: Assessing the Implications of Variability in Health, Forest and Climate Impacts , 2012, PloS one.

[42]  Mattias Nordström,et al.  Rural people pay for solar: experiences from the Zambia PV-ESCO project , 2004 .

[43]  S. Kaneko,et al.  Are micro-benefits negligible? The implications of the rapid expansion of Solar Home Systems (SHS) in rural Bangladesh for sustainable development , 2011 .

[44]  Jon Sumanik-Leary,et al.  A review of the behavioural change challenges facing a proposed solar and battery electric cooking concept , 2015 .

[45]  Xavier Lemaire,et al.  Off-grid electrification with solar home systems: The experience of a fee-for-service concession in South Africa , 2011 .

[46]  C. Wagner,et al.  Understanding domestic fuel use practices in an urban township , 2018 .