The spatial and temporal dynamics of infrastructure development disparity – From assessment to analyses

Infrastructure development relies on the allocation of resources which is usually uneven across cities. Socioeconomic instability stems from such development disparity that consequently affects the decision processes focusing on sustainable development. This study proposes an approach to examine the temporal dynamics of infrastructure development disparity at multiple spatial scales. Starting from the selection of spatial scales, time-series and infrastructure development indicators fitting the study requirements, the Infrastructure Development Index (IDI) values are computed through sequential steps involving data normalization and assessment of indicator weights through analytic hierarchy process. The sectoral, IDI and disparity analyses are then carried out using coefficient of variance (Cv), temporal IDI value change, and Cv/sample t-test methods, respectively. The methodology was applied to a case study area, the five city districts (Faisalabad, Gujranwala, Lahore, Multan and Rawalpindi) of the province of Punjab, Pakistan, at town, city district and province scales (the province scale encompassed only the five city districts). Three time periods (2002, 2007 and 2012) and five infrastructure development indicators were considered. The results show that the development status in Lahore (provincial capital) was better compared to the other city districts. The temporal trend, however, indicated that the provision of infrastructure facilities has improved in the study area over the past years. The proposed methods performed quite well at identifying the development gaps at multiple spatial scales, though the approach can be enhanced by incorporating more indicators.

[1]  Evangelos Triantaphyllou,et al.  Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study , 2000 .

[2]  F. Burke,et al.  Socio-Economic Disparities in Balochistan, Pakistan – A Multivariate Analysis , 2015 .

[3]  Tung-Kai Shyy,et al.  What is the Strength of the Link Between Objective and Subjective Indicators of Urban Quality of Life? , 2006 .

[4]  Brian Goodall The Penguin dictionary of human geography , 2017 .

[5]  Douglas Holtz-Eakin,et al.  Infrastructure in a Structural Model of Economic Growth , 1994 .

[6]  H. Dadashpoor,et al.  Is inequality in the distribution of urban facilities inequitable? Exploring a method for identifying spatial inequity in an Iranian city , 2016 .

[7]  Shabana Khan,et al.  Vulnerability assessments and their planning implications: a case study of the Hutt Valley, New Zealand , 2012, Natural Hazards.

[8]  George A. Morgan,et al.  The Development of A County Level Index Of Well-Being , 2005 .

[9]  D. Rondinelli,et al.  Secondary Cities in Developing Countries: Policies for Diffusing Urbanization. , 1983 .

[10]  David R. Williams,et al.  Space, race, and poverty: Spatial inequalities in walkable neighborhood amenities? , 2012, Demographic research.

[11]  Stella Lowder The context of urban planning in secondary cities , 1991 .

[12]  H. Esfahani,et al.  Institutions, Infrastructure, and Economic Growth , 1999 .

[13]  S. Habibi,et al.  Causes, Results and Methods of Controlling Urban Sprawl , 2011 .

[14]  Chang Gyu Choi,et al.  Metropolitan growth and community disparities: Insights from the state of New Jersey in the US , 2013 .

[15]  M. Nagai,et al.  Spatial Interrelationships of Quality of Life with Land Use/Land Cover, Demography and Urbanization , 2016, Social Indicators Research.

[16]  Selim Jahan,et al.  Human development report 2015: work for human development , 2015 .

[17]  Muhammad Nadeem Zafar,et al.  Assessing Pollution Levels in Effluents of Industries in City Zone of Faisalabad, Pakistan , 2005 .

[18]  Amartya Sen,et al.  Human development Index: Methodology and Measurement , 1994 .

[19]  Jochen A. G. Jaeger,et al.  Suitability criteria for measures of urban sprawl , 2010 .

[20]  Shlomo Yitzhaki,et al.  On an Extension of the Gini Inequality Index , 1983 .

[21]  S. Saxena,et al.  The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. , 1998, Social science & medicine.

[22]  E. Ahmad,et al.  Poverty, Inequality and Growth in Pakistan , 1989 .

[23]  Nitin K. Tripathi,et al.  A multi-scale modeling approach for simulating urbanization in a metropolitan region , 2015 .

[24]  B. Everitt The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics , 1998 .

[25]  N. Ahmad,et al.  Legal and institutional perplexities hampering the implementation of urban development plans in Pakistan , 2012 .

[26]  X. Delclòs,et al.  The uneven distribution of evictions as new evidence of urban inequality: A spatial analysis approach in two Catalan cities , 2016 .

[27]  Hafiz A. Pasha,et al.  Social development ranking of districts of Pakistan , 1996 .

[28]  M. D. Morris,et al.  Measuring the Condition of the World's Poor: The Physical Quality of Life Index , 1979 .

[29]  A. Njoh Urbanization and development in sub-Saharan Africa , 2003 .

[30]  Hongping Yuan,et al.  Critical indicators for assessing the contribution of infrastructure projects to coordinated urban–rural development in China , 2012 .

[31]  Giancarlo Mangone,et al.  Constructing hybrid infrastructure: Exploring the potential ecological, social, and economic benefits of integrating municipal infrastructure into constructed environments , 2016 .

[32]  J. Williamson Regional Inequality and the Process of National Development: A Description of the Patterns , 1965, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[33]  Douglas A. Hicks,et al.  The inequality-adjusted human development index: A constructive proposal , 1997 .

[34]  Jianhong Wu,et al.  Data clustering - theory, algorithms, and applications , 2007 .

[35]  B. Roberts,et al.  The systems of secondary cities : the neglected drivers of urbanising economies , 2014 .