Inbreeding depression and mixed mating in Leptosiphon jepsonii: a comparison of three populations.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Inbreeding depression is thought to play a central role in the evolution and maintenance of cross-fertilization. Theory indicates that inbreeding depression can be purged with self-fertilization, resulting in positive feedback for the selection of selfing. Variation among populations of Leptosiphon jepsonii in the timing and rate of self-fertilization provides an opportunity to study the evolution of inbreeding depression and mating systems. In addition, the hypothesis that differences in inbreeding depression for male and female fitness can stabilize mixed mating in L. jepsonii is tested. METHODS In a growth room experiment, inbreeding depression was measured in three populations with mean outcrossing rates ranging from 0.06 to 0.69. The performance of selfed and outcrossed progeny is compared at five life history stages. To distinguish between self-incompatibility and early inbreeding depression, aborted seeds and unfertilized ovules were counted in selfed and outcrossed fruits. In one population, pollen and ovule production was quantified to estimate inbreeding depression for male and female fitness. KEY RESULTS Both prezygotic barriers and inbreeding depression limited self seed set in the most outcrossing population. Cumulative inbreeding depression ranged from 0.297 to 0.501, with the lowest value found in the most selfing population. Significant inbreeding depression for early life stages was found only in the more outcrossing populations. Inbreeding depression was not significant for pollen or ovule production. CONCLUSIONS The results provide modest support for the hypothesized relationship between inbreeding depression and mating systems. The absence of early inbreeding depression in the more selfing populations is consistent with theory on purging. Differences in male and female expression of inbreeding depression do not appear to stabilize mixed mating in L. jepsonii. The current estimates of inbreeding depression for L. jepsonii differ from those of previous studies, underscoring the effects of environmental variation on its expression.

[1]  M. Uyenoyama,et al.  ON THE EVOLUTIONARY COSTS OF SELF‐INCOMPATIBILITY: INCOMPLETE REPRODUCTIVE COMPENSATION DUE TO POLLEN LIMITATION , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[2]  D. Levin The Evolutionary Significance of Pseudo-Self-Fertility , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[3]  C. Goodwillie,et al.  Transient Self‐Incompatibility Confers Delayed Selfing in Leptosiphon jepsonii (Polemoniaceae) , 2004, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[4]  M. Rausher,et al.  THE ROLE OF INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN MAINTAINING THE MIXED MATING SYSTEM OF THE COMMON MORNING GLORY, IPOMOEA PURPUREA , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[5]  C. Goodwillie The genetic control of self-incompatibility in Linanthus parviflorus (Polemoniaceae) , 1997, Heredity.

[6]  R. Lande,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF SELF‐FERTILIZATION AND INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN PLANTS. I. GENETIC MODELS , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[7]  K. Bawa,et al.  Late-acting self-incompatibility in angiosperms , 1986, The Botanical Review.

[8]  D. Carr,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MATING‐SYSTEM CHARACTERS AND INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN MIMULUS GUTTATUS , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[9]  M. R. Dudash RELATIVE FITNESS OF SELFED AND OUTCROSSED PROGENY IN A SELF‐COMPATIBLE, PROTANDROUS SPECIES, SABATIA ANGULARIS L. (GENTIANACEAE): A COMPARISON IN THREE ENVIRONMENTS , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[10]  A. Stephenson,et al.  Interrelationships Among Inbreeding Depression, Plasticity in the Self-incompatibility System, and the Breeding System of Campanula rapunculoides L. (Campanulaceae) , 2000 .

[11]  Jarmila Solárová,et al.  Incompatibility in Angiosperms , 1978, Biologia Plantarum.

[12]  K. Holsinger INBREEDING DEPRESSION DOESN'T MATTER: THE GENETIC BASIS OF MATING‐SYSTEM EVOLUTION , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[13]  K. Holsinger Mass-Action Models of Plant Mating Systems: The Evolutionary Stability of Mixed Mating Systems , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[14]  W. Wilson,et al.  SELF‐FERTILIZATION AND THE ESCAPE FROM POLLEN LIMITATION IN VARIABLE POLLINATION ENVIRONMENTS , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[15]  N. Ellstrand,et al.  INBREEDING EFFECTS IN CLARKIA TEMBLORIENSIS (ONAGRACEAE) POPULATIONS WITH DIFFERENT NATURAL OUTCROSSING RATES , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[16]  C. Goodwillie,et al.  Correlated Evolution in Floral Morphology and the Timing of Self‐Compatibility in Leptosiphon jepsonii (Polemoniaceae) , 2005, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[17]  Thompson,et al.  Variation in self‐fertility, inbreeding depression and levels of inbreeding in four Cyclamen species , 1999 .

[18]  V. Grant,et al.  Flower pollination in the phlox family , 1965 .

[19]  C. Goodwillie MULTIPLE ORIGINS OF SELF‐COMPATIBILITY IN LINANTHUS SECTION LEPTOSIPHON (POLEMONIACEAE): PHYLOGENETIC EVIDENCE FROM INTERNAL‐TRANSCRIBED‐SPACER SEQUENCE DATA , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[20]  A. Stephenson,et al.  Environmental variation influences the magnitude of inbreeding depression in Cucurbita pepo ssp. texana (Cucurbitaceae) , 2005, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[21]  T. Kao,et al.  Effects of Style Age on the Performance of Self and Cross Pollen in Campanula rapunculoides , 1992 .

[22]  C. Goodwillie Inbreeding depression and mating systems in two species of Linanthus (Polemoniaceae) , 2000, Heredity.

[23]  M. Johnston,et al.  CORRELATED EVOLUTION OF SELF‐FERTILIZATION AND INBREEDING DEPRESSION: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF NINE POPULATIONS OF AMSINCKIA (BORAGINACEAE) , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[24]  D. Waller,et al.  Do Plant Populations Purge Their Genetic Load? Effects of Population Size and Mating History on Inbreeding Depression , 1999 .

[25]  S. Kalisz,et al.  The Evolutionary Enigma of Mixed Mating Systems in Plants: Occurrence, Theoretical Explanations, and Empirical Evidence , 2005 .

[26]  M. Johnston Evolution of intermediate selfing rates in plants: pollination ecology versus deleterious mutations , 1998, Genetica.

[27]  M. Johnston,et al.  ON THE MEASUREMENT OF INBREEDING DEPRESSION , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[28]  J. Busch,et al.  Inbreeding depression in self-incompatible and self-compatible populations of Leavenworthia alabamica , 2005, Heredity.

[29]  R. F. del Castillo FITNESS CONSEQUENCES OF MATERNAL AND NONMATERNAL COMPONENTS OF INBREEDING IN THE GYNODIOECIOUS PHACELIA DUBIA. , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[30]  K. Mustajärvi,et al.  Inbreeding depression in perennial Lychnis viscaria (Caryophyllaceae): effects of population mating history and nutrient availability. , 2005, American journal of botany.

[31]  L. F. Delph,et al.  AN ASSOCIATION BETWEEN A FLORAL TRAIT AND INBREEDING DEPRESSION , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[32]  Michele R. Dudash,et al.  Inbreeding depression in two species of Mimulus (Scrophulariaceae) with contrasting mating systems , 1996 .

[33]  C. Andrus Plant breeding systems , 1963, Euphytica.

[34]  D. Levin INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN PARTIALLY SELF‐FERTILIZING PHLOX , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[35]  A. Stephenson,et al.  The Potential for Mixed Mating in a Self‐Incompatible Plant , 2001, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[36]  Vogler,et al.  Inbreeding depression in Campanula rapunculoides L. I. A comparison of inbreeding depression in plants derived from strong and weak self‐incompatibility phenotypes , 1999 .

[37]  B. Husband,et al.  EVOLUTION OF THE MAGNITUDE AND TIMING OF INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN PLANTS , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[38]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  The evolutionary genetics of sexual systems in flowering plants , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[39]  S. Kalisz,et al.  A method to estimate pollen viability from pollen size variation. , 2002, American journal of botany.

[40]  Rory A. Fisher,et al.  AVERAGE EXCESS AND AVERAGE EFFECT OF A GENE SUBSTITUTION , 1941 .

[41]  S. Kalisz,et al.  BENEFITS OF AUTONOMOUS SELFING UNDER UNPREDICTABLE POLLINATOR ENVIRONMENTS , 2003 .

[42]  M. Rausher,et al.  Stabilization of Mixed‐Mating Systems by Differences in the Magnitude of Inbreeding Depression for Male and Female Fitness Components , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[43]  D. G. Lloyd,et al.  Self- and Cross-Fertilization in Plants. II. The Selection of Self- Fertilization , 1992, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[44]  P. Cheptou,et al.  The effect of drought stress on inbreeding depression in four populations of the Mediterranean outcrossing plant Crepis sancta (Asteraceae) , 2000, Heredity.

[45]  D. Carr,et al.  Inbreeding depression under a competitive regime in Mimulus guttatus: consequences for potential male and female function , 1995, Heredity.

[46]  L. F. Delph,et al.  INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN GYNODIOECIOUS LOBELIA SIPHILITICA: AMONG‐FAMILY DIFFERENCES OVERRIDE BETWEEN‐MORPH DIFFERENCES , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[47]  M. Feldman,et al.  The Evolution of Self-Fertilization in Plants: A Population Genetic Model , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[48]  D. de Nettancourt,et al.  Incompatibility in angiosperms , 1977, Sexual Plant Reproduction.

[49]  D. G. Lloyd,et al.  Some Reproductive Factors Affecting the Selection of Self-Fertilization in Plants , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[50]  M. Uyenoyama,et al.  Coevolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression. I. Mutation-selection balance at one and two loci. , 1991, Theoretical population biology.

[51]  Deborah Charlesworth,et al.  INBREEDING DEPRESSION AND ITS EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES , 1987 .

[52]  L. Fishman Inbreeding depression in two populations of Arenaria uniflora (Caryophyllaceae) with contrasting mating systems , 2001, Heredity.