Developing relative abundance techniques (RATs) for monitoring rodent populations

Accurate density estimates of rodents are frequently difficult or cost-prohibitive to determine. Thus, a number of techniques (track plates, monitoring blocks, chew cards/sticks, apple slice index, trapping) are often used to index rodent populations. Theoretically, the sensitivity of these indexing techniques could be improved if they applied continuous measurements rather than simple binary measurements (presence/absence). Development of a relative abundance technique that is simple to apply and sensitive to changes in population density is critical for the operational management of rodent pests. In addition to providing a quantitative measure of abundance with statistical parameters, an indexing technique that does not require handling of animals is important in consideration of potential disease issues (for example, hantavirus, arenavirus, etc.). We investigated track plates, chew cards and monitoring blocks and associated continuous measurement methods for calculating indices of rodent abundance. In laboratory and field settings, we tested their effectiveness in detecting different population densities of California meadow voles (Microtus californicus). Chew cards were poorly accepted by meadow voles in pen and field tests. However, track plates and monitoring blocks may provide useful tools for indexing meadow vole populations, and have application for other rodent species.

[1]  T. Cutler Using remote photography in wildlife ecology : a review , 1999 .

[2]  J. Caughley,et al.  Managing Mouse Plagues In Rural Australia , 1998 .

[3]  R. Engeman,et al.  IPM strategies: Indexing difficult to monitor populations of pest species , 2000 .

[4]  R. Engeman,et al.  VARIANCE ESTIMATE FOR THE ALLEN ACTIVITY INDEX , 1998 .

[5]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Wild Mammals of North America. , 1983 .

[6]  D. Whisson,et al.  A visual method for indexing muskrat populations , 2003 .

[7]  R. Taylor,et al.  Rats eradicated from rugged breaksea island (170 HA), Fiordland, New Zealand , 1993 .

[8]  S. Redpath,et al.  Evaluation of methods to estimate field vole Microtus agrestis abundance in upland habitats , 1995 .

[9]  Robert M. Timm,et al.  Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage , 1985 .

[10]  R. Engeman,et al.  COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR DETECTING VOLES UNDER APPLE TREES , 1991 .

[11]  G. Caughley,et al.  Analysis of vertebrate populations , 1977 .

[12]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Variance Components , 2003 .

[13]  C. Krebs,et al.  Pitfall Trapping of Microtus townsendii , 1978 .

[14]  R. Mclean,et al.  A Unified Approach to Mixed Linear Models , 1991 .

[15]  Norris L. Dodd,et al.  Use of Track Stations to Index Abundance of Sciurids , 1998 .

[16]  R. Engeman,et al.  Evaluation of Three Relative Abundance Indices for Assessing Dingo Populations , 1996 .

[17]  C. Krebs,et al.  Pitfall versus Live-Trap Enumeration of Fluctuating Populations of Microtus townsendii , 1980 .

[18]  Graeme Caughley,et al.  Analysis of vertebrate populations , 1977 .