Co-designing Possible Flooding Solutions: Participatory Mapping Methods to Identify Flood Management Options from a UK Borders Case Study

his paper reports on the findings developed by a funded project within the UK Rural Economy and Land Use Programme: ‘Managing borderlands: adaptive decision making amongst specialists and non-specialists’. The project focuses specifically on the development of a nested-scale participatory GIS (PGIS) method to identify spatially local perceptions and experiential knowledge of the risk and vulnerability of two catchments in the Scottish–English Borders. The method attempts to move beyond mapping risk towards the co-design of possible solutions. This will highlight the potential for improved inclusion of local perspectives on risk afforded by using PGIS mapping approaches in the UK context. The potential of the approach to generate co-designed community preferences leading to more resilient solutions (particularly in terms of social and economic consequences) to environmental change will also be discussed.

[1]  S. White Depoliticising development: The uses and abuses of participation , 1996 .

[2]  Matthias Stevens,et al.  NoiseTube User Guide , 2009 .

[3]  Kristen Purcell,et al.  Public Participation and the Environment: Do We Know What Works? , 1999 .

[4]  John Pickles Ground Truth 1995-2005 , 2006, Trans. GIS.

[5]  Peter A. Kwaku Kyem,et al.  Web‐Based GIS and the Future of Participatory GIS Applications within Local and Indigenous Communities , 2009, Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries..

[6]  Steve Cinderby,et al.  How to reach the ‘hard-to-reach’: the development of Participatory Geographic Information Systems (P-GIS) for inclusive urban design in UK cities , 2010 .

[7]  M. Morris Understanding Risk - Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1997 .

[8]  Vikas Sindhwani,et al.  Data Quality from Crowdsourcing: A Study of Annotation Selection Criteria , 2009, HLT-NAACL 2009.

[9]  Michael F. Goodchild Chapter 2 Virtual Geographic Environments as Collective Constructions , 2012 .

[10]  Sherilyn MacGregor,et al.  Big society, little justice? Community renewable energy and the politics of localism , 2014 .

[11]  M. Pavlovskaya Theorizing with GIS: A Tool for Critical Geographies? , 2006 .

[12]  Marianna Pavlovskaya,et al.  NON-QUANTITATIVE GIS , 2009 .

[13]  Peter Mooney,et al.  Can Volunteered Geographic Information Be a Participant in eEnvironment and SDI? , 2011, ISESS.

[14]  H. Fineberg,et al.  Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1996 .

[15]  S. Elwood,et al.  Qualitative GIS: A Mixed Methods Approach , 2009 .

[16]  J. Silvertown A new dawn for citizen science. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  Andrea Cornwall,et al.  Locating Citizen Participation , 2002 .

[18]  John Forrester,et al.  Participatory GIS and its application in governance: the example of air quality and the implications for noise pollution , 2008 .

[19]  I. Turton,et al.  Web-based public participation geographical information systems: an aid to local environmental decision-making , 2000 .

[20]  G. Davies,et al.  Qualitative methods II: minding the gap , 2008 .

[21]  Chao Li,et al.  A comparison of spatial knowledge acquisition with maps and mobile maps , 2009, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[22]  Trisha Gura,et al.  Citizen science: Amateur experts , 2013, Nature.

[23]  Daren C. Brabham Crowdsourcing the Public Participation Process for Planning Projects , 2009 .