Two-step sensitivity testing of parametrized and regionalized life cycle assessments: methodology and case study.

Comprehensive sensitivity analysis is a significant tool to interpret and improve life cycle assessment (LCA) models, but is rarely performed. Sensitivity analysis will increase in importance as inventory databases become regionalized, increasing the number of system parameters, and parametrized, adding complexity through variables and nonlinear formulas. We propose and implement a new two-step approach to sensitivity analysis. First, we identify parameters with high global sensitivities for further examination and analysis with a screening step, the method of elementary effects. Second, the more computationally intensive contribution to variance test is used to quantify the relative importance of these parameters. The two-step sensitivity test is illustrated on a regionalized, nonlinear case study of the biodiversity impacts from land use of cocoa production, including a worldwide cocoa products trade model. Our simplified trade model can be used for transformable commodities where one is assessing market shares that vary over time. In the case study, the highly uncertain characterization factors for the Ivory Coast and Ghana contributed more than 50% of variance for almost all countries and years examined. The two-step sensitivity test allows for the interpretation, understanding, and improvement of large, complex, and nonlinear LCA systems.

[1]  Andrea Saltelli,et al.  An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[2]  C. Bauer,et al.  Key Elements in a Framework for Land Use Impact Assessment Within LCA (11 pp) , 2007 .

[3]  Max D. Morris,et al.  Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments , 1991 .

[4]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer , 2008 .

[5]  Jeroen B. Guinée,et al.  Uncertainties in a carbon footprint model for detergents; quantifying the confidence in a comparative result , 2009 .

[6]  Joyce Smith Cooper,et al.  Parameterization in Life Cycle Assessment inventory data: review of current use and the representation of uncertainty , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[7]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): Case Study on Plant-Protection Products and Implications for Decision Making (9 pp + 3 pp) , 2005 .

[8]  S. B. Lyerly.  The average spearman rank correlation coefficient , 1952 .

[9]  Shinsuke Sakai,et al.  Formulation of sensitivity analysis in life cycle assessment using a perturbation method , 2002 .

[10]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  GIS-based regionalized life cycle assessment: how big is small enough? Methodology and case study of electricity generation. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  David W. Scott,et al.  Multivariate Density Estimation: Theory, Practice, and Visualization , 1992, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[12]  Paola Annoni,et al.  Sixth International Conference on Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output How to avoid a perfunctory sensitivity analysis , 2010 .

[13]  M. Kendall.  A NEW MEASURE OF RANK CORRELATION , 1938 .

[14]  Joaquim F. Pinto da Costa,et al.  LIMIT DISTRIBUTION FOR THE WEIGHTED RANK CORRELATION COEFFICIENT, rW , 2006 .

[15]  R. Kleijn,et al.  Numerical approaches towards life cycle interpretation five examples , 2001 .

[16]  T. Koellner,et al.  Land use impacts on biodiversity in LCA: a global approach , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[17]  Edward E. Cureton.  The average spearman rank criterion correlation when ties are present , 1958 .

[18]  S. Pfister,et al.  Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Identification of key issues for further investigation in improving the reliability of life-cycle assessments , 1996 .

[20]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Framework for modelling data uncertainty in life cycle inventories , 2001 .

[21]  R. Heijungs.  Sensitivity coefficients for matrix-based LCA , 2010 .

[22]  Anna Björklund,et al.  Survey of approaches to improve reliability in lca , 2002 .

[23]  Anthony G. Williams,et al.  Approaches for Addressing Life Cycle Assessment Data Gaps for Bio‐based Products , 2011 .

[24]  Paul F. Donald,et al.  Biodiversity Impacts of Some Agricultural Commodity Production Systems , 2004 .

[25]  Rob Alkemade,et al.  GLOBIO3: A Framework to Investigate Options for Reducing Global Terrestrial Biodiversity Loss , 2009, Ecosystems.

[26]  T. Nemecek,et al.  Overview and methodology: Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3 , 2013 .