Platelet Reactivity and Cardiovascular Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Time-Dependent Analysis of the Gauging Responsiveness With a VerifyNow P2Y12 Assay Impact on Thrombosis and Safety (GRAVITAS) Trial

Background— In the Gauging Responsiveness With A VerifyNow P2Y12 Assay: Impact on Thrombosis and Safety (GRAVITAS) trial, 6 months of high-dose clopidogrel did not reduce cardiovascular events compared with standard-dose clopidogrel in patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (OTR) after percutaneous coronary intervention, defined as OTR ≥230 P2Y12 reaction units according to the VerifyNow P2Y12 platelet function test. The aim of this analysis was to examine the relationship between outcomes and OTR over the course of the trial. Methods and Results— OTR was measured at 12 to 24 hours and 30±7 days after percutaneous coronary intervention. Cox proportional hazards models with OTR as a time-varying covariate were used to determine the association between OTR and the primary end point of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis. Of the 2800 enrolled patients, 2796 (99.98%) had evaluable platelet function data. OTR <208 P2Y12 reaction units was significantly associated with a lower risk of the primary end point at 60 days (hazard ratio, 0.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.04 to 0.79; P=0.02) and at 6 months (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.23 to 0.82; P=0.01). After adjustment for other significant predictors of outcome, OTR <208 P2Y12 reaction units remained independently associated with the primary end point at 60 days (hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.05 to 0.98; P=0.047) and tended to be associated at 6 months (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.28 to 1.04; P=0.065). Conclusions— In the GRAVITAS trial, achievement of on-clopidogrel reactivity <208 P2Y12 reaction units at 12 to 24 hours after percutaneous coronary intervention or during follow-up was associated with a lower risk for cardiovascular events. The efficacy of an individualized strategy to target a level of OTR below this threshold merits investigation. Clinical Trial Registration— http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00645918.

[1]  Letter by Nezami et al regarding article, "Platelet reactivity and cardiovascular outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: a time-dependent analysis of the gauging responsiveness with a VerifyNow P2Y12 assay: impact on thrombosis and safety (GRAVITAS) trial". , 2012, Circulation.

[2]  M. Price,et al.  Impact of platelet reactivity on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention. A collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  J. Marchesini,et al.  Prospective evaluation of on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity over time in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention relationship with gene polymorphisms and clinical outcome. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  N. Schork,et al.  Standard- vs high-dose clopidogrel based on platelet function testing after percutaneous coronary intervention: the GRAVITAS randomized trial. , 2011, JAMA.

[5]  R. Ferrari,et al.  Long-term clinical outcome based on aspirin and clopidogrel responsiveness status after elective percutaneous coronary intervention: a 3T/2R (tailoring treatment with tirofiban in patients showing resistance to aspirin and/or resistance to clopidogrel) trial substudy. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  P. Teirstein,et al.  Pilot study of the antiplatelet effect of increased clopidogrel maintenance dosing and its relationship to CYP2C19 genotype in patients with high on-treatment reactivity. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[7]  T. Costigan,et al.  Increased platelet inhibition after switching from maintenance clopidogrel to prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes: results of the SWAP (SWitching Anti Platelet) study. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Consensus and future directions on the definition of high on-treatment platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  S. Kaul,et al.  ACCF/AHA Clopidogrel Clinical Alert: Approaches to the FDA “Boxed Warning”: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents and the American Heart Association , 2010, Circulation.

[10]  W. Wijns,et al.  Point-of-care assessment of platelet reactivity after clopidogrel to predict myonecrosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[11]  V. Deneer,et al.  Comparison of platelet function tests in predicting clinical outcome in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation. , 2010, JAMA.

[12]  R. Abbate,et al.  High Residual Platelet Reactivity After Clopidogrel Loading and Long-Term Clinical Outcome After Drug-Eluting Stenting for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Disease , 2009, Circulation.

[13]  M. Price Bedside Evaluation of Thienopyridine Antiplatelet Therapy , 2009, Circulation.

[14]  P. Teirstein,et al.  Evaluation of individualized clopidogrel therapy after drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with high residual platelet reactivity: design and rationale of the GRAVITAS trial. , 2009, American heart journal.

[15]  A. Siegbahn,et al.  Assessment of P2Y(12) inhibition with the point-of-care device VerifyNow P2Y12 in patients treated with prasugrel or clopidogrel coadministered with aspirin. , 2009, American heart journal.

[16]  Betti Giusti,et al.  Cardiovascular Death and Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Receiving Coronary Stenting Are Predicted by Residual Platelet Reactivity to ADP Detected by a Point-of-Care Assay: A 12-Month Follow-Up , 2009, Circulation.

[17]  Françoise Dignat-George,et al.  Tailored clopidogrel loading dose according to platelet reactivity monitoring to prevent acute and subacute stent thrombosis. , 2009, The American journal of cardiology.

[18]  G. Montalescot,et al.  Clopidogrel 150 mg/day to overcome low responsiveness in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the VASP-02 (Vasodilator-Stimulated Phosphoprotein-02) randomized study. , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[19]  G. Patti,et al.  Point-of-care measurement of clopidogrel responsiveness predicts clinical outcome in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention results of the ARMYDA-PRO (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty-Platelet Reactivity Predicts Outcome) study. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  M. Fromm,et al.  Cytochrome P450 2C19 681G>A polymorphism and high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity associated with adverse 1-year clinical outcome of elective percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting or bare-metal stents. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  C. Cannon,et al.  High-dose atorvastatin does not negatively influence clinical outcomes among clopidogrel treated acute coronary syndrome patients--a Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 22 (PROVE IT-TIMI 22) analysis. , 2008, American heart journal.

[22]  P. Barragan,et al.  Adjusted clopidogrel loading doses according to vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation index decrease rate of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with clopidogrel resistance: a multicenter randomized prospective study. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  Matthew J Price,et al.  Prognostic significance of post-clopidogrel platelet reactivity assessed by a point-of-care assay on thrombotic events after drug-eluting stent implantation. , 2008, European heart journal.

[24]  D. Angiolillo,et al.  Functional effects of high clopidogrel maintenance dosing in patients with inadequate platelet inhibition on standard dose treatment. , 2008, The American journal of cardiology.

[25]  C. Macaya,et al.  Functional impact of high clopidogrel maintenance dosing in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary interventions , 2007, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[26]  Li Zhang,et al.  A double-blind, randomized study on platelet aggregation in patients treated with a daily dose of 150 or 75 mg of clopidogrel for 30 days. , 2008, European heart journal.

[27]  E. Antman,et al.  Prasugrel Compared With High Loading– and Maintenance–Dose Clopidogrel in Patients With Planned Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The Prasugrel in Comparison to Clopidogrel for Inhibition of Platelet Activation and Aggregation–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 44 Trial , 2007, Circulation.

[28]  A. Colombo,et al.  Incidence and Predictors of Drug-Eluting Stent Thrombosis During and After Discontinuation of Thienopyridine Treatment , 2007, Circulation.

[29]  D. Angiolillo,et al.  Clopidogrel-statin interaction: myth or reality? , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[30]  A. Gori,et al.  Impact of platelet reactivity after clopidogrel administration on drug-eluting stent thrombosis. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[31]  C. Macaya,et al.  Variability in individual responsiveness to clopidogrel: clinical implications, management, and future perspectives. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[32]  N. Cook Use and Misuse of the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve in Risk Prediction , 2007, Circulation.

[33]  P. Morange,et al.  High post-treatment platelet reactivity is associated with a high incidence of myonecrosis after stenting for non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes , 2007, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[34]  F. Neumann,et al.  Impact of the degree of peri-interventional platelet inhibition after loading with clopidogrel on early clinical outcome of elective coronary stent placement. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[35]  Harald Langer,et al.  Low response to clopidogrel is associated with cardiovascular outcome after coronary stent implantation. , 2006, European heart journal.

[36]  G. Wong,et al.  Onset and offset of platelet inhibition after high-dose clopidogrel loading and standard daily therapy measured by a point-of-care assay in healthy volunteers. , 2006, The American journal of cardiology.

[37]  A. Siegbahn,et al.  Prasugrel achieves greater inhibition of platelet aggregation and a lower rate of non-responders compared with clopidogrel in aspirin-treated patients with stable coronary artery disease. , 2006, European heart journal.

[38]  P. Morange,et al.  High post‐treatment platelet reactivity identified low‐responders to dual antiplatelet therapy at increased risk of recurrent cardiovascular events after stenting for acute coronary syndrome , 2006, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[39]  P. Gurbel,et al.  Platelet reactivity in patients and recurrent events post-stenting: results of the PREPARE POST-STENTING Study. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[40]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Variability in platelet responsiveness to clopidogrel among 544 individuals. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[41]  Kevin P. Bliden,et al.  Clopidogrel for Coronary Stenting Response Variability, Drug Resistance, and the Effect of Pretreatment Platelet Reactivity , 2003, Circulation.