Intraoperative Ultrasound Guidance During Intracavitary Brachytherapy Applicator Placement in Cervical Cancer: The University of Alabama at Birmingham Experience

Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the University of Alabama at Birmingham experience with routine intraoperative ultrasound (IUS)–guided tandem placement for cervical cancer. Methods Between 1999 and 2008, 243 cervical cancer patients underwent IUS-guided tandem placement. One hundred thirty-nine patients received low-dose-rate brachytherapy, and 104 received high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Three hundred fifty-six IUS-guided procedures were performed. Clinical and imaging data were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate complications requiring reinsertion of tandem placement in the context of IUS. Results All 243 cervical cancer patients completed intracavitary brachytherapy. Five (1.4%) of 356 IUS-guided applicator placements resulted in uterine perforation. All of these patients underwent successful tandem insertion on the second attempt, and no significant clinical sequelae occurred. Intraoperative ultrasound enabled direct uterine visualization and facilitated real-time feedback for selection of a suitable tandem length and curvature; no suboptimal placements requiring return to the operating room occurred (excluding perforation). Conclusions In this large series, IUS guidance substantially increased the rate of successful applicator placement and diminished the rate of uterine perforation relative to historical controls. We strongly recommend the use of IUS guidance during operative intrauterine tandem placement for cervical cancer.

[1]  D. Velkley,et al.  Routine clinical estimation of rectal, rectosigmoidal, and bladder doses from intracavitary brachytherapy in the treatment of carcinoma of the cervix. , 1981, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  B. Corn,et al.  Intra- and perioperative complications associated with tandem and colpostat application for cervix cancer. , 1997, Gynecologic oncology.

[3]  D. D'Souza,et al.  Optimization of high-dose-rate cervix brachytherapy applicator placement: the benefits of intraoperative ultrasound guidance. , 2007, Brachytherapy.

[4]  H. Madoc‐Jones,et al.  Ultrasound for Diagnosing and Preventing Malplacement of Intrauterine Tandems , 1986, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  A. Jhingran,et al.  Perioperative and postoperative complications of intracavitary radiation for FIGO stage I-III carcinoma of the cervix. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  Jian Z. Wang,et al.  Brachytherapy management of the retroverted uterus using ultrasound-guided implant applicator placement. , 2005, Brachytherapy.

[7]  Patterns of brachytherapy practice for patients with carcinoma of the cervix (1996-1999): a patterns of care study. , 2004 .

[8]  P. Eifel,et al.  Quantification of intracavitary brachytherapy parameters and correlation with outcome in patients with carcinoma of the cervix. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  T. Schultheiss,et al.  Perioperative morbidity of intracavitary gynecologic brachytherapy. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  A. Markoe,et al.  Optimization of high dose-rate cervix brachytherapy; Part I: Dose distribution. , 1991, International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics.

[11]  Akila N Viswanathan,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging in gynecologic brachytherapy: a survey of the American Brachytherapy Society. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  M. Kohler,et al.  Ultrasound‐guided tandem placement for low‐dose‐rate brachytherapy in advanced cervical cancer minimizes risk of intraoperative uterine perforation , 2011, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[13]  J. Sarkaria,et al.  Perioperative morbidity and mortality of high-dose-rate gynecologic brachytherapy. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  K. Scanlan,et al.  Invasive procedures in the female pelvis: value of transabdominal, endovaginal, and endorectal US guidance. , 2001, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[15]  H. Madoc‐Jones,et al.  Intraoperative Real‐Time Ultrasonography During Intrauterine Tandem Placement , 1986, Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[16]  D. Oksuz,et al.  Tandem application with transvaginal ultrasound guidance. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  D. Létourneau,et al.  Prospective comparison of clinical and computed tomography assessment in detecting uterine perforation with intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix , 2006, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[18]  K. Hatch,et al.  Uterine perforation during intracavitary application. Prognostic significance in carcinoma of the cervix. , 1983, Radiology.

[19]  J. Livsey,et al.  External beam boost for cancer of the cervix uteri when intracavitary therapy cannot be performed. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  T. Kamura,et al.  Uterine perforation at the time of brachytherapy for the carcinoma of the uterine cervix. , 1986, Gynecologic oncology.

[21]  T. Pajak,et al.  Technically accurate intracavitary insertions improve pelvic control and survival among patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix. , 1994, Gynecologic oncology.

[22]  W. Small,et al.  Should Uterine Tandem Applicators Ever Be Placed Without Ultrasound Guidance? No: A Brief Report and Review of the Literature , 2011, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[23]  W. Makin,et al.  CT scanning in intracavitary therapy: unexpected findings in "straightforward" insertions. , 1988, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.