Governing cloud computing services: Reconsideration of IT governance structures

There is an increase in the uptake of cloud computing services (CCS). CCS is adopted in the form of a utility, and it incorporates business risks of the service providers and intermediaries. Thus, the adoption of CCS will change the risk profile of an organization. In this situation, organizations need to develop competencies by reconsidering their IT governance structures to achieve a desired level of IT-business alignment and maintain their risk appetite to source business value from CCS. We use the resource-based theories to suggest that collaborative board oversight of CCS, competencies relating to CCS information and financial management, and a CCS-related continuous audit program can contribute to business process performance improvements and overall firm performance. Using survey data, we find evidence of a positive association between these IT governance considerations and business process performance. We also find evidence of positive association between business process performance improvements and overall firm performance. The results suggest that the suggested considerations on IT governance structures can contribute to CCS-related IT-business alignment and lead to anticipated business value from CCS. This study provides guidance to organizations on competencies required to secure business value from CCS.

[1]  Carol Saunders,et al.  PLS: A Silver Bullet? , 2006 .

[2]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Information Technology Payoff in E-Business Environments: An International Perspective on Value Creation of E-Business in the Financial Services Industry , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. , 1977 .

[4]  Ralf Martin,et al.  Anatomy of a Paradox: Management Practices, Organizational Structure and Energy Efficiency , 2012 .

[5]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory: , 1982 .

[6]  Nabil Ahmed Sultan,et al.  Cloud computing: A democratizing force? , 2013, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[7]  J. Manyika,et al.  Disruptive technologies: Advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy , 2013 .

[8]  Rodney S. Tucker,et al.  Green Cloud Computing: Balancing Energy in Processing, Storage, and Transport , 2011, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[9]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[10]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  CIO Reporting Structure, Strategic Positioning, and Firm Performance , 2011, MIS Q..

[11]  Miklos A. Vasarhelyi,et al.  The acceptance and adoption of continuous auditing by internal auditors: A micro analysis , 2012, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Steve G. Sutton,et al.  The role of strategic enterprise risk management and organizational flexibility in easing new regulatory compliance , 2011, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Angela Lin,et al.  Cloud computing as an innovation: Percepetion, attitude, and adoption , 2012, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[14]  Gerald Trites,et al.  Director responsibility for IT governance , 2004, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Xiaochuan Zheng,et al.  Outsourcing accounting information systems: Evidence from closed-end mutual fund families , 2015, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[16]  G. Tian,et al.  Corporate Governance, External Market Discipline and Firm Productivity , 2009 .

[17]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  Acklesh Prasad,et al.  On governance structures for the cloud computing services and assessing their effectiveness , 2014, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Fact or Fiction? A Sensemaking Perspective on the Reality Behind Executives' Perceptions of IT Business Value , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[21]  Colin B. Ferguson,et al.  Determinants of Effective Information Technology Governance , 2013 .

[22]  Paul P. Tallon A Process-Oriented Perspective on the Alignment of Information Technology and Business Strategy , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Gautam Ray,et al.  Information Technology and the Performance of the Customer Service Process: A Resource-Based Analysis , 2005, MIS Q..

[24]  Peter Weill,et al.  Managing Investment in Information Technology: Mini Case Examples and Implications , 1989, MIS Q..

[25]  T. C. Powell,et al.  Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human , 1997 .

[26]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Antecedents of IS Strategic Alignment: A Nomological Network , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[27]  Theophanis C. Stratopoulos,et al.  Does successful investment in information technology solve the productivity paradox? , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[28]  Dharmendra Sharma,et al.  Governance Framework for Cloud Computing , 2010 .

[29]  Carla L. Wilkin,et al.  A Review of IT Governance: A Taxonomy to Inform Accounting Information Systems , 2010, J. Inf. Syst..

[30]  M. Wade,et al.  Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research , 2004 .

[31]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[32]  Acklesh Prasad,et al.  On Structural Considerations for Governing the Cloud , 2013, AMCIS.

[33]  Ofir Turel,et al.  Board-level IT governance and organizational performance , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Jonathan Whitaker,et al.  Information Technology, Production Process Outsourcing, and Manufacturing Plant Performance , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Wynne W. Chin Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[36]  Neven Vrcek,et al.  Cost effectiveness of commercial computing clouds , 2013, Inf. Syst..

[37]  Vicky Arnold,et al.  Enterprise Risk Management: Re-Conceptualizing the Role of Risk and Trust on Information Sharing in Transnational Alliances , 2014, J. Inf. Syst..

[38]  William L. Fuerst,et al.  Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis , 1995 .

[39]  A. Barua,et al.  The Information Technology Productivity Paradox Revisited: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation in the Manufacturing Sector , 1997 .

[40]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[41]  Arun Rai,et al.  How CIOs Can Align IT Capabilities for Supply Chain Relationships , 2009, MIS Q. Executive.

[42]  Walter Brenner,et al.  Toward a model of effective monitoring of IT application development and maintenance suppliers in multisourced environments , 2013, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Rob Cross,et al.  A Relational View of Information Seeking and Learning in Social Networks , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[44]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Determinants of Information Technology Outsourcing: A Cross-Sectional Analysis , 2011, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[45]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Collective Outsourcing to Market (Com): A Market-Based Framework for Information Supply Chain Outsourcing , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[46]  Steven De Haes,et al.  Enterprise Governance of Information Technology: Achieving Strategic Alignment and Value , 2009 .

[47]  G. Maffini,et al.  Profit Shifting and Measured Productivity of Multinational Firms , 2011 .

[48]  Bernhard R. Katzy,et al.  Innovation intermediaries: a process view on open innovation coordination , 2013, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[49]  Sheridan Titman,et al.  Financial Management: Principles and Applications , 2001 .

[50]  P. Weill,et al.  IT Governance , 2017 .

[51]  Jong-min Choe,et al.  The Relationships among Performance of Accounting Information Systems, Influence Factors, and Evolution Level of Information Systems , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[52]  Waleed A. Muhanna,et al.  Information Technology and Process Performance: An Empirical Investigation of the Interaction Between IT and Non-IT Resources , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[53]  Steven De Haes,et al.  COBIT 5 and Enterprise Governance of Information Technology: Building Blocks and Research Opportunities , 2013, J. Inf. Syst..

[54]  Kishore Singh,et al.  Continuous Auditing and Continuous Monitoring in ERP Environments: Case Studies of Application Implementations , 2014, J. Inf. Syst..

[55]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Role of Trustworthiness in Reducing Transaction Costs and Improving Performance: Empirical Evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea , 2003 .

[56]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A critical look at partial least squares modeling , 2009 .

[57]  Randy H. Katz,et al.  A view of cloud computing , 2010, CACM.

[58]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[59]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[60]  Ofir Turel,et al.  IT and the Board of Directors: An Empirical Investigation into the "Governance Questions" Canadian Board Members Ask about IT , 2010, J. Inf. Syst..

[61]  Roger S. Debreceny,et al.  Research on IT Governance, Risk, and Value: Challenges and Opportunities , 2013, J. Inf. Syst..

[62]  Somnath Bhattacharya,et al.  Disclosure of outsourcing in the annual report: Causes and market returns effects , 2012, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[63]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  How Information Technology Governance Mechanisms and Strategic Alignment Influence Organizational Performance: Insights from a Matched Survey of Business and IT Managers , 2015, MIS Q..

[64]  D. Teece Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[65]  Subhajyoti Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Cloud computing - The business perspective , 2011, Decis. Support Syst..

[66]  Pedro Miguel Fernandes Ruivo,et al.  Examine ERP post-implementation stages of use and value: Empirical evidence from Portuguese SMEs , 2014, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[67]  Nemit Shroff,et al.  Information Environment and the Investment Decisions of Multinational Corporations , 2013 .

[68]  Nicholas Bloom,et al.  Why Do Firms in Developing Countries Have Low Productivity , 2010 .

[69]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares , 1999 .

[70]  W. V. Grembergen,et al.  Structures, Processes and Relational Mechanisms for IT Governance , 2004 .

[71]  L. Willcocks,et al.  Beyond the It Productivity Paradox , 1999 .

[72]  Tiago Oliveira,et al.  Assessing the determinants of cloud computing adoption: An analysis of the manufacturing and services sectors , 2014, Inf. Manag..

[73]  K. M. Bartol,et al.  Organizational context and face-to-face interaction: Influences on the development of trust and collaborative behaviors in computer-mediated groups , 2009 .

[74]  Arun Rai,et al.  Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities , 2006 .

[75]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[76]  D. Dillman Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[77]  Edmund Green,et al.  Systems Thinking and its Implications in Enterprise Risk Management , 2015, J. Inf. Syst..

[78]  Steven De Haes,et al.  An Exploratory Study into the Design of an IT Governance Minimum Baseline through Delphi Research , 2008, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[79]  Julia Brande Earp,et al.  Centralized end-to-end identity and access management and ERP systems: A multi-case analysis using the Technology Organization Environment framework , 2014, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..