An application of upper-extremity constraint-induced movement therapy in a patient with subacute stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The purpose of this case report is to demonstrate the application of constraint-induced movement therapy with an individual with upper-extremity hemiparesis within 4 months after sustaining a cerebrovascular accident (stroke). Such patients often fail to develop full potential use of their affected upper extremity, perhaps due to a "learned nonuse phenomenon." CASE DESCRIPTION The patient was a 61-year-old woman with right-sided hemiparesis resulting from an ischemic lacunar infarct in the posterior limb of the left internal capsule. The patient's less-involved hand was constrained in a mitten so that she could not use the hand during waking hours, except for bathing and toileting. On each weekday of the 14-day intervention period, the patient spent 6 hours being supervised while performing tasks using the paretic upper extremity. Pretreatment, posttreatment, and 3-month follow-up outcome measures included the Wolf Motor Function Test and the Motor Activity Log (MAL). OUTCOMES For the Wolf Motor Function Test, both the mean and median times to complete 16 tasks improved from pretreatment to posttreatment and from posttreatment to follow-up. Results of the MAL indicated an improved self-report of both "how well" and "how much" the patient used her affected limb in 30 specified daily tasks. These improvements persisted to the follow-up. DISCUSSION Two weeks of constraining the unaffected limb, coupled with practice of functional movements of the impaired limb, may be an effective method for restoring motor function within a few months after cerebral insult. Encouraging improvements such as these strongly suggest the need for a group design that would explore this type of intervention in more detail.

[1]  S. S. Tower PYRAMIDAL LESION IN THE MONKEY , 1940 .

[2]  E. Taub,et al.  AVOIDANCE CONDITIONING IN THE ABSENCE OF RELEVANT PROPRIOCEPTIVE AND EXTEROCEPTIVE FEEDBACK. , 1963, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[3]  E. Taub,et al.  Movements in monkeys with deafferented forelimbs. , 1963, Experimental neurology.

[4]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[5]  E. Taub,et al.  Deafferentation in monkeys: Pointing at a target without visual feedback , 1975, Experimental Neurology.

[6]  Douglas G. Stuart,et al.  Neural Control of Locomotion , 1976, Advances in Behavioral Biology.

[7]  Edward Taub,et al.  Motor Behavior Following Deafferentation in the Developing and Motorically Mature Monkey , 1976 .

[8]  E. Taub Movement In Nonhuman Primates Deprived Of Somatosensory Feedback , 1976, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[9]  L. Ince Behavioral psychology in rehabilitation medicine : clinical applications , 1980 .

[10]  S L Wolf,et al.  Effect of forced use of the upper extremity of a hemiplegic patient on changes in function. A single-case design. , 1981, Physical therapy.

[11]  S. Wolf,et al.  Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients , 1989, Experimental Neurology.

[12]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The functional anatomy of motor recovery after stroke in humans: A study with positron emission tomography , 1991, Annals of neurology.

[13]  D. Wade,et al.  Enhanced physical therapy improves recovery of arm function after stroke. A randomised controlled trial. , 1992, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[14]  Paul Bach-y-Rita,et al.  Recovery from Brain Damage , 1992 .

[15]  N. Miller,et al.  Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  T. Olsen,et al.  Compensation in recovery of upper extremity function after stroke: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  K. Mauritz,et al.  Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand , 1995, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[18]  Hemiplegic Upper Extremity Rehabilitation: A Review of the Forced-Use Paradigm , 1995 .

[19]  E. Taub,et al.  Constraint Induced Movement Techniques To Facilitate Upper Extremity Use in Stroke Patients. , 1997, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[20]  E. Taub,et al.  Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery after stroke. , 1997, NeuroRehabilitation.

[21]  E. Taub,et al.  Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: a replication. , 1999, Stroke.

[22]  Gitendra Uswatte,et al.  Constraint-induced movement therapy: New approaches to outcome measurement in rehabilitation. , 1999 .