Carefree Handling using Reactionary Envelope Protection Method

The operational envelope of a flight vehicle is constrained by a number of critical parameters known as limit parameters. These parameters are constrained to remain within certain bounds to ensure operational safety and in some cases performance of the vehicle. In the case of manned vehicles the task of maintaining vehicle operation within the operational flight envelope by monitoring limit parameter values vests with the pilot. In most situations this task of envelope protection increases pilot workload. Envelope protection systems reduce operational workload by monitoring and informing the pilot of approaching envelope boundaries. Recently, envelope protection methods that translate limit proximity information to its equivalent in the control channel have gained more acceptance. Reactionary envelope protection method is an approach developed for automatic envelope protection in Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. The approach relies on prescribing a safe-response profile for the limit parameter response near the limit boundary and then providing appropriate corrections to the control channel so that limit parameter response tracks the safe-response profile. In this paper, an extension to the reactionary envelope protection method is presented that allows control margins to be calculated for envelope protection. The development of this extension will allow the reactionary envelope protection method to be utilized within an envelope protection system for piloted vehicles. The proposed extension is used to implement a reactionary envelope protection system for R22 manifold pressure limit protection. Results comparing estimated reactionary envelope protection control limits againts previously validated envelope protection methods are also presented.

[1]  Ilkay Yavrucuk.  Adaptive limit margin detection and limit avoidance , 2003 .

[2]  Usmc,et al.  Carefree Handling and Its Applications To Military Helicopters and Missions , 1997 .

[3]  Joseph F. Horn.  Flight envelope limit detection and avoidance , 1999 .

[4]  G. D. Padfield,et al.  Helicopter Flight Dynamics: The Theory and Application of Flying Qualities and Simulation Modelling , 1995 .

[5]  Anthony J. Calise,et al.  Flight Envelope Limit Detection and Avoidance for Rotorcraft , 2002 .

[6]  Prasad,et al.  Envelope Protection in Autonomous Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2003 .

[7]  C P Massey,et al.  Carefree Handling Systems for Helicopters , 1992 .

[8]  David Ward,et al.  Development of Artificial Neural Networks for the HACT Flight Control System , 2002 .

[9]  J. L. Paunicka,et al.  The OCP - an open middleware solution for embedded systems , 2001 .

[10]  Anthony J. Calise,et al.  Carefree Maneuvering Using Adaptive Neural Networks , 2002 .

[11]  Joe,et al.  Simulation Investigation of a Comprehensive Collective-Axis Tactile Cueing System , 2002 .

[12]  Suraj,et al.  Reactionary Envelope Protection for Autonomous UAVs , 2005 .

[13]  Boeing,et al.  The RAH-66 Comanche Flight Envelope Cueing System , 1999 .

[14]  Eric N. Johnson,et al.  Adaptive Flight Control for an Autonomous Unmanned Helicopter , 2002 .

[15]  Joseph F. Horn,et al.  Detection and avoidance of main rotor hub moment limits on rotorcraft , 2001 .

[16]  Joseph F. Horn,et al.  Flight Envelope Cueing on a Tilt-Rotor Aircraft Using Neural Network Limit Prediction , 2001 .

[17]  Daniel P. Schrage,et al.  Software Enabled Control (SEC) for Intelligent UAVs , 2002 .

[18]  David G. Ward,et al.  Piloted simulation evaluation of a neural network limit avoidance system for rotorcraft , 1999 .

[19]  Nakwan Kim.  Improved Methods in Neural Network-Based Adaptive Output Feedback Control, with Applications to Flight Control , 2003 .

[20]  Suraj Unnikrishnan,et al.  Reactionary Automatic Envelope Protection for Autonomous Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2004 .

[21]  Suraj,et al.  Optimal Control Formulation and Non-Linear Trajectory Generation for Envelope Protection , 2005 .