Quality control of overcoring stress measurement data

The in situ state of stress is one of the key rock mechanics factors related to the safety and stability of underground excavations for civil and mining engineering purposes. However, measurement and interpretation of stress have their difficulties. In particular, practical and objective tools have not been developed to judge transient strain behaviour during overcoring. The work described in this paper was set up by the nuclear waste management companies Posiva Oy (Finland) and Svensk Karnbranslehantering AB (Sweden) to improve the quality of interpretation of overcoring stress measurement results. Thus, the primary product of the project is a quality control capability for overcoring stress measurement data. For this purpose, a computer program was developed which can simulate the transient strains and stresses during the overcoring process for any in situ stress and coring load conditions. The solution is based on superposition of elastic stresses and the basic idea can be applied for different overcoring probes with minor modifications and recalculation of stress tensors. The measured strains can be compared to the calculated ones to check whether the measured transient behaviour accords with the interpreted in situ state of stress. If not, the in situ state of stress can be calculated based on any transient or final strain values. The transient stresses can also be compared to a strength envelope of intact rock and thereby the core damage potential can be estimated.

[1]  Anna Laura Lopes da Silva Nunes,et al.  A new method for determination of transverse isotropic orientation and the associated elastic parameters for intact rock , 2002 .

[2]  B. Amadei,et al.  Determination of deformability and tensile strength of anisotropic rock using Brazilian tests , 1998 .

[3]  Jüri Martna,et al.  A new automatic probe for measuring triaxial rock stresses in deep bore holes , 1990 .

[4]  N. A. Chandler,et al.  In situ strength criteria for tunnel design in highly-stressed rock masses , 1998 .

[5]  E. Leeman The CSIR “doorstopper” and triaxial rock stress measuring instruments , 1971 .

[6]  Evert Hoek,et al.  Practical estimates of rock mass strength , 1997 .

[7]  C. Derek Martin,et al.  The effect of sample disturbance on laboratory properties of Lac du Bonnet granite , 1994 .

[8]  Yongyi Li Drilling induced core damages and their relationship to crustal in situ stress states and rock properties , 1997 .

[9]  B. Amadei Importance of anisotropy when estimating and measuring in situ stresses in rock , 1996 .

[10]  E. T. Brown Rock characterization, testing & monitoring: ISRM suggested methods , 1981 .

[11]  C. Martin,et al.  Overcoring in highly stressed granite— the influence of microcracking , 1990 .

[12]  H. Baroudi,et al.  Improvement in the interpretation of stress measurements by use of the overcoring method: development of a new approach , 1998 .

[13]  Bernard Amadei,et al.  Rock stress and its measurement , 1997 .