Leveraging Social Network Analysis for Characterizing Cohesion of Human-Managed Animals

Social network analysis (SNA) is a technique to study behavioral dynamics within a social group. In SNA, it is an open question whether it is possible to characterize animal-level behaviors by using group-level information. Also, it was believed that the combined use of SNA would provide a more comprehensive understanding of social dynamics. In light of these two factors, here we explain an approach to evaluate animal importance to a group by considering the variability in group-level structural information, which is computed by joining the animal- and group-level SNA measures node centrality and network entropy, respectively. Moreover, two other metrics, animal social interaction range and nearest-neighbor frequency matrix, which represent a social affiliation of each animal within the group, are computed to help address the general challenges in graph-based SNA and, thereby, improve the precision of animal importance measures. Finally, we derive the joint distribution of animal importance of the group in detecting atypical social behaviors. The approach is tested using tracking data of dairy cows. The reliability of the derived animal importance was superior to the already existing animal importance measures. To illustrate the usability of the animal importance metric, a simulation study was conducted to identify sick and estrus animals in a group. The social affiliation of sick cows was less when compared to healthy cows. Also, their individual distributions of animal importance were shifted toward the left of the mean of the animal importance distributions of healthy cows. Consequently, the joint distribution of animal importance of the group exhibited a bimodal distribution with a left tailored shape. The behavior of cows in estrus was opposite to that of sick cows. Moreover, with the increasing number of sick and estrus cows in the group, respectively, the group entropy decreased with larger variance and slightly increased with less variance. Therefore, the entropy-based animal importance metric has superior performances when evaluating animal importance to the group compared to the existing metrics. It can be used for generating alerts for the early detection of atypical social behaviors associated with, for instance, animal health, veterinary, and welfare.

[1]  P. Fricke,et al.  Expression and detection of estrus in dairy cows: the role of new technologies. , 2014, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[2]  G. Parisi,et al.  The STARFLAG handbook on collective animal behaviour: Part II, three-dimensional analysis , 2008, 0802.1674.

[3]  R. James,et al.  The social network structure of a dynamic group of dairy cows:from individual to group level patterns , 2016 .

[4]  Tina W. Wey,et al.  Social network analysis of animal behaviour: a promising tool for the study of sociality , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  G. Parisi,et al.  Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Alper Yilmaz,et al.  A SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS APPROACH TO ANALYZE ROAD NETWORKS , 2010 .

[7]  D M Weary,et al.  Clinical ketosis and standing behavior in transition cows. , 2015, Journal of dairy science.

[8]  Khaled Elleithy,et al.  Mobile and Wi-Fi Geo location using Google Latitude , 2013, 2013 World Congress on Computer and Information Technology (WCCIT).

[9]  Steven D. Prager,et al.  The dynamics of animal social networks: analytical, conceptual, and theoretical advances , 2014 .

[10]  Douglas A. Reynolds Gaussian Mixture Models , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[11]  B Kemp,et al.  Various behavioral signs of estrous and their relationship with time of ovulation in dairy cattle. , 2005, Theriogenology.

[12]  Xinbo Ai,et al.  Node Importance Ranking of Complex Networks with Entropy Variation , 2017, Entropy.

[13]  N. Boyland The influence of social networks on welfare and productivity in dairy cattle , 2015 .

[14]  Peter I. Corke,et al.  Monitoring Animal Behaviour and Environmental Interactions Using Wireless Sensor Networks, GPS Collars and Satellite Remote Sensing , 2009, Sensors.

[15]  Cun-Quan Zhang,et al.  Laplacian centrality: A new centrality measure for weighted networks , 2012, Inf. Sci..

[16]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Centrality metric for dynamic networks , 2010, MLG '10.

[17]  K.K. Pramod,et al.  An Axiomatic Definition of Shannon's Entropy , 1992 .

[18]  J. Routly,et al.  Lameness, activity time-budgets, and estrus expression in dairy cattle. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[19]  Annamaria Conte,et al.  A New Weighted Degree Centrality Measure: The Application in an Animal Disease Epidemic , 2016, PloS one.

[20]  Heejin Kim,et al.  Real-time Temperature Monitoring to Enhance Estrus Detection in Cattle Utilizing Ingestible Bio-Sensors : Method & Case Studies , 2017 .

[21]  V. Cabrera,et al.  Robotic milking: Feeding strategies and economic returns. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[22]  Cun-Quan Zhang,et al.  Terrorist Networks, Network Energy and Node Removal: A New Measure of Centrality Based on Laplacian Energy , 2013 .

[23]  E. Pennisi Social Animals Prove Their Smarts , 2006, Science.

[24]  L. Gygax,et al.  Choice of scan-sampling intervals—An example with quantifying neighbours in dairy cows , 2009 .

[25]  Z. Nogalski,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF SOCIAL HIERARCHY IN A DAIRY CATTLE HERD ON MILK YIELD , 2010 .

[26]  G. Martino,et al.  Social Network Analysis in Encouraging Role-Players in the Beef Market to Take Breeding Decisions: A Methodological Study , 2013 .

[27]  C. Dubé,et al.  An analysis of the movement of dairy cattle through 2 large livestock markets in the province of Ontario, Canada. , 2010, The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne.

[28]  Daniel V. Smith,et al.  A comparison of autoencoder and statistical features for cattle behaviour classification , 2016, 2016 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN).

[29]  Mason A. Porter,et al.  Modeling the lowest-cost splitting of a herd of cows by optimizing a cost function , 2016, Chaos.

[30]  Anuradha Goswami,et al.  Challenges in the Analysis of Online Social Networks: A Data Collection Tool Perspective , 2017, Wireless Personal Communications.

[31]  B. A. Wood,et al.  Agricultural Science in the Wild: A Social Network Analysis of Farmer Knowledge Exchange , 2014, PloS one.

[32]  M. Nöremark,et al.  Network analysis of cattle and pig movements in Sweden: measures relevant for disease control and risk based surveillance. , 2011, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[33]  P. Koene,et al.  Social Networks and Welfare in Future Animal Management , 2014, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[34]  Nikolai W. F. Bode,et al.  Copycat dynamics in leaderless animal group navigation , 2014 .

[35]  Ross J. Anderson,et al.  Temporal node centrality in complex networks. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[36]  Martin Nordal Petersen,et al.  GPS-free geolocation using LoRa in low-power WANs , 2017, 2017 Global Internet of Things Summit (GIoTS).

[37]  F. Skjøth,et al.  Effects of hunger level and tube diameter on the feeding behavior of teat-fed dairy calves. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[38]  Sean A. Rands,et al.  Nearest-neighbour clusters as a novel technique for assessing group associations , 2015, Royal Society Open Science.