Monitoring tumour response during chemo-radiotherapy: a parametric method using FDG-PET/CT images in patients with oesophageal cancer
暂无分享,去创建一个
Irène Buvat | Pierre Michel | Pierre Vera | Bernard Dubray | Isabelle Gardin | Sébastien Hapdey | Romain Modzelewski | Caroline Rousseau | Marc-Etienne Meyer | I. Buvat | R. Modzelewski | B. Dubray | S. Hapdey | I. Gardin | S. Bardet | P. Vera | P. Michel | M. Meyer | Stéphane Bardet | C. Rousseau | Odré Palie | Ahmed Benyoucef | Frederic Di Fiore | F. Fiore | Odré Palie | A. Benyoucef
[1] R. Hicks. Role of 18 F-FDG PET in Assessment of Response in Non – Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2009 .
[2] Val Gebski,et al. Survival benefits from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy in oesophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis. , 2007, The Lancet. Oncology.
[3] Ronald Boellaard,et al. The Netherlands protocol for standardisation and quantification of FDG whole body PET studies in multi-centre trials , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[4] Sigrid Stroobants,et al. Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[5] H. Groen,et al. Systematic review of the staging performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in esophageal cancer. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[6] Wolfgang A Weber,et al. Use of PET for monitoring cancer therapy and for predicting outcome. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[7] B. Krause,et al. 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FDG PET/CT for Assessing Response to Therapy in Esophageal Cancer , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[8] A. Fischman,et al. Dose-response relationship between probability of pathologic tumor control and glucose metabolic rate measured with FDG PET after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[9] R. Boellaard,et al. Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[10] M. Salvatore,et al. [18F]FDG-PET-CT for early monitoring of tumor response: when and why. , 2009, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of....
[11] T. Takahara,et al. Diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression facilitates detection and evaluation of an anterior rib contusion. , 2010, Clinical imaging.
[12] Peter D Siersema,et al. Esophageal cancer. , 2008, Gastroenterology clinics of North America.
[13] Pierre Vera,et al. Serial assessment of FDG-PET FDG uptake and functional volume during radiotherapy (RT) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). , 2012, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.
[14] H. Fukuda,et al. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and International Society for Cutaneous Lymphoma (ISCL) consensus recommendations for the management of cutaneous B-cell lymphomas Blood 2008; 112(5):1600-9 , 2022 .
[15] K. Herholz,et al. Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group. , 1999, European journal of cancer.
[16] M. Schwaiger,et al. Comparison of different SUV-based methods for monitoring cytotoxic therapy with FDG PET , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[17] S. Ben-Haim,et al. 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in the Evaluation of Cancer Treatment Response* , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[18] Issam El-Naqa,et al. Exploring feature-based approaches in PET images for predicting cancer treatment outcomes , 2009, Pattern Recognit..
[19] J. Yue,et al. Prognostic value of serial [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT uptake in stage III patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated by concurrent chemoradiotherapy. , 2011, European journal of radiology.
[20] Irène Buvat,et al. Detection and Characterization of Tumor Changes in 18F-FDG PET Patient Monitoring Using Parametric Imaging , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[21] R. Boellaard. Need for Standardization of 18F-FDG PET/CT for Treatment Response Assessments , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[22] J. Cooper,et al. Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in patients with cancer of the esophagus. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.
[23] Danny Rischin,et al. Positron emission tomography is superior to computed tomography scanning for response-assessment after radical radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[24] I Gardin,et al. Use of subtraction ictal SPECT co-registered to MRI for optimizing the localization of seizure foci in children. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[25] N. Holalkere,et al. Adenocarcinomas of the esophagus: response to chemoradiotherapy is associated with decrease of metabolic tumor volume as measured on PET-CT. Comparison to histopathologic and clinical response evaluation. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.
[26] J. V. van Sandick,et al. Systematic review of the benefits and risks of neoadjuvant chemoradiation for oesophageal cancer , 2010, The British journal of surgery.
[27] Dimitris Visvikis,et al. Baseline 18F-FDG PET image-derived parameters for therapy response prediction in oesophageal cancer , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[28] M. Hatt,et al. Intratumor Heterogeneity Characterized by Textural Features on Baseline 18F-FDG PET Images Predicts Response to Concomitant Radiochemotherapy in Esophageal Cancer , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[29] R. Hicks. Role of 18F-FDG PET in Assessment of Response in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[30] T. Miller,et al. Evaluation of response to neoadjuvant therapy by quantitative 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose with positron emission tomography in patients with esophageal cancer. , 2002, Molecular imaging and biology : MIB : the official publication of the Academy of Molecular Imaging.
[31] Soo Young Kim,et al. Value of complete metabolic response by (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in oesophageal cancer for prediction of pathologic response and survival after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. , 2007, European journal of cancer.
[32] Klemens Scheidhauer,et al. Use of positron emission tomography for response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[33] B. Krause,et al. New trends for staging and therapy for localized gastroesophageal cancer: the role of PET. , 2010, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[34] M. Keighley. Gastrointestinal cancers in Europe , 2003, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.
[35] E. Itti,et al. The predictive value of treatment response using FDG PET performed on day 21 of chemoradiotherapy in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. A prospective, multicentre study (RTEP3) , 2013, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[36] C. Copie-Bergman,et al. Interim [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scan in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy plus rituximab. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[37] M Vermandel,et al. An easy-to-use phantom and protocol for weekly PET quality assessment: A multicenter study. , 2008, Medical physics.
[38] J Nucl Med , 2010 .
[39] O. Rigal,et al. Response to Definitive Chemoradiotherapy and Survival in Patients with an Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma versus Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Matched-Pair Analysis , 2008, Oncology.
[40] L. Mortelmans,et al. Positron emission tomography for assessment of the response to induction radiochemotherapy in locally advanced oesophageal cancer. , 2002, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[41] Xavier Geets,et al. Impact of the type of imaging modality on target volumes delineation and dose distribution in pharyngo-laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: comparison between pre- and per-treatment studies. , 2006, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.
[42] Tejpal Gupta,et al. Diagnostic performance of response assessment FDG-PET/CT in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with high-precision definitive (chemo)radiation. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.
[43] Florent Tixier,et al. Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET image-based parameters in oesophageal cancer and impact of tumour delineation methodology , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.