Monitoring tumour response during chemo-radiotherapy: a parametric method using FDG-PET/CT images in patients with oesophageal cancer

BackgroundThe objective of this study is to investigate the feasibility and the additional interest of a parametric imaging (PI) method to monitor the early tumour metabolic response in a prospective series of oesophageal cancer patients who underwent positron emission tomography with fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG-PET/CT) before and during curative-intent chemo-radiotherapy.MethodsFifty-seven patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oesophagus prospectively underwent FDG-PET/CT before chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) (PET1) and at 21 ± 3 days after the beginning of CRT (PET2). The outcome was assessed at 3 months and 1 year after the completion of CRT (clinical examination, CT scan or FDG-PET/CT, biopsy). For each patient, PET1 and PET2 were registered using CT images. The 2 PET image sets were subtracted, so the voxels with significant changes in FDG uptake were identified. A model-based analysis of this graph was used to identify the tumour voxels in which significant changes occurred between the two scans and yielded indices characterising these changes (green and red clusters). Quantitative parameters were compared with clinical outcome at 3 months and at 1 year.ResultsThe baseline tumour FDG uptake decreased significantly at PET2 (p < 0.0001). The tumour volume significantly decreased between PET1 and PET2 (p < 0.02). The initial functional volume of the lesion (TV1) was significantly lower (p < 0.02) in patients in clinical response (CR) at 3 months and 1 year. The volume of the lesion during the treatment (TV2) was significantly lower in patients identified as in CR at 3 months (p < 0.03), but did not predict the outcome at 1 year. Multivariate analyses of outcome at 3 months showed that the risk of failure/death increased with younger age (p = 0.001), larger metabolic volume on PET1 (p = 0.009) and larger volume with decreased FDG uptake (p = 0.047). As for outcome at 1 year, the risk of failure/death increased with younger age (p = 0.006), nodal involvement (p = 0.08) and larger volumes with increased uptake (p = 0.03).ConclusionA parametric method to assess tumour response on serial FDG-PET performed during chemo-radiotherapy was evaluated. Early metabolic changes, i.e. variations in FDG uptake, provided additional prognostic information in multivariate analyses ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 00934505.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN7824458

[1]  R. Hicks Role of 18 F-FDG PET in Assessment of Response in Non – Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2009 .

[2]  Val Gebski,et al.  Survival benefits from neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy in oesophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis. , 2007, The Lancet. Oncology.

[3]  Ronald Boellaard,et al.  The Netherlands protocol for standardisation and quantification of FDG whole body PET studies in multi-centre trials , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[4]  Sigrid Stroobants,et al.  Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  H. Groen,et al.  Systematic review of the staging performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in esophageal cancer. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  Wolfgang A Weber,et al.  Use of PET for monitoring cancer therapy and for predicting outcome. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  B. Krause,et al.  18F-FDG PET and 18F-FDG PET/CT for Assessing Response to Therapy in Esophageal Cancer , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  A. Fischman,et al.  Dose-response relationship between probability of pathologic tumor control and glucose metabolic rate measured with FDG PET after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  R. Boellaard,et al.  Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  M. Salvatore,et al.  [18F]FDG-PET-CT for early monitoring of tumor response: when and why. , 2009, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of....

[11]  T. Takahara,et al.  Diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression facilitates detection and evaluation of an anterior rib contusion. , 2010, Clinical imaging.

[12]  Peter D Siersema,et al.  Esophageal cancer. , 2008, Gastroenterology clinics of North America.

[13]  Pierre Vera,et al.  Serial assessment of FDG-PET FDG uptake and functional volume during radiotherapy (RT) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). , 2012, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[14]  H. Fukuda,et al.  European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and International Society for Cutaneous Lymphoma (ISCL) consensus recommendations for the management of cutaneous B-cell lymphomas Blood 2008; 112(5):1600-9 , 2022 .

[15]  K. Herholz,et al.  Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group. , 1999, European journal of cancer.

[16]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Comparison of different SUV-based methods for monitoring cytotoxic therapy with FDG PET , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[17]  S. Ben-Haim,et al.  18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in the Evaluation of Cancer Treatment Response* , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  Issam El-Naqa,et al.  Exploring feature-based approaches in PET images for predicting cancer treatment outcomes , 2009, Pattern Recognit..

[19]  J. Yue,et al.  Prognostic value of serial [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT uptake in stage III patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated by concurrent chemoradiotherapy. , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[20]  Irène Buvat,et al.  Detection and Characterization of Tumor Changes in 18F-FDG PET Patient Monitoring Using Parametric Imaging , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  R. Boellaard Need for Standardization of 18F-FDG PET/CT for Treatment Response Assessments , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  J. Cooper,et al.  Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in patients with cancer of the esophagus. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  Danny Rischin,et al.  Positron emission tomography is superior to computed tomography scanning for response-assessment after radical radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  I Gardin,et al.  Use of subtraction ictal SPECT co-registered to MRI for optimizing the localization of seizure foci in children. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[25]  N. Holalkere,et al.  Adenocarcinomas of the esophagus: response to chemoradiotherapy is associated with decrease of metabolic tumor volume as measured on PET-CT. Comparison to histopathologic and clinical response evaluation. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[26]  J. V. van Sandick,et al.  Systematic review of the benefits and risks of neoadjuvant chemoradiation for oesophageal cancer , 2010, The British journal of surgery.

[27]  Dimitris Visvikis,et al.  Baseline 18F-FDG PET image-derived parameters for therapy response prediction in oesophageal cancer , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[28]  M. Hatt,et al.  Intratumor Heterogeneity Characterized by Textural Features on Baseline 18F-FDG PET Images Predicts Response to Concomitant Radiochemotherapy in Esophageal Cancer , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[29]  R. Hicks Role of 18F-FDG PET in Assessment of Response in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[30]  T. Miller,et al.  Evaluation of response to neoadjuvant therapy by quantitative 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose with positron emission tomography in patients with esophageal cancer. , 2002, Molecular imaging and biology : MIB : the official publication of the Academy of Molecular Imaging.

[31]  Soo Young Kim,et al.  Value of complete metabolic response by (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in oesophageal cancer for prediction of pathologic response and survival after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. , 2007, European journal of cancer.

[32]  Klemens Scheidhauer,et al.  Use of positron emission tomography for response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  B. Krause,et al.  New trends for staging and therapy for localized gastroesophageal cancer: the role of PET. , 2010, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[34]  M. Keighley Gastrointestinal cancers in Europe , 2003, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[35]  E. Itti,et al.  The predictive value of treatment response using FDG PET performed on day 21 of chemoradiotherapy in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. A prospective, multicentre study (RTEP3) , 2013, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[36]  C. Copie-Bergman,et al.  Interim [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scan in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy plus rituximab. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[37]  M Vermandel,et al.  An easy-to-use phantom and protocol for weekly PET quality assessment: A multicenter study. , 2008, Medical physics.

[38]  J Nucl Med , 2010 .

[39]  O. Rigal,et al.  Response to Definitive Chemoradiotherapy and Survival in Patients with an Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma versus Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Matched-Pair Analysis , 2008, Oncology.

[40]  L. Mortelmans,et al.  Positron emission tomography for assessment of the response to induction radiochemotherapy in locally advanced oesophageal cancer. , 2002, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[41]  Xavier Geets,et al.  Impact of the type of imaging modality on target volumes delineation and dose distribution in pharyngo-laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: comparison between pre- and per-treatment studies. , 2006, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[42]  Tejpal Gupta,et al.  Diagnostic performance of response assessment FDG-PET/CT in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with high-precision definitive (chemo)radiation. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[43]  Florent Tixier,et al.  Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET image-based parameters in oesophageal cancer and impact of tumour delineation methodology , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.