Strategic Stability in Poisson Games

In Poisson games, an extension of perfect equilibrium based on perturbations of the strategy space does not guarantee that players use admissible actions. This observation suggests that such a class of perturbations is not the correct one. We characterize the right space of perturbations to define perfect equilibrium in Poisson games. Furthermore, we use such a space to define the corresponding strategically stable sets of equilibria. We show that they satisfy existence, admissibility, and robustness against iterated deletion of dominated strategies and inferior replies.

[1]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Comparison of Scoring Rules in Poisson Voting Games , 2002, J. Econ. Theory.

[2]  Artyom Shneyerov,et al.  Dynamic Matching, Two-Sided Incomplete Information, and Participation Costs: Existence and Convergence to Perfect Competition , 2007 .

[3]  A. W. Tucker,et al.  Contributions to the Theory of Games , 1953 .

[4]  H. Raiffa,et al.  Games and Decisions: Introduction and Critical Survey. , 1958 .

[5]  Robert Wilson,et al.  Metastable Equilibria , 2006, Math. Oper. Res..

[6]  Philip Wolfe,et al.  Contributions to the theory of games , 1953 .

[7]  W. Arthur Inductive Reasoning, Bounded Rationality and the Bar Problem , 1994 .

[8]  R. Bass,et al.  Review: P. Billingsley, Convergence of probability measures , 1971 .

[9]  John Hillas,et al.  On the Definition of the Strategic Stability of Equilibria , 1990 .

[10]  J. Mertens,et al.  ON THE STRATEGIC STABILITY OF EQUILIBRIA , 1986 .

[11]  Niall Hughes,et al.  Voting in legislative elections under plurality rule , 2016, J. Econ. Theory.

[12]  Philippe Jehiel,et al.  On Discrimination in Procurement Auctions , 2014 .

[13]  Laurent Bouton A Theory of Strategic Voting in Runoff Elections , 2013 .

[14]  Klaus Ritzberger Price competition with population uncertainty , 2009, Math. Soc. Sci..

[15]  W. Arthur Inductive Reasoning and Bounded Rationality , 1994 .

[16]  Miltiadis Makris Complementarities and macroeconomics: Poisson games , 2008, Games Econ. Behav..

[17]  Andrew McLennan,et al.  Manipulation in elections with uncertain preferences , 2011 .

[18]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Population uncertainty and Poisson games , 1998, Int. J. Game Theory.

[19]  D. Gale,et al.  4. SOLUTIONS OF FINITE TWO-PERSON GAMES , 1951 .

[20]  Laurent Bouton,et al.  Majority runoff elections: Strategic voting and Duverger's hypothesis , 2015 .

[21]  Matías Núñez,et al.  The strategic sincerity of Approval voting , 2014 .

[22]  Jean-François Mertens Stable Equilibria - A Reformulation. Part II. Discussion of the Definition, and Further Results , 1991, Math. Oper. Res..

[23]  Laurent Bouton,et al.  One Person, Many Votes: Divided Majority and Information Aggregation , 2008 .

[24]  David Pearce Rationalizable Strategic Behavior and the Problem of Perfection , 1984 .

[25]  Oriol Carbonell-Nicolau On the existence of pure-strategy perfect equilibrium in discontinuous games , 2011, Games Econ. Behav..

[26]  Maxwell B. Stinchcombe,et al.  Equilibrium Refinement for Infinite Normal-Form Games , 1995 .

[27]  Oriol Carbonell-Nicolau,et al.  Essential equilibria in normal-form games , 2010, J. Econ. Theory.

[28]  Nabil I. Al-Najjar Strategically Stable Equilibria in Games with Infinitely Many Pure Strategies , 1992 .

[29]  Jean-François Mertens Stable Equilibria - A Reformulation: Part I. Definition and Basic Properties , 1989, Math. Oper. Res..

[30]  Miltiadis Makris,et al.  Private provision of discrete public goods , 2009, Games Econ. Behav..

[31]  E. Kohlberg,et al.  Foundations of Strategic Equilibrium , 1996 .

[32]  François Maniquet,et al.  Approval quorums dominate participation quorums , 2015, Soc. Choice Welf..

[33]  Francesco De Sinopoli,et al.  Undominated (and) perfect equilibria in Poisson games , 2009, Games Econ. Behav..

[34]  Igal Milchtaich,et al.  Random-player games , 2004, Games Econ. Behav..

[35]  Wen-Tsun Wu,et al.  ESSENTIAL EQUILIBRIUM POINTS OF n-PERSON NON-COOPERATIVE GAMES , 1962 .

[36]  H. F. Bohnenblust,et al.  Solutions of Discrete, Two-Person Games , 1949 .

[37]  T. Ichiishi,et al.  Game Theory and Applications , 1990 .

[38]  E. Kohlberg Refinement of Nash Equilibrium: The Main Ideas , 1990 .

[39]  R. Selten Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games , 1975, Classics in Game Theory.