Development of a fully automatic shape model matching (FASMM) system to derive statistical shape models from radiographs: application to the accurate capture and global representation of proximal femur shape.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the accuracy and sensitivity of a fully automatic shape model matching (FASMM) system to derive statistical shape models (SSMs) of the proximal femur from non-standardised anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs. DESIGN AP pelvic radiographs obtained with informed consent and appropriate ethical approval were available for 1105 subjects with unilateral hip osteoarthritis (OA) who had been recruited previously for The arcOGEN Study. The FASMM system was applied to capture the shape of the unaffected (i.e., without signs of radiographic OA) proximal femur from these radiographs. The accuracy and sensitivity of the FASMM system in calculating geometric measurements of the proximal femur and in shape representation were evaluated relative to validated manual methods. RESULTS De novo application of the FASMM system had a mean point-to-curve error of less than 0.9 mm in 99% of images (n = 266). Geometric measurements generated by the FASMM system were as accurate as those obtained manually. The analysis of the SSMs generated by the FASMM system for male and female subject groups identified more significant differences (in five of 17 SSM modes after Bonferroni adjustment) in their global proximal femur shape than those obtained from the analysis of conventional geometric measurements. Multivariate gender-classification accuracy was higher when using SSM mode values (76.3%) than when using conventional hip geometric measurements (71.8%). CONCLUSIONS The FASMM system rapidly and accurately generates a global SSM of the proximal femur from radiographs of varying quality and resolution. This system will facilitate complex morphometric analysis of global shape variation across large datasets. The FASMM system could be adapted to generate SSMs from the radiographs of other skeletal structures such as the hand, knee or pelvis.

[1]  A. Silman,et al.  Predicting OA progression to total hip replacement: can we do better than risk factors alone using active shape modelling as an imaging biomarker? , 2012, Rheumatology.

[2]  M. Beck,et al.  Do Normal Radiographs Exclude Asphericity of the Femoral Head-Neck Junction? , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  F. Berenbaum,et al.  Osteoarthritis: an update with relevance for clinical practice , 2011, The Lancet.

[4]  S. Bierma-Zeinstra,et al.  Total hip replacement but not clinical osteoarthritis can be predicted by the shape of the hip: a prospective cohort study (CHECK). , 2012, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[5]  M. Doherty,et al.  Quantifying the Characteristics of the Acetabulum and Proximal Femur using a Semi-automated Hip Morphology Software Programme (SHIPS) , 2013, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.

[6]  Andres Metspalu,et al.  Identification of new susceptibility loci for osteoarthritis (arcOGEN): a genome-wide association study , 2012, The Lancet.

[7]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[8]  Charles E McCulloch,et al.  Variant alleles of the Wnt antagonist FRZB are determinants of hip shape and modify the relationship between hip shape and osteoarthritis. , 2012, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[9]  Michael Doherty,et al.  Nonspherical femoral head shape (pistol grip deformity), neck shaft angle, and risk of hip osteoarthritis: a case-control study. , 2008, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[10]  T. Spector,et al.  The association between hip morphology parameters and nineteen-year risk of end-stage osteoarthritis of the hip: A nested case–control study , 2011, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[11]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[12]  R. Aspden,et al.  A method for assessment of the shape of the proximal femur and its relationship to osteoporotic hip fracture , 2004, Osteoporosis International.

[13]  M. Nevitt,et al.  Changes in proximal femoral mineral geometry precede the onset of radiographic hip osteoarthritis: The study of osteoporotic fractures. , 2009, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[14]  M. Nevitt,et al.  The association of proximal femoral shape and incident radiographic hip OA in elderly women. , 2009, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[15]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Accurate Fully Automatic Femur Segmentation in Pelvic Radiographs Using Regression Voting , 2012, MICCAI.

[16]  S. Bierma-Zeinstra,et al.  A statistical model of shape and density of the proximal femur in relation to radiological and clinical OA of the hip. , 2010, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[17]  P. Beaulé,et al.  Validity of the Alpha Angle Measurement on Plain Radiographs in the Evaluation of Cam-type Femoroacetabular Impingement , 2011, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  J. Houwing-Duistermaat,et al.  Osteoarthritis susceptibility genes influence the association between hip morphology and osteoarthritis. , 2011, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[19]  R. Ganz,et al.  Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  S. Bierma-Zeinstra,et al.  Cam impingement causes osteoarthritis of the hip: a nationwide prospective cohort study (CHECK) , 2012, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[21]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Short-term variability of proximal femur shape in anteroposterior pelvic radiographs , 2011, MIUA.