fMRI studies of sensitivity and habituation effects within the auditory cortex at 1.5 T and 3 T

To assess habituation effects in relation to field strength by fMRI at 1.5 vs. 3.0 T within the auditory cortex of healthy subjects.

[1]  S. Ogawa,et al.  Oxygenation‐sensitive contrast in magnetic resonance image of rodent brain at high magnetic fields , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  R. Turner,et al.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  J. Strupp.  Stimulate: A GUI based fMRI analysis software package , 1996, NeuroImage.

[4]  J. Voyvodic,et al.  High‐resolution echo‐planar fMRI of human visual cortex at 3.0 tesla , 1997, NMR in biomedicine.

[5]  S. Posse,et al.  Intensity coding of auditory stimuli: an fMRI study , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  K Scheffler,et al.  Motor, somatosensory and auditory cortex localization by fMRI and MEG , 1998, Neuroreport.

[7]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Event-related fMRI of the auditory cortex. , 1998, NeuroImage.

[8]  K. Scheffler,et al.  Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex as detected by BOLD-FMRI , 1998, Hearing Research.

[9]  S. Moffat,et al.  Morphology of the planum temporale and corpus callosum in left handers with evidence of left and right hemisphere speech representation. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  L. Jäncke,et al.  The Effect of Sequence Repeat Time on Auditory Cortex Stimulation During Phonetic Discrimination , 1998, NeuroImage.

[11]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The Effect of Normal Aging on the Coupling of Neural Activity to the Bold Hemodynamic Response , 1999, NeuroImage.

[12]  H. E. Brown,et al.  Utilizing hemodynamic delay and dispersion to detect fMRI signal change without auditory interference: The behavior interleaved gradients technique , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  R. Weisskoff,et al.  Quantitative assessment of auditory cortex responses induced by imager acoustic noise , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[14]  O. Zafiris,et al.  The Effect of Sequence Repeat Time on Auditory Cortex Stimulation During Phonetic Discrimination , 1998, NeuroImage.

[15]  Y Yang,et al.  A silent event‐related functional MRI technique for brain activation studies without interference of scanner acoustic noise , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  Yasushi Miyashita,et al.  Functional Differentiation in the Human Auditory and Language Areas Revealed by a Dichotic Listening Task , 2000, NeuroImage.

[17]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal , 2001, Nature.

[18]  S. Francis,et al.  Single‐shot T  *2 measurement to establish optimum echo time for fMRI: Studies of the visual, motor, and auditory cortices at 3.0 T , 2001, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[19]  B. Bernal,et al.  Auditory functional MR imaging. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  G. McCarthy,et al.  The Effects of Aging upon the Hemodynamic Response Measured by Functional MRI , 2001, NeuroImage.

[21]  Robert Turner,et al.  Echo Time Dependence of BOLD Contrast and Susceptibility Artifacts , 2001, NeuroImage.

[22]  B. Pfleiderer,et al.  Visualization of Auditory Habituation by fMRI , 2002, NeuroImage.

[23]  W. Heindel,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging protocols for examination of the neurocranium at 3 T , 2003, European Radiology.

[24]  B. Pfleiderer,et al.  Altered Habituation in the Auditory Cortex in a Subgroup of Depressed Patients by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2004, Neuropsychobiology.

[25]  J. Duyn,et al.  EPI‐BOLD fMRI of human motor cortex at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: Sensitivity dependence on echo time and acquisition bandwidth , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.