After-effects of repetitive anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on learning and memory in a rat model of Alzheimer’s disease

Repetitive anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in a rat model of Alzheimer's disease (AD) has been shown to have distinct neuroprotective effects. Moreover, the effects of anodal tDCS not only occur during the stimulation but also persist after the stimulation has ended (after-effects). Here, the duration of the after-effects induced by repetitive anodal tDCS was investigated based on our previous studies. Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into three groups: a sham group, a β-amyloid (Aβ) group (AD group) and a stimulation group (ATD group). Aβ was injected into the bilateral hippocampi of the rats in the AD and ATD groups to produce the AD model. Rats in the ATD group underwent 10 sessions of anodal tDCS, and the after-effects of repetitive anodal tDCS were evaluated by behavioral and histological analyses. A Morris water maze (MWM) was utilized on a monthly basis to assess spatial learning and memory abilities. The ATD group showed shorter escape latencies and more platform region crossings than the AD group. Hippocampal choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) immunohistochemical analyses were carried out after the last MWM assessment. The immunohistochemistry results showed notable differences among the groups, particularly between the AD and ATD groups. This study reveals that repetitive anodal tDCS can not only improve cognitive function and memory performance but also has long-term after-effects that persist for 2 months.

[1]  Xin Zheng,et al.  Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on human regional cerebral blood flow , 2011, NeuroImage.

[2]  R. Morris.  Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat , 1984, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[3]  M. Fahle,et al.  Long-Term Effects of Serial Anodal tDCS on Motion Perception in Subjects with Occipital Stroke Measured in the Unaffected Visual Hemifield , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[4]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Physiology of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2018, The journal of ECT.

[5]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Dopaminergic modulation of long‐lasting direct current‐induced cortical excitability changes in the human motor cortex , 2006 .

[6]  S. Yu,et al.  The Effect of tDCS on Cognition and Neurologic Recovery of Rats with Alzheimer’s Disease , 2014, Journal of physical therapy science.

[7]  A. Priori,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation improves recognition memory in Alzheimer disease , 2008, Neurology.

[8]  S. Nam,et al.  Inflammation and Alzheimer’s disease , 2010, Archives of pharmacal research.

[9]  L. Cohen,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008 , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[10]  F. Bandini,et al.  Long-Term Effects of Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation in Chronic Post-Stroke Aphasia: A Pilot Study , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[11]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Noninvasive brain stimulation in Alzheimer's disease: Systematic review and perspectives for the future , 2011, Experimental Gerontology.

[12]  Zein Al-Atrache,et al.  CHLAMYDIA PNEUMONIAE-INFECTED ASTROCYTES ALTER THEIR EXPRESSION OF ADAM10, BACE1, AND PRESENILIN-1 PROTEASES , 2016, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[13]  J. Knierim.  The hippocampus , 2015, Current Biology.

[14]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Pharmacological Modulation of Cortical Excitability Shifts Induced by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Humans , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  T. Bliss,et al.  A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus , 1993, Nature.

[16]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  Roger J Ordidge,et al.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation increases brain intracellular pH and modulates bioenergetics. , 2013, The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology.

[18]  S. Marchal,et al.  Alzheimer's Disease Related Markers, Cellular Toxicity and Behavioral Deficits Induced Six Weeks after Oligomeric Amyloid-β Peptide Injection in Rats , 2013, PloS one.

[19]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Focusing Effect of Acetylcholine on Neuroplasticity in the Human Motor Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Heidi M. Schambra,et al.  Direct Current Stimulation Promotes BDNF-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity: Potential Implications for Motor Learning , 2010, Neuron.

[21]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  C. Vorhees,et al.  Morris water maze: procedures for assessing spatial and related forms of learning and memory , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[24]  R. D'Hooge,et al.  Applications of the Morris water maze in the study of learning and memory , 2001, Brain Research Reviews.

[25]  P. Matthews,et al.  Polarity-Sensitive Modulation of Cortical Neurotransmitters by Transcranial Stimulation , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Ivan Soltesz,et al.  Dentate gyrus mossy cells control spontaneous convulsive seizures and spatial memory , 2018, Science.

[27]  M. Nitsche,et al.  After-effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on cortical spreading depression , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[28]  C. Plata-salamán,et al.  Inflammation and Alzheimer’s disease , 2000, Neurobiology of Aging.

[29]  J. Cummings,et al.  Alzheimer’s disease drug-development pipeline: few candidates, frequent failures , 2014, Alzheimer's Research & Therapy.

[30]  N. Inestrosa,et al.  Structure-function implications in Alzheimer's disease: effect of Abeta oligomers at central synapses. , 2008, Current Alzheimer research.

[31]  Xuehong Yu,et al.  Intensity-dependent effects of repetitive anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on learning and memory in a rat model of Alzheimer’s disease , 2015, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[32]  Bruce C. Wheeler,et al.  Toward a self-wired active reconstruction of the hippocampal trisynaptic loop: DG-CA3 , 2013, Front. Neural Circuits.

[33]  J. Weuve,et al.  2016 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures , 2016 .

[34]  Sang-Rae Lee,et al.  Neurorestorative Role of Stem Cells in Alzheimer's Disease: Astrocyte Involvement. , 2016, Current Alzheimer research.

[35]  Rudolf Graf,et al.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Modulates Neurogenesis and Microglia Activation in the Mouse Brain , 2016, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[36]  Henrik Zetterberg,et al.  Alzheimer's disease , 2006, The Lancet.

[37]  M. Albert,et al.  Introduction to the recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease , 2011, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[38]  H. Hirase,et al.  Calcium imaging reveals glial involvement in transcranial direct current stimulation-induced plasticity in mouse brain , 2016, Nature Communications.

[39]  M. Bagheri,et al.  Genistein ameliorates learning and memory deficits in amyloid β(1–40) rat model of Alzheimer’s disease , 2011, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[40]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[41]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans , 2001, Neurology.