False-negative mammograms. Medical, legal, and risk management implications.

[1]  Lester Kallsher,et al.  Factors Influencing False Negative Rates in Xeromammography , 1979 .

[2]  M. Moskowitz,et al.  Breast cancer missed by mammography. , 1979, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  N. Gibbs,et al.  Features of mammographically negative breast tumours , 1981 .

[4]  J. Cherry,et al.  Breast cancer study , 1982, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[5]  M Moskowitz,et al.  The predictive value of certain mammographic signs in screening for breast cancer , 1983, Cancer.

[6]  J A Swets,et al.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. , 1988, Science.

[7]  R. J. Brenner,et al.  Medicolegal aspects of screening mammography. , 1989, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  R J Brenner,et al.  Medicolegal aspects of breast imaging: variable standards of care relating to different types of practice. , 1991, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  Medical Legal Aspects of Breast Imaging , 1991 .

[10]  J A Swets,et al.  Enhancing and Evaluating Diagnostic Accuracy , 1991, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[11]  E. Sickles.  Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases. , 1991, Radiology.

[12]  N Segnan,et al.  Inter-observer and intra-observer variability of mammogram interpretation: a field study. , 1992, European journal of cancer.

[13]  J. Swets,et al.  Reading and decision aids for improved accuracy and standardization of mammographic diagnosis. , 1992, Radiology.

[14]  D. Ikeda,et al.  Interval carcinomas in the Malmö Mammographic Screening Trial: radiographic appearance and prognostic considerations. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  R. J. Brenner,et al.  Medicolegal aspects of breast imaging. , 1992, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[16]  R. Bird,et al.  Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. , 1992, Radiology.

[17]  R. Rosenberg,et al.  Improvement in mammography interpretation skills in a community radiology practice after dedicated teaching courses: 2-year medical audit of 38,633 cases. , 1992, Radiology.

[18]  K. Berbaum,et al.  Error in radiology: classification and lessons in 182 cases presented at a problem case conference. , 1992, Radiology.

[19]  L. Fajardo,et al.  Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs blinded interpretation. 1993 ARRS President's Award. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  D. Sarti,et al.  Spontaneous regression of interval benign cysts of the breast. , 1994, Radiology.

[21]  L. J. Burhenne,et al.  Interval breast cancers in the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: analysis and classification. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  J. Elmore,et al.  Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  L W Bassett,et al.  Obtaining previous mammograms for comparison: usefulness and costs. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  G. Stevenson,et al.  Colorectal cancer overlooked at barium enema examination and colonoscopy: a continuing perceptual problem. , 1994, Radiology.

[25]  E. Thurfjell,et al.  Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. , 1994, Radiology.

[26]  S Ciatto,et al.  Independent Double Reading of Screening Mammograms , 1995, Journal of medical screening.

[27]  R. Smith,et al.  The mammography audit: a primer for the mammography quality standards act (MQSA). , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  C. Beam,et al.  Effect of human variability on independent double reading in screening mammography. , 1996, Academic radiology.

[29]  R. Warren,et al.  Mammography screening: an incremental cost effectiveness analysis of double versus single reading of mammograms , 1996, BMJ.

[30]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Likelihood ratios for modern screening mammography. Risk of breast cancer based on age and mammographic interpretation. , 1996, JAMA.

[31]  L J Yeoman,et al.  Screening interval breast cancers: mammographic features and prognosis factors. , 1996, Radiology.

[32]  G. P. Cohen,et al.  Characteristics of breast carcinomas missed by screening radiologists. , 1997, Radiology.

[33]  A. Leitch,et al.  American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of breast cancer: Update 1997 , 1997, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[34]  A R Feinstein,et al.  The impact of clinical history on mammographic interpretations. , 1997, JAMA.

[35]  L. Garfinkel,et al.  Twenty‐year follow‐up of the breast cancers diagnosed during the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project , 1997, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[36]  E. Sickles.  Findings at mammographic screening on only one standard projection: outcomes analysis. , 1998, Radiology.

[37]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. , 1998, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[38]  R. J. Brenner,et al.  Radiology and medical malpractice claims: a report on the practice standards claims survey of the Physician Insurers Association of America and the American College of Radiology. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[39]  J. Elmore,et al.  Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[40]  P. Langenberg,et al.  Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[41]  E A Sickles,et al.  Standardized abnormal interpretation and cancer detection ratios to assess reading volume and reader performance in a breast screening program. , 2000, Radiology.