Supporting children and young people when making decisions about joining clinical trials: qualitative study to inform multimedia website development

Objectives To understand stakeholders’ views regarding the content and design of paediatric clinical trial multimedia websites. To describe how this knowledge informed the development of the multimedia websites. Design Qualitative study comprising two rounds of interviews or focus groups, with thematic analysis of interview transcripts. Participants Sixty-two people (21 children and young people with long-term health conditions, 24 parents and 17 professionals). Setting One UK children’s hospital and one UK Young Persons’ Advisory Group. Results When asked what was important in deciding whether to join a trial, children, young people and parents prioritised information about what participation would involve, what the trial was testing, potential benefits and risks of participation and knowing they could leave the trial if they later changed their minds. Young people and parents trusted trial teams to follow regulatory and quality requirements and therefore did not think such information was a priority for the websites, although logos of trusted organisations could lend credibility. Professionals largely concurred with these views. Children and young people advised on the importance of designing the multimedia website to ensure its appearance, tone and wording suited the intended audience and on using animated characters to facilitate children’s engagement. Conclusions Our study provides insights into the information that families value when deciding about healthcare trial participation. It provides guidance on the design of information resources to appeal to children and young people, while also being acceptable to parents and professionals who are often gatekeepers of children’s access to information. Our findings will be of use to others developing similar multimedia websites. We report specific information needs and new visual preferences that are not usually addressed in printed trial information. Our work illustrates what qualitative research and participatory design practices can contribute to the development of information resources more generally. Trial registration number ISRCTN73136092; Pre-results.

[1]  R. Calvo,et al.  “Kiss myAsthma”: Using a participatory design approach to develop a self-management app with young people with asthma , 2018, The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma.

[2]  Paula R. Williamson,et al.  Trial Forge Guidance 1: what is a Study Within A Trial (SWAT)? , 2018, Trials.

[3]  Stephen Hailes,et al.  Developing and Evaluating JIApp: Acceptability and Usability of a Smartphone App System to Improve Self-Management in Young People With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis , 2017, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[4]  M. Redshaw,et al.  ‘We knew it was a totally at random thing’: parents’ experiences of being part of a neonatal trial , 2017, Trials.

[5]  T. Voepel-Lewis,et al.  Disclosing Study Information to Children and Adolescents: Is What They Want, What Their Parents Think They Want? , 2017, Academic pediatrics.

[6]  P. Bower,et al.  Developing and evaluating multimedia information resources to improve engagement of children, adolescents, and their parents with trials (TRECA study): Study protocol for a series of linked randomised controlled trials , 2017, Trials.

[7]  S. Pryjmachuk,et al.  Prioritizing young people's emotional health support needs via participatory research , 2017, Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing.

[8]  M. Broome,et al.  Understanding Ethical Issues of Research Participation From the Perspective of Participating Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review , 2016, Worldviews on evidence-based nursing.

[9]  L. Locock,et al.  Young People's Experiences of Participation in Clinical Trials: Reasons for Taking Part , 2015, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[10]  B MilesMatthew,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis , 2018, Approaches and Processes of Social Science Research.

[11]  C. Gamble,et al.  Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of insulin delivery by continuous subcutaneous infusion compared to multiple daily injections , 2015, Trials.

[12]  T. Voepel-Lewis,et al.  Using digital multimedia to improve parents’ and children's understanding of clinical trials , 2015, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[13]  J. Fortenberry,et al.  Development and evaluation of a web-based assent for adolescents considering an HIV vaccine trial , 2015, AIDS care.

[14]  Jane Coad,et al.  An exploration of the data collection methods utilised with children, teenagers and young people (CTYPs) , 2015, BMC Research Notes.

[15]  Jonathan C. Craig,et al.  Clinical trials in children. , 2015, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[16]  Terri Voepel-Lewis,et al.  Digital multimedia: a new approach for informed consent? , 2015, JAMA.

[17]  C. Grady,et al.  Assent in research: the voices of adolescents. , 2014, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[18]  H. Williams,et al.  Feasibility, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, multi-centre trial of hand-held NB-UVB phototherapy for the treatment of vitiligo at home (HI-Light trial: Home Intervention of Light therapy) , 2014, Trials.

[19]  V. Braun,et al.  What can “thematic analysis” offer health and wellbeing researchers? , 2014, International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being.

[20]  Jennifer N. Stinson,et al.  The value of usability testing for Internet-based adolescent self-management interventions: “Managing Hemophilia Online” , 2013, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[21]  P. Williamson,et al.  Parents’ Agendas in Paediatric Clinical Trial Recruitment Are Different from Researchers’ and Often Remain Unvoiced: A Qualitative Study , 2013, PloS one.

[22]  F. Gottrand,et al.  Effect of child health status on parents’ allowing children to participate in pediatric research , 2013, BMC medical ethics.

[23]  N. Modi,et al.  A healthy nation: strengthening child health research in the UK , 2013, The Lancet.

[24]  Farrah Jacquez,et al.  A Review of Community-Based Participatory Research in Child Health , 2013, MCN. The American journal of maternal child nursing.

[25]  Jayne Taylor,et al.  Doing Research with Children: A Practical Guide , 2012 .

[26]  B. Young,et al.  Standard 1: Consent and Recruitment , 2012, Pediatrics.

[27]  Heather Draper,et al.  What potential research participants want to know about research: a systematic review , 2012, BMJ Open.

[28]  K. Seers Qualitative data analysis , 2011, Evidence Based Nursing.

[29]  P. Knapp,et al.  Can user testing of a clinical trial patient information sheet make it fit-for-purpose? - a randomized controlled trial , 2011, BMC medicine.

[30]  G. Chatellier,et al.  Readability of the Written Study Information in Pediatric Research in France , 2011, PloS one.

[31]  H. Bertz,et al.  What do our patients understand about their trial participation? Assessing patients' understanding of their informed consent consultation about randomised clinical trials , 2010, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[32]  I. Coyne,et al.  Accessing children as research participants: examining the role of gatekeepers. , 2010, Child: care, health and development.

[33]  Clive Robinson,et al.  research with children: methodological issues and innovative techniques , 2010 .

[34]  L. Hartling,et al.  Children Are Not Just Small Adults: The Urgent Need for High-Quality Trial Evidence in Children , 2008, PLoS medicine.

[35]  R. Smyth,et al.  Making a difference: the clinical research programme for children , 2007, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[36]  J. Paul,et al.  A randomised controlled study of an audiovisual patient information intervention on informed consent and recruitment to cancer clinical trials , 2007, British Journal of Cancer.

[37]  A. Winyard The Nuffield Council on Bioethics Report — Critical care decisions in fetal and neonatal medicine: Ethical issues , 2007 .

[38]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[39]  D. Eadie,et al.  “Hello, hello—it’s English I speak!”: a qualitative exploration of patients’ understanding of the science of clinical trials , 2005, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[40]  T. Voepel-Lewis,et al.  Factors that influence parents' assessments of the risks and benefits of research involving their children. , 2004, Pediatrics.

[41]  K. Schmiegelow,et al.  A qualitative study of decision‐making on Phase III randomized clinical trial participation in paediatric oncology: Adolescents’ and parents’ perspectives and preferences , 2018, Journal of advanced nursing.

[42]  V. Swallow,et al.  Children and young people's views on access to a web‐based application to support personal management of long‐term conditions: a qualitative study , 2017, Child: care, health and development.

[43]  K. Cox,et al.  Innovating information-delivery for potential clinical trials participants. What do patients want from multi-media resources? , 2013, Patient education and counseling.