Challenges Around Integrating Collaborative Immersive Technologies into a Large Infrastructure Engineering Project

Collaborative virtual reality (VR), such as room-based or CAVE-type systems, has demonstrated benefits in engaging teams in the shared design exploration. Though much research explores how virtual reality may be affecting and contributing to the quality of the team discussion for making design decisions, evidence of how this technology becomes used and adopted in practical settings remains limited. Studies from other engineering and manufacture domains consistently report on practical, behavioral and organizational challenges and more often, resistance to introducing innovative technologies and processes. This study examines how technology adopters experience virtual reality, and explores the factors determining the extent of its implementation as an innovative practice. Drawing on the concept of technological frames, we examine how collaborative VR may introduce a non-trivial process change in an organization before it can potentially become an everyday practice. A large portable VR display system was set up in the central office of a large infrastructure project over a period of one year. During the latter half of a second study we did not observe the extensive uptake and use that we and the technology sponsors within the project anticipated. To understand the reasons, we use three technological frames that allows us to examine the technology adoption and organizational change: (i) nature of technology, to understand users’ view of the technology; (ii) technology strategy, to understand users’ role-based views of the motivations and incentives for technology adoption within an organization, and (iii) technology in use, to understand how intended users view the technology use on a daily basis.

[1]  Jennifer Whyte,et al.  Developing a mobile visualization environment for construction applications , 2014 .

[2]  D. Gann,et al.  Last among equals: a comparison of innovation in construction, services and manufacturing in the UK , 2005 .

[3]  Esa Nykänen,et al.  Spaces Meet Users in Virtual Reality , 2008 .

[4]  Andre Brown,et al.  Visualization as a common design language: connecting art and science , 2003 .

[5]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  Validation of the MR Simulation Approach for Evaluating the Effects of Immersion on Visual Analysis of Volume Data , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[6]  Jennifer Whyte,et al.  Virtual Reality and the Built Environment , 2003, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[7]  Rafael Sacks,et al.  Construction safety training using immersive virtual reality , 2013 .

[8]  John A. Gambatese,et al.  Enabling and measuring innovation in the construction industry , 2011 .

[9]  Wei Feng,et al.  “Virtual Design Studio”—Part 1: Interdisciplinary design processes , 2013 .

[10]  Clyde B. Tatum,et al.  Process of Innovation in Construction Firm , 1987 .

[11]  Kjeld Svidt,et al.  User participation in the building process , 2011, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[12]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[13]  David R. Riley,et al.  Process Indicators to Track Effectiveness of High-Performance Green Building Projects , 2013 .

[14]  Chris Harty,et al.  JOURNEYS THROUGH THE CAVE: THE USE OF 3D IMMERSIVE ENVIRONMENTS FOR CLIENT ENGAGEMENT PRACTICES IN HOSPITAL DESIGN , 2013 .

[15]  Henrik Linderoth,et al.  The influence of contextual elements, actors’ frames of reference, and technology on the adoption and use of ICT in construction projects: a Swedish case study , 2010 .

[16]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations , 1994, TOIS.

[17]  Chris Harty,et al.  Diffusion of digital innovation in construction: a case study of a UK engineering firm , 2015 .

[18]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[19]  John I. Messner,et al.  Evaluating the Use of Immersive Display Media for Construction Planning , 2006, EG-ICE.

[20]  K. Klein,et al.  The Challenge of Innovation Implementation , 1996 .

[21]  Torsten Kuhlen,et al.  Quo Vadis CAVE: Does Immersive Visualization Still Matter? , 2014, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[22]  Yifan Liu,et al.  An evaluation of immersive virtual reality systems for design reviews , 2013 .

[23]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  Meaning to change: how diverse stakeholders interpret organizational communication about change initiatives , 2001 .

[24]  J. Cornelissen,et al.  Putting Framing in Perspective: A Review of Framing and Frame Analysis across the Management and Organizational Literature , 2014 .

[25]  Timothy Shaw,et al.  Using immersive virtual environments to develop and visualize construction schedules for advanced nuclear power plants , 2003 .

[26]  Phillip S. Dunston,et al.  Virtual reality mock-ups for healthcare facility design and a model for technology hub collaboration , 2010 .

[27]  Dragana Nikolic,et al.  EVALUATING RELATIVE IMPACT OF VIRTUAL REALITY COMPONENTS DETAIL AND REALISM ON SPATIAL COMPREHENSION AND PRESENCE , 2007 .

[28]  Libby Schweber,et al.  Putting theory to work: the use of theory in construction research , 2015 .

[29]  Jennifer Whyte,et al.  Innovation and users: virtual reality in the construction sector , 2003 .