Inverse attribute functions and the proposed modifications of the power law

Three prominent modifications of Stevens’ power law, designed to account for the curvature at low stimulus intensities, were examined in the light of previously reported inverse attribute functions and five new experiments scaling loudness and softness by magnitude estimation. One hundred and seven students served as observers in the five experiments. Lack of curvature in the inverse functions at low stimulus intensities, plus the lack of parameter invariance, pointed to the inadequacy of the effective threshold and physiological noise modifications. The additive constant model of zero-point response bias, previously advanced by Irwin and Corballis (1968)and McGill (1960)was found more satisfactory. A discussion of the implications of the research findings for subsequent formulations of the modified power law was included.

[1]  R. F. Fagot,et al.  An experimental comparison of stimulus and response translated power functions for brightness , 1968 .

[2]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  The scaling of subjective roughness and smoothness. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  Miguelina Guirao,et al.  Loudness, reciprocality, and partition scales. , 1962 .

[4]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Subjective scaling of length and area and the matching of length to loudness and brightness. , 1963, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  M. D. de Mattiello,et al.  Direct estimation of lightness of surface colors. , 1974, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[6]  THE CEILING OF PSYCHOPHYSICAL POWER FUNCTIONS. , 1965, The American journal of psychology.

[7]  H. Lane,et al.  Ratio Scales, Category Scales, and Variability in the Production of Loudness and Softness , 1963 .

[8]  L. Marks,et al.  The form of the psychophysical function near threshold , 1968 .

[9]  R. J. Irwin,et al.  On the general form of Stevens’ law for loudness and softness , 1968 .

[10]  S S Stevens,et al.  Sensation Measurement by Inverse Judgments. , 1962, Science.

[11]  G. Ekman.  METHODOLOGICAL NOTE ON SCALES OF GUSTATORY INTENSITY , 1961 .

[12]  S. S. Stevens.  Issues in psychophysical measurement. , 1971 .

[13]  S. S. Stevens.  Perceived Level of Noise by Mark VII and Decibels (E) , 1972 .

[14]  I. John.  The properties of distributions of magnitude estimates of loudness and softness. , 1971, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology.

[15]  S. S. Stevens.  On predicting exponents for cross-modality matches , 1969 .

[16]  D H Krantz,et al.  Threshold theories of signal detection. , 1969, Psychological review.

[17]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Psychophysics: Introduction to Its Perceptual, Neural and Social Prospects , 1975 .

[18]  Lawrence E. Marks,et al.  Sensory Processes: The new Psychophysics , 1975 .

[19]  G. Ekman.  Weber's Law and Related Functions , 1959 .

[20]  J. Lochner,et al.  Form of the Loudness Function in the Presence of Masking Noise , 1961 .

[21]  R. F. Fagot.  A note on the form of the psychophysical function near threshold , 1975 .

[22]  S. S. Stevens.  The Measurement of Loudness , 1955 .

[23]  W. E. Dawson,et al.  Inverse Scales of Opinion Obtained by Sensory-Modality Matching , 1976 .

[24]  S. S. Stevens.  The direct estimation of sensory magnitudes-loudness. , 1956, The American journal of psychology.

[25]  George A. Gescheider,et al.  Psychophysics: Method and theory , 1976 .

[26]  D. W. Curtis,et al.  Magnitude judgments and difference judgments of lightness and darkness: a two-stage analysis. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[27]  D. W. Curtis,et al.  Reevaluation of two models for judgments of perceptual intervals , 1973 .

[28]  H. Eisler.  EMPIRICAL TEST OF A MODEL RELATING MAGNITUDE AND CATEGORY SCALES , 1962 .

[29]  W. J. McGill.  The Slope of the Loudness Function: A Puzzle , 1974 .

[30]  Alternative power laws for ratio scaling , 1966, Psychometrika.