Functional assessment of jailed side branches in coronary bifurcation lesions using fractional flow reserve.

[1]  P. Serruys,et al.  Bifurcation lesions: Functional assessment by fractional flow reserve vs. anatomical assessment using conventional and dedicated bifurcation quantitative coronary angiogram , 2010, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[2]  Young-Seok Cho,et al.  Anatomic and Functional Evaluation of Bifurcation Lesions Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[3]  A. Colombo,et al.  Bifurcation lesions: an inside view. , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[4]  A. Baumbach,et al.  Randomized Trial of Simple Versus Complex Drug-Eluting Stenting for Bifurcation Lesions: The British Bifurcation Coronary Study: Old, New, and Evolving Strategies , 2010, Circulation.

[5]  N. Shah,et al.  Reduction in myocardial perfusion territory and its effect on the physiological severity of a coronary stenosis. , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[6]  U. Siebert,et al.  Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  M. Vanderheyden,et al.  Long-Term Clinical Outcome After Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided Treatment in Patients With Angiographically Equivocal Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis , 2009, Circulation.

[8]  E. Bramucci,et al.  Randomized Study of the Crush Technique Versus Provisional Side-Branch Stenting in True Coronary Bifurcations: The CACTUS (Coronary Bifurcations: Application of the Crushing Technique Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stents) Study , 2009, Circulation.

[9]  S. de Servi,et al.  Impact of Bifurcation Technique on 2-Year Clinical Outcomes in 773 Patients With Distal Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis Treated With Drug-Eluting Stents , 2008, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[10]  F. Neumann,et al.  Randomized trial on routine vs. provisional T-stenting in the treatment of de novo coronary bifurcation lesions , 2008, European heart journal.

[11]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  A novel dedicated quantitative coronary analysis methodology for bifurcation lesions. , 2008, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[12]  Young-Seok Cho,et al.  Physiological evaluation of the provisional side-branch intervention strategy for bifurcation lesions using fractional flow reserve. , 2008, European heart journal.

[13]  Vladimir Dzavik,et al.  Classification of coronary artery bifurcation lesions and treatments: Time for a consensus! , 2008, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[14]  Gerhard Koning,et al.  A new quantitative analysis system for the evaluation of coronary bifurcation lesions: Comparison with current conventional methods , 2007, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[15]  M. Niemelä,et al.  Randomized Study on Simple Versus Complex Stenting of Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions: The Nordic Bifurcation Study , 2006, Circulation.

[16]  Maria Siebes,et al.  Physiological assessment of coronary artery disease in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology. , 2006, Circulation.

[17]  J. Suárez de Lezo,et al.  [A new classification of coronary bifurcation lesions]. , 2006, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[18]  Alfonso Medina,et al.  Una clasificación simple de las lesiones coronarias en bifurcación , 2006 .

[19]  D. Wald,et al.  Haemodynamic significance of ostial side branch nipping following percutaneous intervention at bifurcations: a pressure wire pilot study , 2005, Heart.

[20]  Young‐Bae Park,et al.  Physiologic assessment of jailed side branch lesions using fractional flow reserve. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  K. Gould,et al.  Abnormal Epicardial Coronary Resistance in Patients With Diffuse Atherosclerosis but “Normal” Coronary Angiography , 2001, Circulation.

[22]  M. Greiner,et al.  Principles and practical application of the receiver-operating characteristic analysis for diagnostic tests. , 2000, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[23]  P. H. van der Voort,et al.  Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  B. Gersh,et al.  Angiographic Versus Functional Severity of Coronary Artery Stenoses in the FAME Study: Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography in Multivessel Evaluation , 2011 .