On the heating mix of ITER

This paper considers the heating mix of ITER for the two main scenarios. Presently, 73 MW of absorbed power are foreseen in the mix 20/33/20 for ECH, NBI and ICH. Given a sufficient edge stability, Q = 10-the goal of scenario 2-can be reached with 40MW power irrespective of the heating method but depends sensitively inter alia on the H-mode pedestal temperature, the density profile shape and on the characteristics of impurity transport. ICH preferentially heats the ions and would contribute specifically with Delta Q 0.5, and strong off-axis current drive (CD). The findings presented here are based on revised CD efficiencies gamma for ECCD and a detailed benchmark of several CD codes. With ECCD alone, the goals of scenario 4 can hardly be reached. Efficient off-axis CD is only possible with NBI. With beams, inductive discharges with f(ni) > 0.8 can be maintained for 3000 s. The conclusion of this study is that the present heating mix of ITER is appropriate. It provides the necessary actuators to induce in a flexible way the best possible scenarios. The development risks of NBI at 1 MeV can be reduced by operation at 0.85 MeV.

[1]  Julien Fuchs,et al.  H-mode confinement properties close to the power threshold in ASDEX Upgrade , 2008 .

[2]  M. Takechi,et al.  Reactor relevant current drive and heating by N-NBI on JT-60U , 2001 .

[3]  David Ward,et al.  The physics of DEMO , 2010 .

[4]  J. Kinsey,et al.  RECENT EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF EDGE AND INTERNAL TRANSPORT BARRIERS IN THE DIII-D TOKAMAK , 2002 .

[5]  E. Joffrin,et al.  Chapter 6: Steady state operation , 2007 .

[6]  M. Tuszewski,et al.  Fast ion ripple losses during neutral injection in TFR , 1988 .

[7]  Nikolai B. Marushchenko,et al.  Corrections to the paper ‘electron cyclotron current drive calculated for ITER conditions using different models’ (2008 Nucl. Fusion 48 054002) , 2009 .

[8]  Daniela Farina,et al.  A Quasi-Optical Beam-Tracing Code for Electron Cyclotron Absorption and Current Drive: GRAY , 2007 .

[9]  D. B. Batchelor Radio frequency power in plasmas : Charleston, SC 1991 , 1991 .

[10]  C. Holcomb,et al.  Evidence for fast-ion transport by microturbulence. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[11]  R. Budny Current Control in ITER Steady State Plasmas With Neutral Beam Steering , 2010 .

[12]  Hiroshi Shirai,et al.  Relationship between particle and heat transport in JT-60U plasmas with internal transport barrier , 2003 .

[13]  Nikolai B. Marushchenko,et al.  Electron cyclotron current drive calculated for ITER conditions using different models , 2008 .

[14]  A. Loarte,et al.  Study of Type III ELMs in JET , 2004 .

[15]  J. A. Leuer,et al.  Development of ITER 15 MA ELMy H-mode inductive scenario , 2008 .

[16]  K. Ikeda Progress in the ITER Physics Basis , 2007 .

[17]  I. Furno,et al.  Particle transport with high power central ECH and ECCD in TCV , 2001 .

[18]  R. Wilhelm The strengths, needs and possible drawbacks of different heating and current drive systems in relation to ITER , 1998 .

[19]  E. Fable,et al.  Particle transport in tokamak plasmas, theory and experiment , 2009 .

[20]  W. Treutterer,et al.  Confinement and transport studies of conventional scenarios in ASDEX Upgrade , 2001 .

[21]  A. Polevoi,et al.  Chapter 1: Overview and summary , 2007 .

[22]  D. McCune,et al.  New techniques for calculating heat and particle source rates due to neutral beam injection in axisymmetric tokamaks , 1981 .

[23]  J. B. Lister,et al.  A lower hybrid current drive system for ITER , 2009 .

[24]  L. Lao,et al.  Edge localized modes and the pedestal: A model based on coupled peeling–ballooning modes , 2002 .

[25]  R. Waltz,et al.  A gyro-Landau-fluid transport model , 1997 .

[26]  F. Ryter,et al.  Density peaking, anomalous pinch, and collisionality in tokamak plasmas. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[27]  O. Sauter,et al.  EU developments of the ITER ECRH system , 2007 .

[28]  V. Erckmann,et al.  Power Combination of Two 140-GHz Gyrotrons and Fast Switching of the Combined Beam , 2009 .

[29]  T. Fujita,et al.  Chapter 2: Plasma confinement and transport , 2007 .

[30]  T. Inoue,et al.  Acceleration of ampere class H(-) ion beam by MeV accelerator. , 2008, The Review of scientific instruments.

[31]  G. V. Pereverzev,et al.  Paraxial Gaussian wave beam propagation in an anisotropic inhomogeneous plasma , 1999 .

[32]  J. Garcia,et al.  Critical behavior of magnetically confined plasma regimes. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[33]  R. V. Budny,et al.  Comparisons of predicted plasma performance in ITER H-mode plasmas with various mixes of external heating , 2009 .

[34]  Jet Efda Contributors,et al.  Overview on Experiments On ITER‐like Antenna On JET And ICRF Antenna Design For ITER , 2009 .

[35]  G. Gantenbein,et al.  Electron Cyclotron Heating for W7-X: Physics and Technology , 2007 .

[36]  F. Imbeaux,et al.  Critical threshold behavior for steady-state internal transport barriers in burning plasmas. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[37]  R. W. Harvey,et al.  Benchmarking of codes for electron cyclotron heating and electron cyclotron current drive under ITER conditions , 2008 .