How Much Are Patients Willing to Pay to Avoid Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting?

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are unpleasant experiences. However, there is no drug that is completely effective in preventing PONV. Whereas cost effectiveness analyses rely on specific health outcomes (e.g., years of life saved), cost-benefit analyses assess the cost and benefit of medical therapy in terms of dollars. We hypothesized that patients were willing to pay for a hypothetical new drug that would eliminate PONV. Eighty elective day surgical patients using general anesthesia participated in the study. After their recovery in the postanesthetic care unit, they were asked to complete an interactive computer questionnaire on demographics, the value of avoiding PONV, and their willingness to pay for an antiemetic. Patients were willing to pay US$56 (US$26--US$97; median, 25%--75%) for an antiemetic that would completely prevent PONV. Patients who developed nausea (n = 21; 26%) and vomiting (n = 9; 11%) were willing to pay US$73 (US$44--US$110) and $100 (US$61--US$200; median, 25%--75%), respectively (P < 0.05). Seventy-six percent of patients considered avoiding postoperative nausea and 78% of patients considered avoiding vomiting as important (> or = 50 mm on a 0--100-mm visual analog scale). Nausea or vomiting in the postanesthetic care unit, greater patient income, previous history of PONV, more importance placed on avoiding nausea and vomiting, increasing age, and being married are independent covariates that increase the willingness to pay estimates. Patients associated a value with the avoidance of PONV and were willing to pay between US$56 and US$100 for a completely effective antiemetic.

[1]  M K Goldstein,et al.  Developing and Testing a Multimedia Presentation of a Health-state Description , 1994, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[2]  B. Philip,et al.  Patients' assessment of ambulatory anesthesia and surgery. , 1992, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[3]  P. White,et al.  The Effect of Timing of Ondansetron Administration on Its Efficacy, Cost-Effectiveness, and Cost-Benefit as a Prophylactic Antiemetic in the Ambulatory Setting , 1998, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[4]  D J Balaban,et al.  Weights for Scoring the Quality of Well-being Instrument Among Rheumatoid Arthritics: A Comparison to General Population Weights , 1986, Medical care.

[5]  P. Glass,et al.  Double-blind, Randomized Comparison of Ondansetron and Intraoperative Propofol to Prevent Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting , 1996, Anesthesiology.

[6]  L. Diez Assessing the Willingness of Parents to Pay for Reducing Postoperative Emesis in Children , 1998, PharmacoEconomics (Auckland).

[7]  W. Viscusi,et al.  Alternative approaches to valuing intangible health losses: the evidence for multiple sclerosis. , 1998, Journal of health economics.

[8]  A. Macario,et al.  Which clinical anesthesia outcomes are important to avoid? The perspective of patients. , 1999, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[9]  A. Detsky,et al.  A clinician's guide to cost-effectiveness analysis. , 1990, Annals of internal medicine.

[10]  N. Powe,et al.  Risk Reduction From Low Osmolality Contrast Media: What Do Patients Think It is Worth? , 1990, Medical care.

[11]  P. Shackley,et al.  Stepwise or couple antenatal carrier screening for cystic fibrosis?: women's preferences and willingness to pay. , 1995, Journal of medical genetics.

[12]  T. Gan,et al.  Double-blind comparison of ondansetron, droperidol and saline in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. , 1994, British journal of anaesthesia.